...apply to the facts of this case and the SLP is perfectly maintainable, even though the petitioner had not challenged the original order passed by the High Court on 5.11.2008 Learned counsel submitted...inclined to dismiss this special leave petition. We find force in the contention made by the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent that this SLP is not maintainable, since the main order was not challenged but only the order passed in the review petition alone was challenged in this SLP. Hence, the SLP is, therefore, not maintainable and the same is dismissed....LPA No. 1233 of 2006. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent raised a preliminary objection that the special leave petition is not maintainable since the main judgment...

...(2004) 13 SCC 675 may be looked at) that a special leave petition is not maintainable against an order in a review petition. These authorities have not been shown or considered by this Court whilst passing the above orders. Once SLP is...not maintainable no orders can/should be passed thereon except to dismiss the same. In view of the settled position, the...abovementioned orders cannot be considered to be precedent.5. As the special leave petitions are not maintainable, leave to file a special leave petition is refused. SLPs will...

...not maintainable against an order in a review petition. These authorities have not been shown or considered by this Court whilst passing the above orders. Once SLP is not maintainable no orders can...675 and M.N Haider (2004) 13 SCC 677, we dismiss this appeal as not maintainable. Ordered accordingly.CA No. … of 2013 arising out of SLP (C...Respondent 8 that the civil appeals by way of special leave petition were not maintainable. According to the learned counsel for Respondent 8, the appeal against the order dated 29-1-2000 of the High...

...basis of the consent of the parties, which was recorded in the minutes of the order duly signed by the Senior Counsel for the parties . The Review Petition was, therefore, not maintainable. The notice on the SLP stated...that the matter might be disposed of at the SLP stage itself. The notice has been served, but the respondents have not put in an appearance...first clause of the "minutes of order" was not correct in that the judgments mentioned therein were inapplicable to the facts of their case. Accordingly, the appellants filed a Review Petition. Upon...

...undertaking in the High Court, no doubt on that very day. Even so, it was an incorrect statement. Secondly — and more important — his SLP is not maintainable in view of the undertaking furnished by him in...undertaking to abide by the order granted by the High Court, has no doubt, made the said undertaking subject to any order of the Supreme Court. This rider was not provided in the order of the High...October 10, 1984. In the special leave petition, a positive statement was made that “the petitioner has not filed any undertaking as the petitioner is aggrieved with the judgment of the High Court...

...matter of SLP (Civil) No. 24739/2012 which was dismissed on 31.8.2012, so this writ appeal is not maintainable. Though Shri Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for appellants submits that in view of the...had declined to interfere with the order passed by the writ Court, we 12.8.2013 also find that this appeal after dismissal of the aforesaid SLP is not maintainable. The appellants herein ought to have obtained a specific permission from the Apex Court for filing this writ appeal for challenging the order dated 23.4.2012 in W.P No. 6296/2010, which was subject matter of the SLP.In view of aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable, with no order as to costs....I.A No. 10401/2013 for dismissal of the writ appeal as not maintainable.This application is filed by the respondent No. 1 on the ground that the appellants have challenged...

...the order dated 12-7-2013 SLP (C) No. 22035 of 2013 by this Hon'ble Court.(iii) Present SLP is not maintainable as per the settled law laid down by this Hon'ble Court, namely, that an SLP is...not maintainable against the dismissal of review filed before the High Court after dismissal of SLP.(iv) In any case the SLP is also not...event, this Court holds that SLP is only against the judgment of review and is not maintainable, it would tantamount to amending Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The learned Senior...

...before the Division Bench which was dismissed on the ground that it was not maintainable.4. Learned counsel for the respondent initially took objection that no SLP had...SLP against the order of learned Single Judge inasmuch as the Division Bench had accepted the contention of the respondent that the appeal was not maintainable.5. So far...been preferred against the order of the Division Bench. We are of the view that even though the State had not preferred an SLP against the order of the Division Bench, it is not precluded from filing an...

...of by the Division Bench and the petitioner has not preferred any SLP, a fresh separate writ petition is not maintainable before the Single Bench.6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable....WPS No. 788/2015, which was disposed of on 19.03.2015 by observing thus:-“In view of the interim order dated 27.02.2015 passed by the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 3449 of 2015 arising from Writ...Petition (S) No. 6759 of 2014, we are not inclined to keep this writ petition pending and dispose it with the observation that the final orders passed by the Supreme Court would also govern the case of...

... (Crl.) No.5615/2023 was filed, which was dismissed as withdrawn as not pressed. Thereafter again SLP was filed, which was dismissed as not maintainable. In both the orders no liberty has been granted to the applicant to file repeat application before the trial Court as well as before High Court. Therefore, after dismissal of the SLP, this...the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 294, 302, 323, 326 of IPC and Section 25(1-B)(B), 27 of Arms Act. 2. First application was dismissed on merit by this Court. Thereafter the SLP...

...availability of remedy under Section 397 CrPC would make a petition under Section 482 CrPC not maintainable.2. While considering all these matters at the SLP stage, on 5-7-2013...appellants under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for brevity “CrPC”). The High Court held the petitions to be not maintainable in view of the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in...370)“6. … Only because a revision petition is maintainable, the same by itself … would not constitute a bar for entertaining an application under Section 482 of the Code...

...of the order duly signed by the senior counsel for the parties”. The review petition was, therefore, not maintainable.4. The notice on the SLP stated that the matter might...be disposed of at the SLP stage itself. The notice has been served, but the respondents have not put in an appearance.5. The basis upon which the review petition was...not correct in that the judgments mentioned therein were inapplicable to the facts of their case. Accordingly, the appellants filed a review petition. Upon the review petition the order under...

...maintainable, since the main order was not challenged but only the order passed in the review petition alone was challenged in this SLP. Hence, the SLP is, therefore, not maintainable and the same is dismissed...1372 : (1964) 5 SCR 174] is not correct. Consequently, the appeal, being not maintainable, stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.”15. The rationale for not entertaining a special leave petition challenging the order of High Court rejecting the review petition when main order in the writ petition is not challenged can be easily comprehended. Against the main judgment the SLP having...06.02.2020 has not dismissed the review petition as not maintainable. The High Court proceeded to meticulously examine the question and after consideration came to the conclusion that there is no mistake...

...explanation in the contempt petition before the same court and not here. With the said observation, the SLP is dismissed. Therefore, this Review Application is not maintainable in...

...High Court has also erred in awarding compensation in Civil Appeal No. 4552 of 2005 [@ SLP (C) No. 9788 of 1998]. The subsequent suit or writ petition would not be maintainable in view of the...occurred not because of their fault but due to the act of God.5. In Civil Appeal No. 4560 of 2005 [@ SLP (C) No. 5591 of 1999] arising from OJC No. 4247 of 1997, the...petitioners even though the appellants — who were the respondent in the writ petition — had denied the liability on the ground that the deaths had not occurred as a result of their negligence but because of the...

...passing the Order dated 12.07.2013 by this Hon’ble Court. (iii) Present SLP is not maintainable as per the settled law laid down by this Hon’ble Court namely that an SLP is...not maintainable against the dismissal of review filed before the HC after dismissal of SLP. (iv) In any case the SLP is also not...Sarma (supra), the impugned judgment had not been challenged. Therefore, this Court said that no SLP would be maintainable only against the judgment of the High Court rendered in a review petition...

...25.3, we are inclined to dismiss this special leave petition. We find force in the contention made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent that this SLP is not maintainable, since the main order was not challenged but only the order passed in the review petition alone was challenged in this SLP. Hence..., the SLP is, therefore, not maintainable and the same is dismissed..., (1964) 5 SCR 174 is not correct. Consequently, the appeal, being not maintainable, stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.”17. The rationale for not entertaining a special leave petition challenging the order of the High Court rejecting the review petition when main order in the writ petition is not challenged can be easily comprehended. Against the main judgment SLP having...

...DDA, overruling the decision in Pune Municipal Corporation (supra). Accordingly, it was submitted that the SLP not being maintainable deserved outright dismissal. e...not met. f) Group C.3 involves cases where during pendency of the SLP in the first round, the appellants approached this Court with a fresh SLP owing to a change in law.... While in some cases both the SLPs (now Civil Appeals) are pending before us in the present batch, in some cases, the other SLP is pending separately and is not part of the present batch. There are...

...subsequent to Kunhayammed (supra) and “opined in passing” that a review petition subsequent to dismissal of SLP is not maintainable but are of two Judges Benches and again turn on their own facts; (viii...& Anr…. S 2016 (154) DRJ 698 though on the basis of K. Rajamouli and Meghmala (supra) holding review to be not maintainable after dismissal of SLP but is per incuriam Gangadhara and Sri Ram Builders...review petition of the review petitioners would also suffer the same fate. However it would not make the review not maintainable.21. We next take up Bakshi Dev Raj (supra). Incidentally in that case also, the SLP was...

...petition is not maintainable as the petitioner had not moved the High Court before the Division Bench against the judgment and order of the Single Bench. He may, therefore, be permitted to withdraw this special leave petition. In view of his request, the special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn....OrderSLPs (C) . . . CC Nos. 7465-70, 8287-91, 8403-07, 8464-68, 19503 of 2012, SLP (C) No. 34866 of 2012, CC No. 9200 of 2013, SLP (C) No. 14952 of..., that is not the situation as the special leave petitions have been filed by the petitioner State of Rajasthan against the same impugned order, which was the subject-matter of challenge in the earlier...