Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Of India Case Commentaries

Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific

Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific Introduction This commentary examines...
Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181

Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181 Introduction This Supreme...
CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC in Kalyani Transco v. BPSL (2025 INSC 1165)

CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC in Kalyani Transco v. BPSL (2025 INSC 1165)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC Case: KALYANI TRANSCO v. M/S BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD. & Ors....
Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on Undertaking

Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on Undertaking

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on...
Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases

Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases Case: SANJABIJ TARI v. KISHORE S....
Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific Performance

Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific Performance

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific...
Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment

Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment Introduction This commentary...
Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under Section 35

Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under Section 35

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under...
Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design

Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design Introduction In M/s U.P. Asbestos Limited v....
Party Autonomy Trumps Statutory Post‑Award Interest: No Compound or Additional Interest Where Award Grants Contractual Interest “Till Repayment” under Section 31(7)

Party Autonomy Trumps Statutory Post‑Award Interest: No Compound or Additional Interest Where Award Grants Contractual Interest “Till Repayment” under Section 31(7)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Party Autonomy Trumps Statutory Post‑Award Interest: No Compound or Additional Interest Where Award Grants Contractual Interest “Till Repayment” under Section 31(7) Case: HLV Limited (formerly Hotel...
Lex Specialis Prevails: No Waiver of Public‑Interest Cultivation Conditions under the Organização Agrária; Pending OA Proceedings Saved Despite the 1971 Land Reforms Regulation

Lex Specialis Prevails: No Waiver of Public‑Interest Cultivation Conditions under the Organização Agrária; Pending OA Proceedings Saved Despite the 1971 Land Reforms Regulation

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Lex Specialis Prevails: No Waiver of Public‑Interest Cultivation Conditions under the Organização Agrária; Pending OA Proceedings Saved Despite the 1971 Land Reforms Regulation Introduction This...
Retaliatory FIRs in Civil/Commercial Disputes: Supreme Court Reaffirms Bhajan Lal and Clarifies Post-Charge-Sheet Quashing under Section 482 CrPC (Anukul Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025 INSC 1153)

Retaliatory FIRs in Civil/Commercial Disputes: Supreme Court Reaffirms Bhajan Lal and Clarifies Post-Charge-Sheet Quashing under Section 482 CrPC (Anukul Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025 INSC 1153)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Retaliatory FIRs in Civil/Commercial Disputes: Supreme Court Reaffirms Bhajan Lal and Clarifies Post-Charge-Sheet Quashing under Section 482 CrPC Case: ANUKUL SINGH v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH...
No Second SLP After Unconditional Withdrawal: Supreme Court Reaffirms Upadhyay Principle and Fortifies Finality Under Article 136

No Second SLP After Unconditional Withdrawal: Supreme Court Reaffirms Upadhyay Principle and Fortifies Finality Under Article 136

Date: Sep 24, 2025
7 CPC against appeals from review refusals."> No Second SLP After Unconditional Withdrawal: Supreme Court Reaffirms Upadhyay Principle and Fortifies Finality Under Article 136 Introduction In a...
Inside-the-Station Confessions Are Inadmissible: Supreme Court reins in Section 106 in circumstantial cases and cautions against joint Section 27 recoveries

Inside-the-Station Confessions Are Inadmissible: Supreme Court reins in Section 106 in circumstantial cases and cautions against joint Section 27 recoveries

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Inside-the-Station Confessions Are Inadmissible: Supreme Court reins in Section 106 in circumstantial cases and cautions against joint Section 27 recoveries Case: Nagamma @ Nagarathna & Ors. v. State...
Single-Notice Rule and Extinction of Redemption on Publication: Supreme Court’s Definitive Construction of Amended Section 13(8) SARFAESI

Single-Notice Rule and Extinction of Redemption on Publication: Supreme Court’s Definitive Construction of Amended Section 13(8) SARFAESI

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Single-Notice Rule and Extinction of Redemption on Publication: Supreme Court’s Definitive Construction of Amended Section 13(8) SARFAESI Case: M. Rajendran & Ors. v. M/s KPK Oils and Proteins India...
Player Representation, Promotion–Relegation, and Non‑Delegable “Essential Aspects” of Football Governance: The Supreme Court’s Blueprint for AIFF and its State Units

Player Representation, Promotion–Relegation, and Non‑Delegable “Essential Aspects” of Football Governance: The Supreme Court’s Blueprint for AIFF and its State Units

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Player Representation, Promotion–Relegation, and Non‑Delegable “Essential Aspects” of Football Governance: The Supreme Court’s Blueprint for AIFF and its State Units Case: All India Football...
Strict Identity Rule for Section 138 NI Act Notices: “Said Amount” Must Exactly Equal the Cheque Amount; Typographical Errors Not Excused

Strict Identity Rule for Section 138 NI Act Notices: “Said Amount” Must Exactly Equal the Cheque Amount; Typographical Errors Not Excused

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Strict Identity Rule for Section 138 NI Act Notices: “Said Amount” Must Exactly Equal the Cheque Amount; Typographical Errors Not Excused Case: Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul, 2025...
Portability-Induced Re-engineering Is “Manufacture” under Section 2(f): Containerised Gensets Held to Be New, Distinct Goods

Portability-Induced Re-engineering Is “Manufacture” under Section 2(f): Containerised Gensets Held to Be New, Distinct Goods

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Portability-Induced Re-engineering Is “Manufacture” under Section 2(f): Containerised Gensets Held to Be New, Distinct Goods Case: M/s. Quippo Energy Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise,...
Parens patriae over comity: Supreme Court mandates JJ-system monitoring and structured interim custody in cross-border child disputes

Parens patriae over comity: Supreme Court mandates JJ-system monitoring and structured interim custody in cross-border child disputes

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Parens patriae over comity: Supreme Court mandates JJ-system monitoring and structured interim custody in cross-border child disputes Case: Komal Krishan Arora & Ors. v. Sandeep Kumar & Ors., 2025...
Bachat land is not “shamilat deh”: Supreme Court reaffirms proprietors’ title; vesting follows reservation in the consolidation scheme (not mere revenue entries) and the doctrine of stare decisis applies

Bachat land is not “shamilat deh”: Supreme Court reaffirms proprietors’ title; vesting follows reservation in the consolidation scheme (not mere revenue entries) and the doctrine of stare decisis applies

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Bachat land is not “shamilat deh”: Supreme Court reaffirms proprietors’ title; vesting follows reservation in the consolidation scheme (not mere revenue entries) and the doctrine of stare decisis...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert