Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Doctrine of Equal Pay and Compensation Adequacy: Insights from Gopal Chawala v. State of M.P

Doctrine of Equal Pay and Compensation Adequacy: Insights from Gopal Chawala v. State of M.P

Date: Dec 14, 2011
Doctrine of Equal Pay and Compensation Adequacy: Insights from Gopal Chawala v. State of M.P Introduction The case of Gopal Chawala and Others v. State Of Madhya Pradesh and Others addresses the...
Setback of Section 307 IPC in Achhelal Choudhary & Others v. State of M.P.: A Landmark Judgment

Setback of Section 307 IPC in Achhelal Choudhary & Others v. State of M.P.: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Dec 8, 2011
Setback of Section 307 IPC in Achhelal Choudhary & Others v. State of M.P.: A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Achhelal Choudhary & 3 Others v. State of M.P. adjudicated by the Madhya...
Recognition of Home Guards as Regular Establishment: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Decision

Recognition of Home Guards as Regular Establishment: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Decision

Date: Dec 3, 2011
Recognition of Home Guards as Regular Establishment: Madhya Pradesh High Court's Landmark Decision Introduction The case of Home Guard Sainik Evam Parivar Kalyan Sangh And Others v. State Of Madhya...
MP High Court Upholds Superannuation Age of 62 for School Teachers in Ku. Sikander Shabana v. State of Madhya Pradesh

MP High Court Upholds Superannuation Age of 62 for School Teachers in Ku. Sikander Shabana v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Dec 2, 2011
MP High Court Upholds Superannuation Age of 62 for School Teachers in Ku. Sikander Shabana v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Introduction The case of Ku. Sikander Shabana v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh...
Affirming Ad Valorem Court Fees for Claimant Appeals: Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P

Affirming Ad Valorem Court Fees for Claimant Appeals: Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P

Date: Nov 19, 2011
Affirming Ad Valorem Court Fees for Claimant Appeals: Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P Introduction The case of Ashok Kumar v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on...
Due Process in Lease Cancellation: Sajni v. Indore Development Authority

Due Process in Lease Cancellation: Sajni v. Indore Development Authority

Date: Nov 9, 2011
Due Process in Lease Cancellation: Sajni v. Indore Development Authority Introduction The case of Sajni v. Indore Development Authority adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on November 8,...
Mandate on Retirement Age in Grant-in-Aid Technical Institutions: Y.P Singh v. State of M.P.

Mandate on Retirement Age in Grant-in-Aid Technical Institutions: Y.P Singh v. State of M.P.

Date: Oct 22, 2011
Mandate on Retirement Age in Grant-in-Aid Technical Institutions: Y.P Singh v. State of M.P. Introduction The case of Y.P Singh (Prof.) v. State Of M.P And Others was adjudicated by the Madhya...
Establishing Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Dinesh v. Shantibai

Establishing Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Dinesh v. Shantibai

Date: Oct 21, 2011
Establishing Grounds for Divorce: Insights from Dinesh v. Shantibai Introduction Dinesh v. Shantibai is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on October 20, 2011. This case...
Settlement Enforcement Under SARFAESI Act: Insights from Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India

Settlement Enforcement Under SARFAESI Act: Insights from Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India

Date: Oct 21, 2011
Settlement Enforcement Under SARFAESI Act: Insights from Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India Introduction The case of Gaurav Enterprises v. State Bank of India And Others adjudicated by the...
MP High Court Establishes Retirement Age of 60 for Daily Wager Employees

MP High Court Establishes Retirement Age of 60 for Daily Wager Employees

Date: Sep 8, 2011
MP High Court Establishes Retirement Age of 60 for Daily Wager Employees Introduction The case of Badri v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on September 7, 2011,...
Strict Limitation Period Enforced Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act: No Power to Condon Delays

Strict Limitation Period Enforced Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act: No Power to Condon Delays

Date: Sep 6, 2011
Strict Limitation Period Enforced Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act: No Power to Condon Delays Introduction In the case of Seth Banshidhar Kedia Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State Bank Of India &...
Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation: Clarifying Sanction Requirements in Corruption Prosecutions

Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation: Clarifying Sanction Requirements in Corruption Prosecutions

Date: Aug 30, 2011
Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation: Clarifying Sanction Requirements in Corruption Prosecutions Introduction The case of Ajoy Acharya v. State Bureau Of Investigation, adjudicated by the...
Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors: Court Fees in Joint Writ Petitions

Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors: Court Fees in Joint Writ Petitions

Date: Jul 28, 2011
Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors: Court Fees in Joint Writ Petitions Introduction The case of Rakesh Gautam & Ors v. State Of M.P Ors, adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on July 27,...
Substantial Compliance and Judicial Restraint in Public Tender Procedures: Insights from Tejas Construction v. Municipal Council

Substantial Compliance and Judicial Restraint in Public Tender Procedures: Insights from Tejas Construction v. Municipal Council

Date: May 21, 2011
Substantial Compliance and Judicial Restraint in Public Tender Procedures: Insights from Tejas Construction v. Municipal Council Introduction The case of Tejas Construction And Infrastructure Pvt....
State Rule-Making Powers in Motor Vehicles Regulation: Shaheed Khan v. State Of M.P and Others

State Rule-Making Powers in Motor Vehicles Regulation: Shaheed Khan v. State Of M.P and Others

Date: May 19, 2011
State Rule-Making Powers in Motor Vehicles Regulation: Shaheed Khan v. State Of M.P and Others Introduction The case of Shaheed Khan And Others v. State Of M.P And Others was adjudicated by the...
Judicial Oversight and the Necessity of Reasoned Decisions in Detention Under NSA: Commentary on 'State Of M.P And Another v. Union Of India And Another'

Judicial Oversight and the Necessity of Reasoned Decisions in Detention Under NSA: Commentary on 'State Of M.P And Another v. Union Of India And Another'

Date: May 12, 2011
Judicial Oversight and the Necessity of Reasoned Decisions in Detention Under NSA: Commentary on State Of M.P And Another v. Union Of India And Another Introduction The case of State Of M.P And...
Eligibility Criteria for Pension Under MP Pension Rules: Insights from Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others

Eligibility Criteria for Pension Under MP Pension Rules: Insights from Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others

Date: Apr 20, 2011
Eligibility Criteria for Pension Under MP Pension Rules: Insights from Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others Introduction The case of Mamta Shukla v. State Of M.P And Others adjudicated by the...
Eligibility Criteria for Family Pension: Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Others

Eligibility Criteria for Family Pension: Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Others

Date: Apr 20, 2011
Eligibility Criteria for Family Pension: Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Others Introduction The case of Dukhuram v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others was adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Mandatory Compliance with Section 23-B of M.P Accommodation Control Act: A Landmark Judgment

Mandatory Compliance with Section 23-B of M.P Accommodation Control Act: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Feb 25, 2011
Mandatory Compliance with Section 23-B of M.P Accommodation Control Act: A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Tilakraj Sharma v. Shyamabai Tiwari before the Madhya Pradesh High Court,...
Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Judgment: Investment Utilization under Section 32AB of the IT Act

Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Judgment: Investment Utilization under Section 32AB of the IT Act

Date: Feb 23, 2011
Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Judgment: Investment Utilization under Section 32AB of the IT Act Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. adjudicated by the Madhya...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert