Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

Ensuring Grand Jury Integrity: DOSS v. STATE Establishes Mandatory Selection Procedures

Ensuring Grand Jury Integrity: DOSS v. STATE Establishes Mandatory Selection Procedures

Date: Jun 28, 1929
Ensuring Grand Jury Integrity: DOSS v. STATE Establishes Mandatory Selection Procedures Introduction DOSS v. STATE, 220 Ala. 30 (Supreme Court of Alabama, June 27, 1929), stands as a pivotal case in...
Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice: Carraway v. Graham Establishes Physician Liability Boundaries

Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice: Carraway v. Graham Establishes Physician Liability Boundaries

Date: Dec 7, 1928
Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice: Carraway v. Graham Establishes Physician Liability Boundaries Introduction Carraway v. Graham, 218 Ala. 453 (1928), is a seminal case in the realm of medical...
Public Corporations as Instruments of State Authority: Insights from Alabama State Bridge Co. v. Smith (1928)

Public Corporations as Instruments of State Authority: Insights from Alabama State Bridge Co. v. Smith (1928)

Date: Mar 23, 1928
Public Corporations as Instruments of State Authority: Insights from Alabama State Bridge Co. v. Smith (1928) Introduction The case of Alabama State Bridge Corporation et al. v. Smith (217 Ala. 311),...
Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal Lumber Co.: Affirmation of Materialman's Lien Priority

Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal Lumber Co.: Affirmation of Materialman's Lien Priority

Date: Jan 13, 1928
Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal Lumber Co.: Affirmation of Materialman's Lien Priority Introduction Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal Lumber Co. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
BATSON v. STATE ex rel. DAVIS: Waiver of Juror Qualification Challenges and Strict Procedural Compliance in Impeachment Proceedings

BATSON v. STATE ex rel. DAVIS: Waiver of Juror Qualification Challenges and Strict Procedural Compliance in Impeachment Proceedings

Date: May 27, 1927
BATSON v. STATE ex rel. DAVIS: Waiver of Juror Qualification Challenges and Strict Procedural Compliance in Impeachment Proceedings Introduction BATSON v. STATE ex rel. DAVIS is a landmark decision...
Defining Wantonness and Contributory Negligence in Personal Injury Law: Commentary on GODFREY v. VINSON

Defining Wantonness and Contributory Negligence in Personal Injury Law: Commentary on GODFREY v. VINSON

Date: Nov 5, 1926
Defining Wantonness and Contributory Negligence in Personal Injury Law: Commentary on GODFREY v. VINSON Introduction The landmark case of GODFREY v. VINSON, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Lowery v. May: Covenantal Interpretation of Timber Contracts Over Forfeiture Conditions

Lowery v. May: Covenantal Interpretation of Timber Contracts Over Forfeiture Conditions

Date: Apr 24, 1925
Lowery v. May: Covenantal Interpretation of Timber Contracts Over Forfeiture Conditions Introduction Lowery v. May (213 Ala. 66, 1925) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Alabama that...
Establishing Corporate Liability in Assault and Battery: Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Carter

Establishing Corporate Liability in Assault and Battery: Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Carter

Date: Nov 28, 1924
Establishing Corporate Liability in Assault and Battery: Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Carter Introduction The case of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Carter (212 Ala. 212), adjudicated by the...
Establishing Duty of Care Under the Employers' Liability Act: Insights from Southern Ry. Co. v. Dickson

Establishing Duty of Care Under the Employers' Liability Act: Insights from Southern Ry. Co. v. Dickson

Date: Jun 20, 1924
Establishing Duty of Care Under the Employers' Liability Act: Insights from Southern Ry. Co. v. Dickson Introduction Southern Ry. Co. v. Dickson, 211 Ala. 481 (1924), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Partial Undue Influence Does Not Void Entire Will: Lewis v. Martin (210 Ala. 401)

Partial Undue Influence Does Not Void Entire Will: Lewis v. Martin (210 Ala. 401)

Date: Dec 7, 1923
Partial Undue Influence Does Not Void Entire Will: Lewis v. Martin (210 Ala. 401) Introduction Lewis et al. v. Martin is a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court of Alabama on December 6,...
Admissibility of Evidence and Insanity Defense: Insights from ANDERSON v. STATE (1923)

Admissibility of Evidence and Insanity Defense: Insights from ANDERSON v. STATE (1923)

Date: Jan 26, 1923
Admissibility of Evidence and Insanity Defense: Insights from ANDERSON v. STATE (1923) Introduction ANDERSON v. STATE, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alabama on January 25, 1923, addresses...
Knowles v. Blue et al.: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Granting Continuances in Alabama Courts

Knowles v. Blue et al.: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Granting Continuances in Alabama Courts

Date: Jan 19, 1923
Knowles v. Blue et al.: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Granting Continuances in Alabama Courts Introduction Knowles v. Blue et al., 209 Ala. 27, decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Certiorari Scope in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Certiorari Scope in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Date: Feb 10, 1922
Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Certiorari Scope in Workmen's Compensation Cases Introduction The case of Ex parte SLOSS-SHEFFIELD STEEL IRON CO. GREEK v. SLOSS-SHEFFIELD STEEL IRON CO. (207 Ala....
Establishing Equitable Interests through Written Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on HODGE et al. v. JOY et al. (207 Ala. 198)

Establishing Equitable Interests through Written Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on HODGE et al. v. JOY et al. (207 Ala. 198)

Date: Feb 3, 1922
Establishing Equitable Interests through Written Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on HODGE et al. v. JOY et al. (207 Ala. 198) Introduction In the landmark case of HODGE et al. v. JOY et al....
BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO.: Affirmation of Jury's Role in Assessing Credibility and Verdict Directions

BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO.: Affirmation of Jury's Role in Assessing Credibility and Verdict Directions

Date: Dec 23, 1921
BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO.: Affirmation of Jury's Role in Assessing Credibility and Verdict Directions Introduction BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO., 207 Ala. 61 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921), is a...
Juror Impartiality and Judicial Influence: Analysis of LEITH v. STATE (1921)

Juror Impartiality and Judicial Influence: Analysis of LEITH v. STATE (1921)

Date: Oct 14, 1921
Juror Impartiality and Judicial Influence: Analysis of LEITH v. STATE (1921) Introduction LEITH v. STATE, 206 Ala. 439 (1921), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alabama that...
Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford: Establishing Certiorari as the Exclusive Review Mechanism under the Workmen's Compensation Act

Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford: Establishing Certiorari as the Exclusive Review Mechanism under the Workmen's Compensation Act

Date: Oct 14, 1921
Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford: Establishing Certiorari as the Exclusive Review Mechanism under the Workmen's Compensation Act Introduction Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford (206 Ala. 447) is a landmark...
Dennison v. State: Reinforcing the Admissibility of Evidence in Larceny Cases

Dennison v. State: Reinforcing the Admissibility of Evidence in Larceny Cases

Date: Feb 2, 1921
Dennison v. State: Reinforcing the Admissibility of Evidence in Larceny Cases Introduction Dennison v. State is a pivotal 1921 decision by the Court of Appeals of Alabama that addresses critical...
Adverse Possession and Color of Title in Mixed Possession Cases: Insights from McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al.

Adverse Possession and Color of Title in Mixed Possession Cases: Insights from McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al.

Date: Nov 19, 1920
Adverse Possession and Color of Title in Mixed Possession Cases: Insights from McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al. (205 Ala. 35) Introduction The landmark case of McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al., decided by the...
Sufficiency of Pleadings in Establishing Wanton or Willful Conduct: Jackson v. Vaughn (1920)

Sufficiency of Pleadings in Establishing Wanton or Willful Conduct: Jackson v. Vaughn (1920)

Date: Oct 22, 1920
Sufficiency of Pleadings in Establishing Wanton or Willful Conduct Introduction Jackson v. Vaughn is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on October 21, 1920. This case revolves...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert