Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation: Clarifying Sanction Requirements in Corruption Prosecutions

Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation: Clarifying Sanction Requirements in Corruption Prosecutions

Date: Aug 30, 2011
Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation: Clarifying Sanction Requirements in Corruption Prosecutions Introduction The case of Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation, adjudicated by the...
Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors: Court Fees in Joint Writ Petitions

Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors: Court Fees in Joint Writ Petitions

Date: Jul 28, 2011
Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors: Court Fees in Joint Writ Petitions Introduction The case of Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors, adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on July 27,...
Substantial Compliance and Judicial Restraint in Public Tender Procedures: Insights from Tejas Construction v. Municipal Council

Substantial Compliance and Judicial Restraint in Public Tender Procedures: Insights from Tejas Construction v. Municipal Council

Date: May 21, 2011
Substantial Compliance and Judicial Restraint in Public Tender Procedures: Insights from Tejas Construction v. Municipal Council Introduction The case of Tejas Construction And Infrastructure Pvt....
State Rule-Making Powers in Motor Vehicles Regulation: Shaheed Khan v. State Of M.P and Others

State Rule-Making Powers in Motor Vehicles Regulation: Shaheed Khan v. State Of M.P and Others

Date: May 19, 2011
State Rule-Making Powers in Motor Vehicles Regulation: Shaheed Khan v. State Of M.P and Others Introduction The case of Shaheed Khan And Others v. State Of M.P And Others was adjudicated by the...
Judicial Oversight and the Necessity of Reasoned Decisions in Detention Under NSA: Commentary on 'State Of M.P And Another v. Union Of India And Another'

Judicial Oversight and the Necessity of Reasoned Decisions in Detention Under NSA: Commentary on 'State Of M.P And Another v. Union Of India And Another'

Date: May 12, 2011
Judicial Oversight and the Necessity of Reasoned Decisions in Detention Under NSA: Commentary on State Of M.P And Another v. Union Of India And Another Introduction The case of State Of M.P And...
Eligibility Criteria for Pension Under MP Pension Rules: Insights from Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others

Eligibility Criteria for Pension Under MP Pension Rules: Insights from Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others

Date: Apr 20, 2011
Eligibility Criteria for Pension Under MP Pension Rules: Insights from Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others Introduction The case of Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by the...
Eligibility Criteria for Family Pension: Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Others

Eligibility Criteria for Family Pension: Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Others

Date: Apr 20, 2011
Eligibility Criteria for Family Pension: Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Others Introduction The case of Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others was adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Mandatory Compliance with Section 23-B of M.P Accommodation Control Act: A Landmark Judgment

Mandatory Compliance with Section 23-B of M.P Accommodation Control Act: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Feb 25, 2011
Mandatory Compliance with Section 23-B of M.P Accommodation Control Act: A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Tilakraj Sharma v. Shyamabai Tiwari before the Madhya Pradesh High Court,...
Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Judgment: Investment Utilization under Section 32AB of the IT Act

Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Judgment: Investment Utilization under Section 32AB of the IT Act

Date: Feb 23, 2011
Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Judgment: Investment Utilization under Section 32AB of the IT Act Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. adjudicated by the Madhya...
Recognition of UGC-Registered Institutions and Employment Exchange Registration in Public Selection Examinations: Ved Prakash Sharma v. State of M.P.

Recognition of UGC-Registered Institutions and Employment Exchange Registration in Public Selection Examinations: Ved Prakash Sharma v. State of M.P.

Date: Jan 22, 2011
Recognition of UGC-Registered Institutions and Employment Exchange Registration in Public Selection Examinations Introduction The case of Ved Prakash Sharma And Others v. State Of M.P And Others...
M.P. State Electricity Board v. Union Of India: High Court's Ruling on Condonation of Delay Amid Organizational Bifurcation

M.P. State Electricity Board v. Union Of India: High Court's Ruling on Condonation of Delay Amid Organizational Bifurcation

Date: Jan 5, 2011
M.P. State Electricity Board v. Union Of India: High Court's Ruling on Condonation of Delay Amid Organizational Bifurcation Introduction The case of M/S M.P. State Electricity Board, Jbp v. Union Of...
High Court Upholds Validity of Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy Amendments in Narmada Bachao Andolan Petitioner v. State Of Madhya Pradesh

High Court Upholds Validity of Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy Amendments in Narmada Bachao Andolan Petitioner v. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Dec 17, 2010
High Court Upholds Validity of Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy Amendments in Narmada Bachao Andolan Petitioner v. State Of Madhya Pradesh Introduction The case of Narmada Bachao Andolan...
Establishing Liability Under Central Excise Act Requires Concrete Evidence: Analysis of Union of India v. M.S.S. Foods Products Ltd.

Establishing Liability Under Central Excise Act Requires Concrete Evidence: Analysis of Union of India v. M.S.S. Foods Products Ltd.

Date: Nov 20, 2010
Establishing Liability Under Central Excise Act Requires Concrete Evidence: Analysis of Union of India v. M.S.S. Foods Products Ltd. Judgment Introduction The case of Union of India v. M.S.S. Foods...
Requirement of Sufficient Evidence for Levying Excise Duty: Union Of India v. M.S.S Foods Products Ltd.

Requirement of Sufficient Evidence for Levying Excise Duty: Union Of India v. M.S.S Foods Products Ltd.

Date: Nov 20, 2010
Requirement of Sufficient Evidence for Levying Excise Duty: Union Of India v. M.S.S Foods Products Ltd. Introduction The case of Union Of India v. M.S.S Foods Products Ltd. adjudicated by the Madhya...
Establishing Genuineness of Share Application Money under Section 68: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Stl Extrusion P. Ltd.

Establishing Genuineness of Share Application Money under Section 68: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Stl Extrusion P. Ltd.

Date: Oct 26, 2010
Establishing Genuineness of Share Application Money under Section 68: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Stl Extrusion P. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Stl...
Impact of Delay and Laches on Mining Lease Applications: Focus Energy Ltd. v. Government of India

Impact of Delay and Laches on Mining Lease Applications: Focus Energy Ltd. v. Government of India

Date: Sep 30, 2010
Impact of Delay and Laches on Mining Lease Applications: Focus Energy Ltd. v. Government of India Introduction The case of Focus Energy Ltd. v. Government of India and Others, adjudicated by the...
Ad Valorem Court Fee Not Applicable in Declaration Suits Alleging Void Instruments: Sunil v. Awadh Narayan

Ad Valorem Court Fee Not Applicable in Declaration Suits Alleging Void Instruments: Sunil v. Awadh Narayan

Date: Sep 9, 2010
Ad Valorem Court Fee Not Applicable in Declaration Suits Alleging Void Instruments: Sunil v. Awadh Narayan Introduction The case of Sunil v. Awadh Narayan adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court...
Suo Motu Revision Powers: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Ruling

Suo Motu Revision Powers: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Ruling

Date: Aug 31, 2010
Suo Motu Revision Powers: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Ruling Introduction In the case of Ranveer Singh Since Dead Through L.Rs Kishori Singh And Others v. State Of M.P., the Madhya Pradesh...
MP High Court Upholds Pension Eligibility for Regularized Gangmen: State Of M.P. v. Mohammad Sadiq

MP High Court Upholds Pension Eligibility for Regularized Gangmen: State Of M.P. v. Mohammad Sadiq

Date: Aug 13, 2010
MP High Court Upholds Pension Eligibility for Regularized Gangmen: State Of M.P. v. Mohammad Sadiq Introduction The case of State Of M.P And Others v. Mohammad Sadiq (Madhya Pradesh High Court,...
Establishing Eligibility for Family Pension Based on Regularized Service: Rahisha Begum v. State Of M.P.

Establishing Eligibility for Family Pension Based on Regularized Service: Rahisha Begum v. State Of M.P.

Date: Aug 13, 2010
Establishing Eligibility for Family Pension Based on Regularized Service: Rahisha Begum v. State Of M.P. Introduction Rahisha Begum v. State Of M.P. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madhya...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert