...the stone thrown by the family members of Manoj Gupta hit him and injury was caused. He has not caused any injury. Furthermore, he also submits that the so-called brick is not a dangerous weapon.... Hence, this case also does not fall in the 1 definition of Clause 118(2) of BNS, 2023. Hence, prayed that the...the nature of injuries, it is directed that upon arrest by the Police Officer/Investigating officer, he shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bail bond of Rs.50,000/-(Rs. Fifty Thousand...

...Section 325 I.P.C. Brick is not a dangerous weapon and simple hurt was only caused by the accused. Unfortunately the hit by brick throw on the abdomen had caused the dea..., and such hurt is said to be a grievous hurt punishable under Section 324 I.P.C. Grievous hurt caused by weapons which are not dangerous as defined above is an offence punishable under ...brick stone used by the appellant was a weapon from which a knowledge could be attributed to him that the hit by such stone would cause death. The fact that the appellant and the deceased were...

...means of a piece of brick. Injury of Bhagwat Singh has been opined grievous by P.W 6, but weapon used is not dangerous. So, this offence comes under category of section 325 of the...that accused persons were beating him. Accused persons came at the door, informant's father enquired them as why they were beating informant's nephew. He was assaulted by a piece of brick. His head...of brick on his head and his uncle was assaulted by knife thrice below and above knee and at Panjra (a part of body). Bhagwat Singh grand father is said dead.4. P.W 5 is another injured...

.... Coming to the act of other assailants i.e. A1, A2, A4 and A5, they allegedly armed with brick bats which are not dangerous weapons, but they did not cause any injury with brick bat on the body of Addasar...beat her with a brick bat on her left thigh and this is supported by the evidence of Dr. P. Prakasa Rao (P.W.12) and wound certificate (Ex.P14). Therefore, A3 is liable for punishment for the offence punishable under Section 323 of ...there is no evidence about size and weight of brick bat to construe the same as dangerous weapon. Hence, A3 is...

...opined grievous by PW-6, but weapon used is not dangerous. So, this offence comes under category of Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. Injury of PW-5 is simple in nature caused by knife, so that...father enquired them as why they were beating informant's nephew. He was assaulted by a piece of brick. His head broken, informant came out from his room. He was stabbed by accused Ajay Kumar Pandey.... More specifically, it is said that grand father of PW-4 was assaulted by him by means of a piece of brick on his head and his uncle was assaulted by knife thrice below and above knee and at Panjra...

...according to the prosecution case, the appellant gave only one blow with the mason's wall levelling reaper, which is not a dangerous weapon, that the medical evidence shows that the injury caused by the...weapon used in not a dangerous Weapon for causing the injury on the deceased the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would contend that the weapon of Offence cannot be said to be an ordinary stic...attack a person. Therefore, I agree with the learned Additional Public Prosecutor to treat M.O. 1 as a dangerous weapon and by the user of this weapon, the appellant has committed the Offence under...

...the death, of Iqbal Singh opened fire aiming at his chest and caused his death. Accused Gurcharan Singh armed with a dangerous weapon namely Takua caused injury on the forehead of PW8 Jagjit Singh, Accused Sadhu Singh son o..., which was a dangerous weapon, caused injury to Namdar Singh on his head. Accused Gamdoor Singh who was also not armed with any weapon caused injury to Namdar Singh and PW8 Jagjit Singh with ...reverse side on the head of Manpreet Singh. Namdar Singh gave a brick bat blow on the neck of Gamdoor Singh. Sadhu Singh son of Namdar Singh gave a spade blow on the right hand wrist of Manpreet...

...weapon or any dangerous instrument with him with premeditation to cause the death of the deceased. The advice given by Velayutham was not music to the ears of the appellant and hence, he had thrown a...the facts, the prosecution has satisfactorily established that the appellant had thrown a half-brick at the deceased, which proved to be fatal. However, we find that the appellant had not carried any...-brick, which proved fatal. On a written complaint (Ex.P1) given by Kalaivani (P.W.1), the daughter-in-law of Velayutham, Gunasekaran (P.W.17), the Inspector of Police, Maharajakadai Police Station...

...dangerous weapon he held. Further, accused Avtar Singh, would have had no knowledge that such a throw of half brick would take away the life of a man. But the Court is not inclined to accept the s...said date, accused Niranjan Singh raised lalkara and accused Avtar Singh picked a half brick from the street and gave blow with force to Lachhman Singh which hit him on the chest and as a result of...the death of Lachhman Singh could be attributed to Avtar Singh who simply collected, as per case of the prosecution, a half brick from the street and attacked Lachhman Singh who was standing at a...

...the injury that was sustained by Vasanta on his head might have been caused by getting hit on head by a brick. The brick, when used as a weapon of offence can be dangerous for life of a p...was grievous in nature, it was a fracture of parietal bone on his head and it was caused, by a dangerous weapon by the present appellant and, therefore, there is no ground made out for making any...and others, reported in 1981 CRI.L.J. 1157, in which Division Bench of Karnataka High Court had in a similar situation, found that the weapon could not be connected to...

...not of an attempt to cause grievous hurt with a dangerous weapon of shooting. 6. It is for this reason that I have been utterly unable to understand the judgment of the Magistrate and...convicted the applicant in his judgment stated as follows : "The evidence showed that there was a communal riot in the city of Pilibhit in different parts of it. The accused threw brick-bats at the...said parsons and that it wag a matter of pure luck that nobody was injured. The learned Sessions Judge who heard the appeal does not clearly say what he found on examination of the evidence. He...

...onwards when they had decided not to join the work until their wages were paid. The factory gates were closed and a big crowd of labourers collected outside. They became violent. They shouted very abusive...and obnoxious slogans and were saying that they would not leave the owner of the factory alive that day. They showered brick-bats at the factory premises. His office air-conditioner was broken so was...scale down the wall. In such a situation the appellant was not expected to act like a coward and run from the place, but he had a right to defend his property and person. In any view of the matter...

...the neck, and inasmuch as stone (brick) is a dangerous weapon, the trial Court could at least converted the offence under Section 326 IPC. The fact remains that vertebrae was injured at the cervical...did not convict the accused under Section 302 IPC but convicted A1 under Section 325 IPC. This conviction under Section 325 IPC, in my opinion, is very lenient. Since A1 hit the deceased with a brick on...deceased also scolded A.2. On 4.10.1993 at about 10.00 a.m. A.1 came along with A.2 and picked up a quarrel with the deceased Raju referring the previous occurrence; A1 picked up a brick which was...

...that a grievous hurt was caused. It is not that in every case a stone would constitute a dangerous weapon. It would depend upon the facts of the case. At this juncture, it would be relevant to not...facts involved in a particular case, depending upon various factors like size, sharpness, would throw light on the question whether the weapon was a dangerous or deadly weapon or not. That would...constitute a grievous injury. In addition, weapon allegedly used cannot be termed as a dangerous weapon to attract Section 326 IPC. In any event, it was submitted that the appellant has suffered imprisonme...

...accused u/s. 324 I.P.C. is not sustainable as the prosecution has failed to prove that the weapon used by the accused was a dangerous weapon set out in Section 324 I.P.C. The...weapon to satisfy the mind of the court that it was a dangerous weapon. In view of the non-production of the weapon a reasonable presumption may be drawn that it was not a ...not a dangerous weapon the prosecution case bas been established. When the prosecution did not prove that the weapon used was a dangerous weapon there was no obligation ...

...: - "the meaning of the words 'dangerous to life' is left entirely to the professional knowledge of a witness. It is not sufficient that he should make a simpl...Section 313 Cr. P. C. The appellant denied the circumstances which were found attendant upon him. According to him, it was a false case. He did not commit any offence nor he knew the injured...personally. He did not cause any injury to him. Since he was running a furniture shop at Sanjauli Chowk and the local police had been usually harassing him on one or the other reason, that was the...

.... In para 2 of the communication, it was averred:“Your criminal record shows that, you are a dangerous person of violent character and also a weapon-wielding desperado...authority that the detenu was a “dangerous person” within the meaning of Section 2(b-1) was vitiated cannot be accepted. In our view the detention order under challenge does not suffer from any infirmity....Brihan, Mumbai.You and your like-minded associates always move in the above areas armed with dangerous weapons like revolver and chopper and do not...

...evidence of the so-called eyewitnesses was tainted. Additionally, the knife supposed to have been used was not recovered. In any event it was not established that the weapon that was used was a dangerous...therefore there is no scope for interference. The plea that the weapon used was not a dangerous weapon had never been urged before the trial court or the High Court. Whether weapon is a ...caused by means of an instrument referred to in this section.13. The section prescribes a severer punishment where an offender voluntarily causes hurt by dangerous weapon or...

...the weapon of the assault led to further investigation. PW 9 is a shopkeeper who sold the said weapon to Appellant 3 on the date of incident. This was followed by another purchase by Appellant 4 from...’) does not prescribe any particular age as a determinative factor to treat a witness to be a competent one. On the contrary, Section 118 of the Evidence Act envisages that all persons shall be competent to.... This position was concisely stated by Brewer, J. in Wheeler v. United States 159 US 523 (1895). The evidence of a child witness is not required to be rejected per se...

...injury but caused by a sword which is a dangerous weapon.7. In view of the aforesaid discussion, it will not be proper to hold the appellant guilty of causing grievous hurt...his evidence PW 2, the doctor has declared Injury 1 and Injury 7, caused by a blunt weapon, to be grievous by describing them as dangerous to life. But in cross-examination he has opined that...to the complainant and hence for having voluntarily caused hurt by a dangerous weapon, he deserves to be convicted only for the offence under Section 324 IPC which is punishable with imprisonment...