Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

unconstitutionality-of-section-27(3f)-of-the-misuse-of-drugs-act:-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-mcmanus-v.-the-minister-for-justice-and-equality- Case Commentaries

Potanina v Potanin (No. 2): Aligning the Part III Leave Threshold with a “Real Prospect of Success” and confirming (pre‑Brexit) Maintenance Regulation constraints on forum objections

Potanina v Potanin (No. 2): Aligning the Part III Leave Threshold with a “Real Prospect of Success” and confirming (pre‑Brexit) Maintenance Regulation constraints on forum objections

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Potanina v Potanin (No. 2): Aligning the Part III Leave Threshold with a “Real Prospect of Success” and confirming (pre‑Brexit) Maintenance Regulation constraints on forum objections Introduction...
Section 11(7D) as Gatekeeper in Domestic‑Abuse Contact Disputes: Refusal of Even Indirect Contact despite Positive Sessions — SJM v AJD [2025] CSOH 84

Section 11(7D) as Gatekeeper in Domestic‑Abuse Contact Disputes: Refusal of Even Indirect Contact despite Positive Sessions — SJM v AJD [2025] CSOH 84

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Section 11(7D) as Gatekeeper in Domestic‑Abuse Contact Disputes: Refusal of Even Indirect Contact despite Positive Sessions — SJM v AJD [2025] CSOH 84 Citation: SJM v AJD [2025] CSOH 84 (Outer House,...
The McMahon Two‑Stage Approach: Deferred Consideration and Deliberate Dissipation in Valuing and Dividing Business Assets under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985

The McMahon Two‑Stage Approach: Deferred Consideration and Deliberate Dissipation in Valuing and Dividing Business Assets under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985

Date: Sep 6, 2025
The McMahon Two‑Stage Approach: Deferred Consideration and Deliberate Dissipation in Valuing and Dividing Business Assets under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 Introduction In Nicola Drummond or...
EAC v The King: Post‑Retirement Jury Information and Time‑Limited Child‑Cruelty Sentencing — Neutrality, Non‑Prejudice and Downward Adjustment

EAC v The King: Post‑Retirement Jury Information and Time‑Limited Child‑Cruelty Sentencing — Neutrality, Non‑Prejudice and Downward Adjustment

Date: Sep 4, 2025
EAC v The King: Post‑Retirement Jury Information and Time‑Limited Child‑Cruelty Sentencing — Neutrality, Non‑Prejudice and Downward Adjustment Introduction This commentary examines the Court of...
Somani Hotels: Court of Appeal clarifies “desirable” joinder of the Home Secretary and a status‑quo preference for s.187B planning injunctions affecting asylum accommodation

Somani Hotels: Court of Appeal clarifies “desirable” joinder of the Home Secretary and a status‑quo preference for s.187B planning injunctions affecting asylum accommodation

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Somani Hotels: Court of Appeal clarifies “desirable” joinder of the Home Secretary and a status‑quo preference for s.187B planning injunctions affecting asylum accommodation Introduction In Somani...
No English Winding-Up of SICAV “Dedicated Funds”: Compartment Is Not an “Association” under Insolvency Act 1986 s 220

No English Winding-Up of SICAV “Dedicated Funds”: Compartment Is Not an “Association” under Insolvency Act 1986 s 220

Date: Sep 4, 2025
No English Winding-Up of SICAV “Dedicated Funds”: Compartment Is Not an “Association” under Insolvency Act 1986 s 220 Introduction This Court of Appeal decision in East Riding of Yorkshire Council...
Implicit Criminal-Proceedings Leverage as “Unambiguous Impropriety”: High Court admits WPSATC correspondence — QPQ Limited v Schute [2025] IEHC 474

Implicit Criminal-Proceedings Leverage as “Unambiguous Impropriety”: High Court admits WPSATC correspondence — QPQ Limited v Schute [2025] IEHC 474

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Implicit Criminal‑Proceedings Leverage as “Unambiguous Impropriety”: High Court Admits WPSATC Correspondence QPQ Limited v Schute (Approved) [2025] IEHC 474, High Court of Ireland, Commercial List...
Ageing‑Out Does Not Create Sentencing Prejudice: Jurisdiction‑First under s.75 Children Act and Non‑application of s.13 Criminal Law Act 1976 to Children Detention Schools

Ageing‑Out Does Not Create Sentencing Prejudice: Jurisdiction‑First under s.75 Children Act and Non‑application of s.13 Criminal Law Act 1976 to Children Detention Schools

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Ageing‑Out Does Not Create Sentencing Prejudice: Jurisdiction‑First under s.75 Children Act and Non‑application of s.13 Criminal Law Act 1976 to Children Detention Schools Case: K (Aged Out Child) v...
“Payment disputes” under s.6 of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 are confined to contractual payments; common‑law termination damages are not adjudicable — and planning irregularities do not render construction contracts void

“Payment disputes” under s.6 of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 are confined to contractual payments; common‑law termination damages are not adjudicable — and planning irregularities do not render construction contracts void

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Payment disputes” under s.6 of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 are confined to contractual payments; common‑law termination damages are not adjudicable — and planning irregularities do not...
Article 5 ECHR, Extended Sentences and Rehabilitation: A Nine‑Month Post‑Custodial Delay Does Not Cross the Arbitrariness Threshold — AB v Scottish Ministers [2025] CSOH 82

Article 5 ECHR, Extended Sentences and Rehabilitation: A Nine‑Month Post‑Custodial Delay Does Not Cross the Arbitrariness Threshold — AB v Scottish Ministers [2025] CSOH 82

Date: Sep 3, 2025
Article 5 ECHR, Extended Sentences and Rehabilitation: A Nine‑Month Post‑Custodial Delay Does Not Cross the Arbitrariness Threshold — AB v Scottish Ministers [2025] CSOH 82 Introduction This...
Clarifying the Youth‑Maxima Ceiling and Permissible Use of Adult Guideline Starting Points in Historic Child‑Perpetrated Sexual Offences: Commentary on VPT, R v [2025] EWCA Crim 1187

Clarifying the Youth‑Maxima Ceiling and Permissible Use of Adult Guideline Starting Points in Historic Child‑Perpetrated Sexual Offences: Commentary on VPT, R v [2025] EWCA Crim 1187

Date: Sep 3, 2025
Clarifying the Youth‑Maxima Ceiling and Permissible Use of Adult Guideline Starting Points in Historic Child‑Perpetrated Sexual Offences Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal...
Fletcher: Indefinite, Digitally‑Tailored Non‑Harassment Orders and Compensation as Core Sentencing Tools in Serious Domestic Abuse; Custody Still a Last Resort for First‑Time Adult Offenders

Fletcher: Indefinite, Digitally‑Tailored Non‑Harassment Orders and Compensation as Core Sentencing Tools in Serious Domestic Abuse; Custody Still a Last Resort for First‑Time Adult Offenders

Date: Sep 1, 2025
Fletcher: Indefinite, Digitally‑Tailored Non‑Harassment Orders and Compensation as Core Sentencing Tools in Serious Domestic Abuse; Custody Still a Last Resort for First‑Time Adult Offenders...
No duty on an interdictee to “mitigate” by seeking recall: continuing wrong, damages and interest in wrongful interdict – Commentary on Martin McGowan v Springfield Properties PLC [2025] CSOH 81

No duty on an interdictee to “mitigate” by seeking recall: continuing wrong, damages and interest in wrongful interdict – Commentary on Martin McGowan v Springfield Properties PLC [2025] CSOH 81

Date: Sep 1, 2025
No duty on an interdictee to “mitigate” by seeking recall: continuing wrong, damages and interest in wrongful interdict – McGowan v Springfield Properties PLC [2025] CSOH 81 Introduction This Outer...
In‑Proceedings Reporting Restrictions at Common Law: PMC v A Local Health Board [2025] EWCA Civ 1126

In‑Proceedings Reporting Restrictions at Common Law: PMC v A Local Health Board [2025] EWCA Civ 1126

Date: Aug 31, 2025
In‑Proceedings Reporting Restrictions at Common Law: PMC v A Local Health Board [2025] EWCA Civ 1126 Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in PMC v A Local Health Board ([2025] EWCA Civ 1126)...
R v Mercer [2025] EWCA Crim 1197: Caring Motives Do Not Mitigate Persistent Breaches of Protective Orders; Remand Credit Clarified and Uplifts for Multiple Breaches Affirmed

R v Mercer [2025] EWCA Crim 1197: Caring Motives Do Not Mitigate Persistent Breaches of Protective Orders; Remand Credit Clarified and Uplifts for Multiple Breaches Affirmed

Date: Aug 30, 2025
R v Mercer [2025] EWCA Crim 1197: Caring Motives Do Not Mitigate Persistent Breaches of Protective Orders; Remand Credit Clarified and Uplifts for Multiple Breaches Affirmed England and Wales Court...
R v ICG [2025] EWCA Crim 1196: Limited Discount for Attempted Rape Where Completion Was Thwarted by Interruption, With Lead-Count Uplift to Reflect Concurrent Penetrative Offences; Consecutive Sentences for Distinct Episodes Reaffirmed

R v ICG [2025] EWCA Crim 1196: Limited Discount for Attempted Rape Where Completion Was Thwarted by Interruption, With Lead-Count Uplift to Reflect Concurrent Penetrative Offences; Consecutive Sentences for Distinct Episodes Reaffirmed

Date: Aug 30, 2025
R v ICG [2025] EWCA Crim 1196: Limited Discount for Attempted Rape Where Completion Was Thwarted by Interruption, With Lead-Count Uplift to Reflect Concurrent Penetrative Offences; Consecutive...
R v Peters [2025] EWCA Crim 1175: Standalone violent disorder in a fatal incident—Category 1A (4‑year) starting point affirmed and no parity with “academic” concurrent sentences

R v Peters [2025] EWCA Crim 1175: Standalone violent disorder in a fatal incident—Category 1A (4‑year) starting point affirmed and no parity with “academic” concurrent sentences

Date: Aug 28, 2025
R v Peters [2025] EWCA Crim 1175: Standalone violent disorder in a fatal incident—Category 1A (4‑year) starting point affirmed and no parity with “academic” concurrent sentences Court: England and...
Judicial Review Is Not a Shortcut to Halt Pending Prosecutions: High Court Reaffirms Exceptional Nature of Prohibition and Routes Wrongful-Arrest Grievances to Plenary Actions

Judicial Review Is Not a Shortcut to Halt Pending Prosecutions: High Court Reaffirms Exceptional Nature of Prohibition and Routes Wrongful-Arrest Grievances to Plenary Actions

Date: Aug 27, 2025
Judicial Review Is Not a Shortcut to Halt Pending Prosecutions: High Court Reaffirms Exceptional Nature of Prohibition and Routes Wrongful-Arrest Grievances to Plenary Actions Decision commented on:...
No Shortcut to Trial: LSRA observations do not shift the plaintiff’s burden and a defendant’s pleaded case must be taken at its highest on strike‑out motions (Monarca v Hayes Solicitors LLP [2025] IEHC 472)

No Shortcut to Trial: LSRA observations do not shift the plaintiff’s burden and a defendant’s pleaded case must be taken at its highest on strike‑out motions (Monarca v Hayes Solicitors LLP [2025] IEHC 472)

Date: Aug 27, 2025
No Shortcut to Trial: LSRA observations do not shift the plaintiff’s burden and a defendant’s pleaded case must be taken at its highest on strike‑out motions Commentary on Monarca v Hayes Solicitors...
Finality Means Final: High Court reaffirms s.39 Courts of Justice Act 1936 applies to interlocutory and procedural orders on Circuit appeals; possession granted notwithstanding securitisation and transfer challenges

Finality Means Final: High Court reaffirms s.39 Courts of Justice Act 1936 applies to interlocutory and procedural orders on Circuit appeals; possession granted notwithstanding securitisation and transfer challenges

Date: Aug 27, 2025
“Finality Means Final” on Circuit Appeals: The High Court confirms s.39 CJA 1936 forecloses later attacks on its appellate orders and grants possession despite securitisation and transfer objections...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert