Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

No Intention to Murder: High Court Revises Charges in Anil Alias Noni Panda Case

No Intention to Murder: High Court Revises Charges in Anil Alias Noni Panda Case

Date: Apr 14, 2012
No Intention to Murder: High Court Revises Charges in Anil Alias Noni Panda Case Introduction The case of Anil Alias Noni Panda & Anr. v. State Of M.P adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on...
Reaffirming the Sanctity of Electoral Procedures: Hanumant Singh v. State Of M.P And Others

Reaffirming the Sanctity of Electoral Procedures: Hanumant Singh v. State Of M.P And Others

Date: Mar 14, 2012
Reaffirming the Sanctity of Electoral Procedures: Hanumant Singh v. State Of M.P And Others Introduction The case of Hanumant Singh v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Culpable Homicide Reclassified: Bherusingh v. State Of M.P. Establishes Nuanced Interpretation of IPC Section 304 Part-I

Culpable Homicide Reclassified: Bherusingh v. State Of M.P. Establishes Nuanced Interpretation of IPC Section 304 Part-I

Date: Mar 14, 2012
Culpable Homicide Reclassified: Bherusingh v. State Of M.P. Establishes Nuanced Interpretation of IPC Section 304 Part-I Introduction The case of Bherusingh v. State Of M.P. adjudicated by the Madhya...
Strengthening Standards for Circumstantial Evidence: Vrijlal Ghosi & Another v. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Strengthening Standards for Circumstantial Evidence: Vrijlal Ghosi & Another v. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Feb 29, 2012
Strengthening Standards for Circumstantial Evidence: Vrijlal Ghosi & Another v. State Of Madhya Pradesh Introduction The case of Vrijlal Ghosi & Another v. State Of Madhya Pradesh adjudicated by the...
Determination of Seniority for Probationers in Madhya Pradesh Civil Services

Determination of Seniority for Probationers in Madhya Pradesh Civil Services

Date: Feb 18, 2012
Determination of Seniority for Probationers in Madhya Pradesh Civil Services Introduction The case of Masood Akhtar v. R.K.Tripathi adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on February 17, 2012,...
Ramniwas v. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter: Jurisdictional Boundaries in Forest Offence Seizures

Ramniwas v. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter: Jurisdictional Boundaries in Forest Offence Seizures

Date: Feb 4, 2012
Ramniwas v. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter: Jurisdictional Boundaries in Forest Offence Seizures Introduction The case of Ramniwas v. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter...
Recognition of Emergency Appointments as Regular Appointments under MP Recruitment Rules

Recognition of Emergency Appointments as Regular Appointments under MP Recruitment Rules

Date: Feb 3, 2012
Recognition of Emergency Appointments as Regular Appointments under MP Recruitment Rules Introduction The case of Deepak Sahu & Ors. v. State Of M.P. adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on...
Impact of State Of M.P And Another v. Puranlal Nahir on Post-Retirement Disciplinary Proceedings

Impact of State Of M.P And Another v. Puranlal Nahir on Post-Retirement Disciplinary Proceedings

Date: Jan 25, 2012
Impact of State Of M.P And Another v. Puranlal Nahir on Post-Retirement Disciplinary Proceedings Introduction The case of State Of Madhya Pradesh And Another v. Puranlal Nahir adjudicated by the...
Binding Nature of AICTE Regulations on Grant-Aided Technical Institutions: Madhav Institute Of Technology And Science v. Prof. Y.P Singh

Binding Nature of AICTE Regulations on Grant-Aided Technical Institutions: Madhav Institute Of Technology And Science v. Prof. Y.P Singh

Date: Jan 13, 2012
Binding Nature of AICTE Regulations on Grant-Aided Technical Institutions: Madhav Institute Of Technology And Science v. Prof. Y.P Singh Introduction The case of Madhav Institute Of Technology And...
Doctrine of Equal Pay and Compensation Adequacy: Insights from Gopal Chawala v. State of M.P

Doctrine of Equal Pay and Compensation Adequacy: Insights from Gopal Chawala v. State of M.P

Date: Dec 14, 2011
Doctrine of Equal Pay and Compensation Adequacy: Insights from Gopal Chawala v. State of M.P Introduction The case of Gopal Chawala and Others v. State Of Madhya Pradesh and Others addresses the...
Setback of Section 307 IPC in Achhelal Choudhary & Others v. State of M.P.: A Landmark Judgment

Setback of Section 307 IPC in Achhelal Choudhary & Others v. State of M.P.: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Dec 8, 2011
Setback of Section 307 IPC in Achhelal Choudhary & Others v. State of M.P.: A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Achhelal Choudhary & 3 Others v. State of M.P. adjudicated by the Madhya...
Recognition of Home Guards as Regular Establishment: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Decision

Recognition of Home Guards as Regular Establishment: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Decision

Date: Dec 3, 2011
Recognition of Home Guards as Regular Establishment: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Decision Introduction The case of Home Guard Sainik Evam Parivar Kalyan Sangh And Others v. State Of Madhya...
MP High Court Upholds Superannuation Age of 62 for School Teachers in Ku. Sikander Shabana v. State of Madhya Pradesh

MP High Court Upholds Superannuation Age of 62 for School Teachers in Ku. Sikander Shabana v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Dec 2, 2011
MP High Court Upholds Superannuation Age of 62 for School Teachers in Ku. Sikander Shabana v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Introduction The case of Ku. Sikander Shabana v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh...
Affirming Ad Valorem Court Fees for Claimant Appeals: Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P

Affirming Ad Valorem Court Fees for Claimant Appeals: Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P

Date: Nov 19, 2011
Affirming Ad Valorem Court Fees for Claimant Appeals: Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P Introduction The case of Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on...
Due Process in Lease Cancellation: Sajni v. Indore Development Authority

Due Process in Lease Cancellation: Sajni v. Indore Development Authority

Date: Nov 9, 2011
Due Process in Lease Cancellation: Sajni v. Indore Development Authority Introduction The case of Sajni v. Indore Development Authority adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on November 8,...
Mandate on Retirement Age in Grant-in-Aid Technical Institutions: Y.P Singh v. State of M.P.

Mandate on Retirement Age in Grant-in-Aid Technical Institutions: Y.P Singh v. State of M.P.

Date: Oct 22, 2011
Mandate on Retirement Age in Grant-in-Aid Technical Institutions: Y.P Singh v. State of M.P. Introduction The case of Y.P Singh (Prof.) v. State Of M.P And Others was adjudicated by the Madhya...
Establishing Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Dinesh v. Shantibai

Establishing Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Dinesh v. Shantibai

Date: Oct 21, 2011
Establishing Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Dinesh v. Shantibai Introduction Dinesh v. Shantibai is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on October 20, 2011. This case...
Settlement Enforcement Under SARFAESI Act: Insights from Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India

Settlement Enforcement Under SARFAESI Act: Insights from Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India

Date: Oct 21, 2011
Settlement Enforcement Under SARFAESI Act: Insights from Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India Introduction The case of Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India And Others adjudicated by the...
MP High Court Establishes Retirement Age of 60 for Daily Wager Employees

MP High Court Establishes Retirement Age of 60 for Daily Wager Employees

Date: Sep 8, 2011
MP High Court Establishes Retirement Age of 60 for Daily Wager Employees Introduction The case of Badri v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on September 7, 2011,...
Strict Limitation Period Enforced Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act: No Power to Condon Delays

Strict Limitation Period Enforced Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act: No Power to Condon Delays

Date: Sep 6, 2011
Strict Limitation Period Enforced Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act: No Power to Condon Delays Introduction In the case of Seth Banshidhar Kedia Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State Bank Of India &...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert