Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court10567
+ Delhi High Court2705
+ Gujarat High Court2501
+ Madras High Court2338
+ Allahabad High Court2162
+ Supreme Court Of India1798
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1788
+ Patna High Court1623
+ Karnataka High Court1455
+ Kerala High Court1330
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1296
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1274
+ Rajasthan High Court1255
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1218
+ Calcutta High Court1073
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1042
+ SEBI1018
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court988
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court919
+ Gauhati High Court882
+ National Green Tribunal838
+ Central Administrative Tribunal828
+ Chhattisgarh High Court640
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission609
+ Orissa High Court591
+ Telangana High Court543
+ Jharkhand High Court488
+ Uttarakhand High Court393
+ CESTAT350
+ Tripura High Court233
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court230
+ Central Information Commission176
+ Sikkim High Court120
+ Armed Forces Tribunal92
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal57
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal45
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board44
+ Privy Council40
+ Meghalaya High Court37
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal32
+ Manipur High Court29
+ National Company Law Tribunal27
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange18
+ Competition Commission Of India18
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity16
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act15
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST14
+ Company Law Board11
+ District Court11
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal10
+ Authority For Advance Rulings4
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST3
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission3
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal3
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property2
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission2
+ Railway Claims Tribunal2
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India1
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs1
+ Commissioner (Appeals)1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority1
+ RERA1
+ Settlement Commission1
+ Trade Marks Registry1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards15712
From 2011 To 202016987
From 2001 To 20105093
From 1991 To 20001917
From 1981 To 1990972
From 1971 To 1980560
From 1961 To 1970537
From 1951 To 1960385
Before 1950227

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, it is required that the quantity of blood to be collected shall not be less than 5 c.c But the definite report of th...386. The point involved in this case is as to whether the amount of blood sent to the Public Analyst was below the minimum prescribed by the Rules. It is true that under Rule 4 of the Bombay...show that the Public Analyst wanted more, even a lesser quantity than specified was a sufficient compliance of the Rules and would not vitiate the conviction. For these reasons, therefore, we find no merit in the appeal which is dis...

...containing blood of the accused to the Chemical Analyser at Junagadh, he drew pointed attention to one breach said to have been committed in respect of Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical ...to the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, hereinafter to be referred to as "the Rules" and find out...percentage of alcohol and such other particulars. Rules 4 and 5 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules,...

...1. The appellant who has been convicted for the offence of being found drunk under Section 66(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act has challenged the order of conviction and sentence passe...but it does not throw any light on the question as to what formalities were observed by the doctor and as regards the steps taken by him. Rule 4(1) of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical ...enjoins as under: (1) The registered medical practitioner shall use a syringe for the collection of the blood of the person produced...

...submitted in the manner prescribed by rules framed under the Bombay Prohibition Act, and therefore it could not be regarded as “duly submitted”. The Government of Bombay has, by notification dated April 1,...produced before a registered medical practitioner for examination and for collection of blood. Undoubtedly, Section 129-A(1) confers power upon a Police or a Prohibition Officer in the conditions set out...(authorised by general or special order by the State Government in this behalf) for the purpose of such medical examination or collection of blood and request such registered medical practitioner or...

...the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, was not complied with, and therefore the Chemical Analyser's report was not proper, ...66(1)(b) of the Act was not proved. Rules called 'The Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules 1959, provide for ...collection and forwarding of blood and the certificate of the test of sample blood. sub-rule (2) of Rule 4 is in these terms: The sample blood collected...

...is said to have collected and forwarded the blood of the accused, has not complied with Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) ...Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(3) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. It was alleged that on August 17, 1987 at about 6.30 p.m the accused was found in the compound of the Police Station in Jambusar in...drunken condition and was abusing. The accused was, therefore, arrested and was then sent for medical examination, after preparing necessary Panchnama. The Medical Officer, having collected sample, sealed...

...reasons for acquittal given by the trial court.6. Now this appeal can be disposed of shortly on the ground that the Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination ...respondent-accused who came to be tried for the offence punishable under Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(3) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, was at the end of the trial...preservative in the blood. The phial shall be labelled and its cap sealed by means of sealing wax with the official seal or the monogram of the registered medical practitioner.(2) The sample...

...also referred to and relied upon the provision as contained in Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959...non-compliance of Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959. It appears that the learned First Appellate Court ...Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 is not recorded by the learned First Appellate Court. 12. Under the circumstances, the view taken ...

...offence punishable under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. According to Shri Patankar, the Medical Officer concerned had sent the phial in which the blood was collected in c...provisions of Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, in Narayan Krishnaji Marulkar v. State of Maha...under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 and particularly sub-rule (2) of R. ...

...is recorded is non - compliance of the requirements prescribed under rule 4 of the bombay prohibition (medical examination and blood test) rules, 1959 ('the ...morning. (3) Therefore, blood sample was collected from the accused and was sent for medical examination. The public analyst certified that blood cotained alcohol. On completion of...respondent - original accused who was working as police inspector at the relevant time was charged for offences punishable under secs. 66 (l) (b) and 85 (1) (3) of the "bombay - prohibition, act, 1949...

...Prohibition (Medical Examination And Blood Test)Rules 1959 [herein after referred to as the 'Prohibition Rules' for brevity]. The doctor has deposed that the phial wa...the accused of the charge of committing offence under section 85(1)(3) and 66(1)(B) of Bombay Prohibition Act. Short facts leading to filing of this appeal deserves to be set out...) and 66(1)(B) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (herein after referred to as the 'Prohibition Act' for brevity). The Head Constable Jayantilal Vrajlal Khatri, i.e. the accused on 27/1/1995 was found in...

...provision of Rule of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination And Blood Test) Rules 1959 [herein after referred to as the ‘Prohibition ...), Gandhinagar in Criminal Case No. 1624 of 1995 acquitting of the accused of the charge of committing offence under section 85(1)(3) and 66(1)(B) of Bombay Prohibition Act.3. Short facts leading...offence punishable under section 85(1)(3) and 66(1)(B) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (herein after referred to as the ‘Prohibition Act’ for brevity). The Head Constable...

...launched against the accused under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.3. The teamed trial Court held that there was non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of ...Prohibition Act.4. The learned Counsel for the State has urged before me that rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test...Bombay Prohibition Act. According to the prosecution, the respondent-accused went to the Dipali Lodge at, about 6 p.m on 4-9-1984 and rented cot therein entering, his name himself in the Lodge...

...and sentence imposed on the accused under section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. It is against this conviction and sentence that the accused has filed this revision application...., Aurangabad, partly allowing the petitioners' appeal and setting aside the conviction and sentence under section 85(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, and confirming the convicti...and sentence of the petitioner under section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad.2. It is the...

...accused, has not complied with Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 (‘the said Rules of 1959‘, for short). Referring to the ...in Criminal Case No. 888/1996 whereby the accused-respondent hereinabove has been acquitted of the charge of committing offences punishable under Section 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(3) of the Bombay Prohibition...village in a drunken condition. The accused was, therefore, arrested and sent for medical examination after preparing necessary panchnama. The Medical Officer, having collected sample, sealed the phial...

...mandatory requirement under the Bombay Prohibition Act and the Rules with regard to medical examination and blood test Rules have bee...under Sections 85(1)(3) and 66(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced to suffer 3 months R.I and also imposed fine of Rs. 500/-, in default, further S.I for one...samples. In the opinion of this Court, the blood samples were collected and seal was applied duly complying with the mandatory provisions of the Act and the Rules and there is nothing on record which...

...that the procedure prescribed by rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical) Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, (hereinafter referred to as 'the ...offences punishable under Section 85 (1) (3) and 66 (1) (b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), before the learned Judicial Magistrate. First...4 in terms interalia, enjoins on the registered medical practitioner, who collects blood for the purpose of examination, to steriliese the syringe by putting it in boiling water before he uses...

...a specific mandate contained in rule 4 of the bombay prohibition medical examination and blood test rules 1959 (the rules) that the cap of the phial in which the ...- accused against the order of the learned magistrate convicting him for the offence under sec. 66 (j) (b) of the bombay prohibition act (the act) and sentencing him to r...mr. Patel and in his opinion the accused had consumed liquor though he was not under the influence of the same at the relevant time. The medical officer then collected blood in a phial from the person...

...under s. 129-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, in cases in which there has been a breach of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and ...facts stated in such certificate without examining the medical officer who had collected the blood and even without examining the Chemical Examiner who had examined that blood.5. The manner in which ...examination under sub-s. (1) of s. 129-A of the Act, collected 3 c.c of his blood instead of 5 c.c as required by r. 4 of the rules referred to above. In the other case, Criminal Revision Application No. 749...

...breach of procedure prescribed under Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rule"), which has to be fo...and has also produced Form A and B prescribed as per the Prohibition Act and Rules. While going through the oral as well as ...Magistrate has not committed any error in holding that the Rules of Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 are duly com...