Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Compassionate Release Standards: An Analysis of United States v. Roman Murray

Reaffirming Compassionate Release Standards: An Analysis of United States v. Roman Murray

Date: Mar 19, 2024
Reaffirming Compassionate Release Standards: An Analysis of United States v. Roman Murray Introduction In United States of America v. Roman Murray, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Clarifying Statute of Limitations and Bad Faith Standards in Insurance Claims: Nelson v. State Farm

Clarifying Statute of Limitations and Bad Faith Standards in Insurance Claims: Nelson v. State Farm

Date: Mar 16, 2024
Clarifying Statute of Limitations and Bad Faith Standards in Insurance Claims: Nelson v. State Farm Introduction In the case of Rebecca Nelson, Appellant v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., decided...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gardner v. Ulta: Policy Violation Not Discrimination

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gardner v. Ulta: Policy Violation Not Discrimination

Date: Mar 15, 2024
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gardiner v. Ulta: Policy Violation Not Discrimination Introduction The case of Tracie Gardner, Appellant v. Ulta Salon Cosmetics and Fragrance Inc. was adjudicated...
Third Circuit Upholds Terrorism Sentencing Enhancement for Retaliatory Intent in Church Bombing Plot

Third Circuit Upholds Terrorism Sentencing Enhancement for Retaliatory Intent in Church Bombing Plot

Date: Mar 13, 2024
Third Circuit Upholds Terrorism Sentencing Enhancement for Retaliatory Intent in Church Bombing Plot Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Mustafa Mousab Alowemer, the United States...
Reaffirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Arrest Warrant Applications: Pinkney v. Meadville

Reaffirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Arrest Warrant Applications: Pinkney v. Meadville

Date: Mar 13, 2024
Reaffirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Arrest Warrant Applications: Pinkney v. Meadville Introduction The case of Kobe Pinkney v. Meadville, Pennsylvania addresses significant issues...
Statute of Limitations and Notice Requirements in Summary Judgment: Analysis of Armstrong v. Gretsky

Statute of Limitations and Notice Requirements in Summary Judgment: Analysis of Armstrong v. Gretsky

Date: Mar 12, 2024
Statute of Limitations and Notice Requirements in Summary Judgment: Analysis of Armstrong v. Gretsky Introduction In the case of Lavar Armstrong v. Captain John Gretsky et al., the United States...
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Evidentiary Standards in §1983 Prison Claims

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Evidentiary Standards in §1983 Prison Claims

Date: Mar 9, 2024
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Evidentiary Standards in §1983 Prison Claims Introduction In the case of Shariff Butler; Jeremey Melvin, Appellants v. John E. Wetzel, et al., the United...
Non-Attorney Parental Representation in IDEA Claims Affirmed as Improper: Ho v. Lower Merion School District

Non-Attorney Parental Representation in IDEA Claims Affirmed as Improper: Ho v. Lower Merion School District

Date: Mar 9, 2024
Non-Attorney Parental Representation in IDEA Claims Affirmed as Improper: Ho v. Lower Merion School District Introduction The case of Paul Ho, Appellant v. Lower Merion School District adjudicated by...
Prosecution's Breach of Plea Agreement: United States v. Danny Cruz Establishes Precedent on Remedies

Prosecution's Breach of Plea Agreement: United States v. Danny Cruz Establishes Precedent on Remedies

Date: Mar 9, 2024
Prosecution's Breach of Plea Agreement: United States v. Danny Cruz Establishes Precedent on Remedies Introduction In United States of America v. Danny Cruz, 95 F.4th 106 (2024), the United States...
Clarifying Plea Agreement Breaches and Habeas Relief: Insights from Lacombe v. Warden James T. Vaughn Correctional Center

Clarifying Plea Agreement Breaches and Habeas Relief: Insights from Lacombe v. Warden James T. Vaughn Correctional Center

Date: Mar 9, 2024
Clarifying Plea Agreement Breaches and Habeas Relief: Insights from Lacombe v. Warden James T. Vaughn Correctional Center Introduction Claude P. Lacombe v. Warden James T. Vaughn Correctional Center;...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prisoners' Civil Rights Actions: Analysis of R. Miller v. PADOC

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prisoners' Civil Rights Actions: Analysis of R. Miller v. PADOC

Date: Mar 7, 2024
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prisoners' Civil Rights Actions: Analysis of R. Miller v. PADOC Introduction The case of Ricky Miller v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (PADOC)...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Eighth Amendment Excessive Force Claim: Landis v. Moyer

Affirmation of Dismissal in Eighth Amendment Excessive Force Claim: Landis v. Moyer

Date: Mar 6, 2024
Affirmation of Dismissal in Eighth Amendment Excessive Force Claim: Landis v. Moyer Introduction The case of Carlton Theodore Landis v. Correctional Officer Chad Moyer; Federal Bureau of Prisons...
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in New Concepts for Living, Inc. v. NLRB

Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in New Concepts for Living, Inc. v. NLRB

Date: Mar 5, 2024
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in New Concepts for Living, Inc. v. NLRB Introduction New Concepts for Living, Inc. ("New Concepts") challenged an order from the National Labor Relations Board...
Limits of Deriving U.S. Citizenship through Common-Law Marriage: Vando Davis v. Attorney General USA

Limits of Deriving U.S. Citizenship through Common-Law Marriage: Vando Davis v. Attorney General USA

Date: Mar 1, 2024
Limits of Deriving U.S. Citizenship through Common-Law Marriage: Vando Davis v. Attorney General USA Introduction The case Damion Glenroy Vando Davis v. Attorney General United States of America...
Implied Private Right of Action Under the New Jersey Cable Television Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Borough of Longport & Township of Irvington v. Netflix, Inc. & Hulu, LLC

Implied Private Right of Action Under the New Jersey Cable Television Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Borough of Longport & Township of Irvington v. Netflix, Inc. & Hulu, LLC

Date: Mar 1, 2024
Implied Private Right of Action Under the New Jersey Cable Television Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Borough of Longport & Township of Irvington v. Netflix, Inc. & Hulu, LLC Introduction The recent...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Fitzgerald v. Amtrak: Implications for Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Fitzgerald v. Amtrak: Implications for Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Date: Feb 27, 2024
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Fitzgerald v. Amtrak: Implications for Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Introduction In the case of David Fitzgerald v. National Railroad Passenger...
Third Circuit Denies Mandamus Relief in Sham Litigation Case, Reinforcing High Threshold for Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege

Third Circuit Denies Mandamus Relief in Sham Litigation Case, Reinforcing High Threshold for Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege

Date: Feb 23, 2024
Third Circuit Denies Mandamus Relief in Sham Litigation Case, Reinforcing High Threshold for Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege Introduction In the case of In re: Abbott Laboratories...
Clarifying 'Acting Under' in Federal-Officer Removal: Mohr v. Trustees of UPenn

Clarifying 'Acting Under' in Federal-Officer Removal: Mohr v. Trustees of UPenn

Date: Feb 22, 2024
Clarifying 'Acting Under' in Federal-Officer Removal: Mohr v. Trustees of UPenn Introduction The case of Johnathon Mohr, for himself and others similarly situated v. Trustees of the University of...
Affirmation of Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Gibson v. Tip Towing and Recovery LLC

Affirmation of Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Gibson v. Tip Towing and Recovery LLC

Date: Feb 17, 2024
Affirmation of Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction in Gibson v. Tip Towing and Recovery LLC Introduction In the case of Rainy Marie Gibson, En Legis, Principal, Appellant v. Tip Towing and Recovery...
Standing Under the FDCPA: Keystone Credit Services v. Paulette Barclift Establishes Criteria for Unauthorized Third-Party Communications

Standing Under the FDCPA: Keystone Credit Services v. Paulette Barclift Establishes Criteria for Unauthorized Third-Party Communications

Date: Feb 17, 2024
Standing Under the FDCPA: Keystone Credit Services v. Paulette Barclift Establishes Criteria for Unauthorized Third-Party Communications Introduction The case of Paulette Barclift v. Keystone Credit...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.