Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Of India Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Public Service Commission's Autonomy in Recruitment Processes

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Public Service Commission's Autonomy in Recruitment Processes

Date: Dec 22, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Public Service Commission's Autonomy in Recruitment Processes Introduction On December 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in the case...
Supreme Court Establishes Liability for Post-Operative Medical Negligence: Bherulal Bhimaji Oswal v. Madhusudan N. Kumbhare (2024)

Supreme Court Establishes Liability for Post-Operative Medical Negligence: Bherulal Bhimaji Oswal v. Madhusudan N. Kumbhare (2024)

Date: Dec 22, 2024
Supreme Court Establishes Liability for Post-Operative Medical Negligence: Bherulal Bhimaji Oswal v. Madhusudan N. Kumbhare (2024 INSC 1035) Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark...
Invalid Delegation of Toll-Levying Powers to Private Entities Without Statutory Authority: A Critical Analysis of NOIDA Toll Bridge Company Ltd. v. Federation of NOIDA Residents Welfare Association and Others (2024 INSC 1027)

Invalid Delegation of Toll-Levying Powers to Private Entities Without Statutory Authority: A Critical Analysis of NOIDA Toll Bridge Company Ltd. v. Federation of NOIDA Residents Welfare Association and Others (2024 INSC 1027)

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Invalid Delegation of Toll-Levying Powers to Private Entities Without Statutory Authority: A Critical Analysis of NOIDA Toll Bridge Company Ltd. v. Federation of NOIDA Residents Welfare Association...
Supreme Court Recognizes Guarantees Within Deeds of Hypothecation, Affirms Financial Creditor Status under IBC

Supreme Court Recognizes Guarantees Within Deeds of Hypothecation, Affirms Financial Creditor Status under IBC

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Supreme Court Recognizes Guarantees Within Deeds of Hypothecation, Affirms Financial Creditor Status under IBC Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in a landmark judgment delivered on December...
Reaffirming the Non-Quashability of Economic Offences Under the Prevention of Corruption Act Despite Settlement: Analysis of Anil Bhavarlal Jain v. State of Maharashtra (2024 INSC 1039)

Reaffirming the Non-Quashability of Economic Offences Under the Prevention of Corruption Act Despite Settlement: Analysis of Anil Bhavarlal Jain v. State of Maharashtra (2024 INSC 1039)

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Reaffirming the Non-Quashability of Economic Offences Under the Prevention of Corruption Act Despite Settlement: Analysis of Anil Bhavarlal Jain v. State of Maharashtra (2024 INSC 1039) Introduction...
Litigants Should Not Suffer for Counsel's Default: Supreme Court in Dwarika Prasad v. Prithvi Raj Singh (2024 INSC 1030)

Litigants Should Not Suffer for Counsel's Default: Supreme Court in Dwarika Prasad v. Prithvi Raj Singh (2024 INSC 1030)

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Litigants Should Not Suffer for Counsel's Default: Supreme Court in Dwarika Prasad v. Prithvi Raj Singh (2024 INSC 1030) Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in its landmark judgment of Dwarika...
Regularization of Long-Term Temporary Employees Performing Essential Functions: Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Jaggo v. Union of India (2024 INSC 1034)

Regularization of Long-Term Temporary Employees Performing Essential Functions: Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Jaggo v. Union of India (2024 INSC 1034)

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Regularization of Long-Term Temporary Employees Performing Essential Functions: Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Jaggo v. Union of India (2024 INSC 1034) Case: Jaggo v. Union of India & Ors....
Authorized Signatory Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act Without Company Being Accused: Supreme Court's Precedent Established in Bijoy Kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna

Authorized Signatory Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act Without Company Being Accused: Supreme Court's Precedent Established in Bijoy Kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Authorized Signatory Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act Without Company Being Accused: Supreme Court's Precedent Established in Bijoy Kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court Clarifies Rejection of Time-Barred Suits Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC: Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimat Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Bhonsle

Supreme Court Clarifies Rejection of Time-Barred Suits Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC: Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimat Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Bhonsle

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Rejection of Time-Barred Suits Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC: Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimat Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Bhonsle (2024 INSC 1025) Introduction The Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty and Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees: Mukesh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024 INSC 1026)

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty and Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees: Mukesh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024 INSC 1026)

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty and Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees: Mukesh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024 INSC 1026) Supreme Court of India | Decided on December 20, 2024...
Clarifying Jurisdiction: Civil Courts' Authority in Partition Suits under Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886

Clarifying Jurisdiction: Civil Courts' Authority in Partition Suits under Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Clarifying Jurisdiction: Civil Courts' Authority in Partition Suits under Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Abdul Rejak Laskar v. Mafizur...
Clarification on Limitation Periods and Amendment of Pleadings at Appellate Stage: Supreme Court's Judgment in MALLAVVA v. KALSAMMANAVARA KALAMMA (2024 INSC 1021)

Clarification on Limitation Periods and Amendment of Pleadings at Appellate Stage: Supreme Court's Judgment in MALLAVVA v. KALSAMMANAVARA KALAMMA (2024 INSC 1021)

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Clarification on Limitation Periods and Amendment of Pleadings at Appellate Stage: Supreme Court's Judgment in MALLAVVA v. KALSAMMANAVARA KALAMMA (2024 INSC 1021) Introduction The Supreme Court of...
A New Deterrent to Frivolous Litigation: Supreme Court Imposes Heavy Costs to Curb Misuse of Judicial Process

A New Deterrent to Frivolous Litigation: Supreme Court Imposes Heavy Costs to Curb Misuse of Judicial Process

Date: Dec 21, 2024
A New Deterrent to Frivolous Litigation: Supreme Court Imposes Heavy Costs to Curb Misuse of Judicial Process Introduction The case of Pandurang Vithal Kevne v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (2024...
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Hardship Under Section 20(2)(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 in Granting Specific Performance

Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Hardship Under Section 20(2)(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 in Granting Specific Performance

Date: Dec 20, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Hardship Under Section 20(2)(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 in Granting Specific Performance Introduction In the landmark case of Parswanath Saha v....
Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Quashing Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Disputes Involving Section 498-A IPC: DIGAMBAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (2024 INSC 1019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Quashing Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Disputes Involving Section 498-A IPC: DIGAMBAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (2024 INSC 1019)

Date: Dec 20, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Quashing Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Disputes Involving Section 498-A IPC: DIGAMBAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (2024 INSC 1019) Introduction The Supreme...
Supreme Court Clarifies Proximity Requirement in Abetment of Suicide under Section 306 IPC: Prakash v. State of Maharashtra (2024 INSC 1020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Proximity Requirement in Abetment of Suicide under Section 306 IPC: Prakash v. State of Maharashtra (2024 INSC 1020)

Date: Dec 20, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Proximity Requirement in Abetment of Suicide under Section 306 IPC: Prakash v. State of Maharashtra (2024 INSC 1020) Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in its landmark...
“Discretion under Section 148 of the NI Act: Supreme Court’s New Guidance”

“Discretion under Section 148 of the NI Act: Supreme Court’s New Guidance”

Date: Dec 20, 2024
Discretion under Section 148 of the NI Act: Supreme Court’s New Guidance Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Muskan Enterprises v. The State of Punjab (2024 INSC 1046) offers a...
Confession of Co-Accused Insufficient for Framing Charges under NDPS Act: Karan Talwar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2024 INSC 1012)

Confession of Co-Accused Insufficient for Framing Charges under NDPS Act: Karan Talwar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2024 INSC 1012)

Date: Dec 19, 2024
Confession of Co-Accused Insufficient for Framing Charges under NDPS Act: Karan Talwar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2024 INSC 1012) Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in its landmark judgment in...
Reaffirming the Limited Scope of High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction in Discharge Applications: Supreme Court Emphasizes Primacy of Trial Courts in Framing Charges under Section 239 Cr.P.C.

Reaffirming the Limited Scope of High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction in Discharge Applications: Supreme Court Emphasizes Primacy of Trial Courts in Framing Charges under Section 239 Cr.P.C.

Date: Dec 19, 2024
Reaffirming the Limited Scope of High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction in Discharge Applications: Supreme Court Emphasizes Primacy of Trial Courts in Framing Charges under Section 239 Cr.P.C....
Supreme Court Clarifies Burden of Accused under Section 106 Evidence Act in Domestic Homicide Cases: Ashok Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh (2024 INSC 1011)

Supreme Court Clarifies Burden of Accused under Section 106 Evidence Act in Domestic Homicide Cases: Ashok Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh (2024 INSC 1011)

Date: Dec 19, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Burden of Accused under Section 106 Evidence Act in Domestic Homicide Cases: Ashok Verma v. The State of Chhattisgarh (2024 INSC 1011) Introduction In the landmark case of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert