Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Federal Courts Reject New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Federal Courts Reject New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Date: May 14, 1999
Federal Courts Reject New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases Introduction The case of Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta adjudicated by the United...
Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy Reorganization: CoreStates Bank v. Huls America

Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy Reorganization: CoreStates Bank v. Huls America

Date: May 12, 1999
Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy Reorganization: CoreStates Bank v. Huls America Introduction The case CoreStates Bank, N.A. v. Huls America, Inc. (176 F.3d 187) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Contempt Liability Limited to Direct Violations or Aiding and Abetting: Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros

Contempt Liability Limited to Direct Violations or Aiding and Abetting: Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros

Date: May 6, 1999
Contempt Liability Limited to Direct Violations or Aiding and Abetting: Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros Introduction In the case of Max's Seafood Cafe, by Lou-Ann, Inc., Successor to Max's Seafood...
Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege for Attorneys Acting as Consultants: A Third Circuit Analysis in Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corporation

Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege for Attorneys Acting as Consultants: A Third Circuit Analysis in Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corporation

Date: May 1, 1999
Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege for Attorneys Acting as Consultants: A Third Circuit Analysis in Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corporation Introduction The case of Montgomery County,...
Carter v. City of Philadelphia: Limiting Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Administrative Functions

Carter v. City of Philadelphia: Limiting Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Administrative Functions

Date: Apr 29, 1999
Carter v. City of Philadelphia: Limiting Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Administrative Functions Introduction In Carter v. City of Philadelphia, 181 F.3d 339 (3d Cir. 1999), Raymond Carter appealed...
Respondeat Superior Liability in Sexual Harassment Claims under Title VII: Insights from KAREN A. KUNIN v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.

Respondeat Superior Liability in Sexual Harassment Claims under Title VII: Insights from KAREN A. KUNIN v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.

Date: Apr 29, 1999
Respondeat Superior Liability in Sexual Harassment Claims under Title VII: Insights from KAREN A. KUNIN v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. Introduction The case of KAREN A. KUNIN v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.,...
Issue Preclusion and Pennsylvania’s "One Satisfaction" Rule in Asbestos Liability: Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc. et al.

Issue Preclusion and Pennsylvania’s "One Satisfaction" Rule in Asbestos Liability: Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc. et al.

Date: Apr 27, 1999
Issue Preclusion and Pennsylvania’s "One Satisfaction" Rule in Asbestos Liability: Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc. et al. Introduction In the landmark case Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc. et al., the United...
Affirming the Constitutionality of Ex Parte Child Custody Hearings: Miller v. City of Philadelphia

Affirming the Constitutionality of Ex Parte Child Custody Hearings: Miller v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Apr 27, 1999
Affirming the Constitutionality of Ex Parte Child Custody Hearings: Miller v. City of Philadelphia Introduction In Miller v. City of Philadelphia, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Affirmation of AEDPA's Strict Limitations on Amending §2255 Motions: United States v. Clinton Duffus

Affirmation of AEDPA's Strict Limitations on Amending §2255 Motions: United States v. Clinton Duffus

Date: Apr 21, 1999
Affirmation of AEDPA's Strict Limitations on Amending §2255 Motions: United States v. Clinton Duffus Introduction United States v. Clinton Duffus is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Third Circuit Affirms Discretionary Limits on Unredacted Discovery Requests under 28 U.S.C. §1782

Third Circuit Affirms Discretionary Limits on Unredacted Discovery Requests under 28 U.S.C. §1782

Date: Apr 13, 1999
Third Circuit Affirms Discretionary Limits on Unredacted Discovery Requests under 28 U.S.C. §1782 Introduction In the landmark case of Bayer AG v. Betachem, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals...
Safeguarding Fair Trial Rights: The Impact of Prosecutorial Misconduct in United States v. Mastrangelo

Safeguarding Fair Trial Rights: The Impact of Prosecutorial Misconduct in United States v. Mastrangelo

Date: Apr 10, 1999
Safeguarding Fair Trial Rights: The Impact of Prosecutorial Misconduct in United States v. Mastrangelo Introduction The case of United States v. Adrian Mastrangelo, Jr. is a significant judicial...
Equal Protection Violation in Fusion Nominations: Reaffirming Minority Party Rights

Equal Protection Violation in Fusion Nominations: Reaffirming Minority Party Rights

Date: Mar 31, 1999
Equal Protection Violation in Fusion Nominations: Reaffirming Minority Party Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Reform Party of Allegheny County v. Allegheny County Department of Elections,...
Elevating Standards for Free Appropriate Public Education under IDEA: Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E.

Elevating Standards for Free Appropriate Public Education under IDEA: Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E.

Date: Mar 31, 1999
Elevating Standards for Free Appropriate Public Education under IDEA: Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E. Introduction Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E. is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming the Confrontation Clause: McCandless v. Vaughn Establishes Critical Standards for Witness Availability

Reaffirming the Confrontation Clause: McCandless v. Vaughn Establishes Critical Standards for Witness Availability

Date: Mar 31, 1999
Reaffirming the Confrontation Clause: McCandless v. Vaughn Establishes Critical Standards for Witness Availability Introduction Thomas McCandless appealed the District Court's denial of his habeas...
Proximate Cause and Antitrust Standing: Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Union-Welfare Funds vs. Tobacco Companies

Proximate Cause and Antitrust Standing: Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Union-Welfare Funds vs. Tobacco Companies

Date: Mar 30, 1999
Proximate Cause and Antitrust Standing: Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Union-Welfare Funds vs. Tobacco Companies Introduction In Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris,...
Standard of Review for Habeas Corpus Under AEDPA: Insights from Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion

Standard of Review for Habeas Corpus Under AEDPA: Insights from Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion

Date: Mar 25, 1999
Standard of Review for Habeas Corpus Under AEDPA: Insights from Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion Introduction Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion is a seminal case decided by the United States...
Limitations on Fraud and Securities Claims in the Presence of Integration Clauses: Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Compucare Company and Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Limitations on Fraud and Securities Claims in the Presence of Integration Clauses: Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Compucare Company and Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Date: Mar 25, 1999
Limitations on Fraud and Securities Claims in the Presence of Integration Clauses: Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Compucare Company and Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Introduction The case of...
Comprehensive Commentary on Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Department

Comprehensive Commentary on Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Department

Date: Mar 19, 1999
Establishing Supervisory Accountability: An In-Depth Analysis of Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Department Introduction Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Department is a landmark decision by the United...
Third Circuit Establishes Importance of Defendant's Intent in Applying U.S.S.G. Cross-References for Child Pornography Offenses

Third Circuit Establishes Importance of Defendant's Intent in Applying U.S.S.G. Cross-References for Child Pornography Offenses

Date: Mar 19, 1999
Third Circuit Establishes Importance of Defendant's Intent in Applying U.S.S.G. Cross-References for Child Pornography Offenses Introduction The case of United States of America v. Richard C....
Loss of Pooling of Interests Accounting as Irreparable Harm in Corporate Merger Agreements: Allegheny Energy v. DQE

Loss of Pooling of Interests Accounting as Irreparable Harm in Corporate Merger Agreements: Allegheny Energy v. DQE

Date: Mar 12, 1999
Loss of Pooling of Interests Accounting as Irreparable Harm in Corporate Merger Agreements: Allegheny Energy v. DQE Introduction The case of Allegheny Energy, Inc. v. DQE, Inc. (171 F.3d 153)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert