Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

Partial Undue Influence Does Not Void Entire Will: Lewis v. Martin (210 Ala. 401)

Partial Undue Influence Does Not Void Entire Will: Lewis v. Martin (210 Ala. 401)

Date: Dec 7, 1923
Partial Undue Influence Does Not Void Entire Will: Lewis v. Martin (210 Ala. 401) Introduction Lewis et al. v. Martin is a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court of Alabama on December 6,...
Admissibility of Evidence and Insanity Defense: Insights from ANDERSON v. STATE (1923)

Admissibility of Evidence and Insanity Defense: Insights from ANDERSON v. STATE (1923)

Date: Jan 26, 1923
Admissibility of Evidence and Insanity Defense: Insights from ANDERSON v. STATE (1923) Introduction ANDERSON v. STATE, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alabama on January 25, 1923, addresses...
Knowles v. Blue et al.: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Granting Continuances in Alabama Courts

Knowles v. Blue et al.: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Granting Continuances in Alabama Courts

Date: Jan 19, 1923
Knowles v. Blue et al.: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Granting Continuances in Alabama Courts Introduction Knowles v. Blue et al., 209 Ala. 27, decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Certiorari Scope in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Certiorari Scope in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Date: Feb 10, 1922
Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Certiorari Scope in Workmen's Compensation Cases Introduction The case of Ex parte SLOSS-SHEFFIELD STEEL IRON CO. GREEK v. SLOSS-SHEFFIELD STEEL IRON CO. (207 Ala....
Establishing Equitable Interests through Written Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on HODGE et al. v. JOY et al. (207 Ala. 198)

Establishing Equitable Interests through Written Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on HODGE et al. v. JOY et al. (207 Ala. 198)

Date: Feb 3, 1922
Establishing Equitable Interests through Written Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on HODGE et al. v. JOY et al. (207 Ala. 198) Introduction In the landmark case of HODGE et al. v. JOY et al....
BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO.: Affirmation of Jury's Role in Assessing Credibility and Verdict Directions

BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO.: Affirmation of Jury's Role in Assessing Credibility and Verdict Directions

Date: Dec 23, 1921
BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO.: Affirmation of Jury's Role in Assessing Credibility and Verdict Directions Introduction BROWN v. MOBILE ELECTRIC CO., 207 Ala. 61 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921), is a...
Juror Impartiality and Judicial Influence: Analysis of LEITH v. STATE (1921)

Juror Impartiality and Judicial Influence: Analysis of LEITH v. STATE (1921)

Date: Oct 14, 1921
Juror Impartiality and Judicial Influence: Analysis of LEITH v. STATE (1921) Introduction LEITH v. STATE, 206 Ala. 439 (1921), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alabama that...
Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford: Establishing Certiorari as the Exclusive Review Mechanism under the Workmen's Compensation Act

Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford: Establishing Certiorari as the Exclusive Review Mechanism under the Workmen's Compensation Act

Date: Oct 14, 1921
Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford: Establishing Certiorari as the Exclusive Review Mechanism under the Workmen's Compensation Act Introduction Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford (206 Ala. 447) is a landmark...
Dennison v. State: Reinforcing the Admissibility of Evidence in Larceny Cases

Dennison v. State: Reinforcing the Admissibility of Evidence in Larceny Cases

Date: Feb 2, 1921
Dennison v. State: Reinforcing the Admissibility of Evidence in Larceny Cases Introduction Dennison v. State is a pivotal 1921 decision by the Court of Appeals of Alabama that addresses critical...
Adverse Possession and Color of Title in Mixed Possession Cases: Insights from McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al.

Adverse Possession and Color of Title in Mixed Possession Cases: Insights from McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al.

Date: Nov 19, 1920
Adverse Possession and Color of Title in Mixed Possession Cases: Insights from McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al. (205 Ala. 35) Introduction The landmark case of McMILLAN v. AIKEN et al., decided by the...
Sufficiency of Pleadings in Establishing Wanton or Willful Conduct: Jackson v. Vaughn (1920)

Sufficiency of Pleadings in Establishing Wanton or Willful Conduct: Jackson v. Vaughn (1920)

Date: Oct 22, 1920
Sufficiency of Pleadings in Establishing Wanton or Willful Conduct Introduction Jackson v. Vaughn is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on October 21, 1920. This case revolves...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and the Burden of Proof in Negligence Cases: Analysis of Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.

Res Ipsa Loquitur and the Burden of Proof in Negligence Cases: Analysis of Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.

Date: Jun 4, 1920
Res Ipsa Loquitur and the Burden of Proof in Negligence Cases: Analysis of Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co. Introduction Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Arbitrary Population Classification in Legislation: Reynolds v. Collier

Arbitrary Population Classification in Legislation: Reynolds v. Collier

Date: Jan 23, 1920
Arbitrary Population Classification in Legislation: Reynolds v. Collier Introduction Reynolds, County Treasurer, et al. v. Collier is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
Clarifying Contributory Negligence and Signal Reliability in Railroad Crossing Injuries

Clarifying Contributory Negligence and Signal Reliability in Railroad Crossing Injuries

Date: Apr 11, 1919
Clarifying Contributory Negligence and Signal Reliability in Railroad Crossing Injuries 1. Introduction The case of Birmingham Southern Railway Company v. Harrison, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Strict Standards for Equitable Injunctions: Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.

Strict Standards for Equitable Injunctions: Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.

Date: Dec 21, 1917
Strict Standards for Equitable Injunctions: Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. Introduction Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co., 201 Ala. 150 (1917), is a seminal case...
Establishing Standards for Contributory Negligence and Employer Liability in Employment Injury Cases: Clinton Mining Co. v. Bradford

Establishing Standards for Contributory Negligence and Employer Liability in Employment Injury Cases: Clinton Mining Co. v. Bradford

Date: Jun 15, 1917
Establishing Standards for Contributory Negligence and Employer Liability in Employment Injury Cases: Clinton Mining Co. v. Bradford Introduction Clinton Mining Co. v. Bradford, 200 Ala. 308 (1917),...
Robinson v. Crotwell: Clarifying Surgeon Liability and Patient Consent in Medical Malpractice

Robinson v. Crotwell: Clarifying Surgeon Liability and Patient Consent in Medical Malpractice

Date: Dec 22, 1911
Robinson v. Crotwell: Clarifying Surgeon Liability and Patient Consent in Medical Malpractice Introduction Robinson v. Crotwell is a landmark 1911 decision by the Supreme Court of Alabama that...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert