Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court3993
+ Gujarat High Court1197
+ SEBI916
+ Supreme Court Of India781
+ Delhi High Court706
+ Madras High Court580
+ National Green Tribunal579
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal479
+ Karnataka High Court394
+ Allahabad High Court368
+ Kerala High Court366
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court331
+ Patna High Court298
+ Gauhati High Court253
+ Calcutta High Court238
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court229
+ Rajasthan High Court186
+ CESTAT182
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission160
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court157
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court141
+ Central Administrative Tribunal103
+ Telangana High Court103
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission89
+ Central Information Commission83
+ Orissa High Court81
+ Chhattisgarh High Court70
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission61
+ Uttarakhand High Court58
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal48
+ Jharkhand High Court45
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal43
+ Tripura High Court42
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court38
+ Sikkim High Court31
+ National Company Law Tribunal25
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board20
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange18
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal17
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity11
+ Competition Commission Of India11
+ Privy Council10
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal8
+ Company Law Board7
+ Armed Forces Tribunal6
+ Manipur High Court6
+ District Court5
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act3
+ Meghalaya High Court3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings2
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission2
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India1
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST1
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards5241
From 2011 To 20204203
From 2001 To 20101490
From 1991 To 2000497
From 1981 To 1990316
From 1971 To 1980260
From 1961 To 1970269
From 1951 To 1960223
Before 1950146

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, it is required that the quantity of blood to be collected shall not be less than 5 c.c But the definite report of the Public ...386. The point involved in this case is as to whether the amount of blood sent to the Public Analyst was below the minimum prescribed by the Rules. It is true that under Rule 4 of the Bombay...show that the Public Analyst wanted more, even a lesser quantity than specified was a sufficient compliance of the Rules and would not vitiate the conviction. For these reasons, therefore, we find no merit in the appeal which is dis...

...submitted in the manner prescribed by rules framed under the Bombay Prohibition Act, and therefore it could not be regarded as “duly submitted”. The Government of Bombay has, by notification dated April 1,...produced before a registered medical practitioner for examination and for collection of blood. Undoubtedly, Section 129-A(1) confers power upon a Police or a Prohibition Officer in the conditions set out...duly submitted to him for examination or analysis and report. Section 129-B deals with a special class of reports and certificates. In the investigation of an offence under the Bombay Prohibition Act...

...containing blood of the accused to the Chemical Analyser at Junagadh, he drew pointed attention to one breach said to have been committed in respect of Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical ...to the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, hereinafter to be referred to as "the Rules" and find out as to wh...percentage of alcohol and such other particulars. Rules 4 and 5 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959,...

...1. The appellant who has been convicted for the offence of being found drunk under Section 66(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act has challenged the order of conviction and sentence passe...but it does not throw any light on the question as to what formalities were observed by the doctor and as regards the steps taken by him. Rule 4(1) of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination ...5 c.c. of venous Wood in the syringe from the body of the person. The blood collected in the syringe shall then be transferred into a phial containing anticoagulant and preservative and the phial...

...the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, was not complied with, and therefore the Chemical Analyser's report was not proper, and...66(1)(b) of the Act was not proved. Rules called 'The Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules 1959, provide for medical ...collection and forwarding of blood and the certificate of the test of sample blood. sub-rule (2) of Rule 4 is in these terms: The sample blood collected...

...is said to have collected and forwarded the blood of the accused, has not complied with Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959...Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(3) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. It was alleged that on August 17, 1987 at about 6.30 p.m the accused was found in the compound of the Police Station in Jambusar in...petitioner to be guilty for the offence. punishable under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act is and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and...

...mandatory requirement under the Bombay Prohibition Act and the Rules with regard to medical examination and blood test Rules have been complet...under Sections 85(1)(3) and 66(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced to suffer 3 months R.I and also imposed fine of Rs. 500/-, in default, further S.I for one...samples. In the opinion of this Court, the blood samples were collected and seal was applied duly complying with the mandatory provisions of the Act and the Rules and there is nothing on record which...

...offence punishable under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. According to Shri Patankar, the Medical Officer concerned had sent the phial in which the blood was collected in contravent...provisions of Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, in Narayan Krishnaji Marulkar v. State of Maharashtra...under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 and particularly sub-rule (2) of R. 4, which ...

...also referred to and relied upon the provision as contained in Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 ...non-compliance of Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959. It appears that the learned First Appellate Court while dea...Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 is not recorded by the learned First Appellate Court. 12. Under the circumstances, the view taken by the le...

...reasons for acquittal given by the trial court.6. Now this appeal can be disposed of shortly on the ground that the Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and ...respondent-accused who came to be tried for the offence punishable under Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(3) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, was at the end of the trial...Bhogilal Chunilal Pandya, P.W 2, who examined him on the very day at 23.00 hours and took his sample of the blood in the manner as provided by Rule 4(1) of the said Rules...

...is recorded is non - compliance of the requirements prescribed under rule 4 of the bombay prohibition (medical examination and blood test) rules, 1959 ('the ...respondent - original accused who was working as police inspector at the relevant time was charged for offences punishable under secs. 66 (l) (b) and 85 (1) (3) of the "bombay - prohibition, act, 1949...morning. (3) Therefore, blood sample was collected from the accused and was sent for medical examination. The public analyst certified that blood cotained alcohol. On completion of...

...launched against the accused under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.3. The teamed trial Court held that there was non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of ...Prohibition Act.4. The learned Counsel for the State has urged before me that rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) ...Bombay Prohibition Act. According to the prosecution, the respondent-accused went to the Dipali Lodge at, about 6 p.m on 4-9-1984 and rented cot therein entering, his name himself in the Lodge...

...and sentence imposed on the accused under section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. It is against this conviction and sentence that the accused has filed this revision application...., Aurangabad, partly allowing the petitioners' appeal and setting aside the conviction and sentence under section 85(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, and confirming the convicti...and sentence of the petitioner under section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad.2. It is the...

...Prohibition (Medical Examination And Blood Test)Rules 1959 [herein after referred to as the 'Prohibition Rules' for brevity]. The doctor has deposed that the phial was brought...the accused of the charge of committing offence under section 85(1)(3) and 66(1)(B) of Bombay Prohibition Act. Short facts leading to filing of this appeal deserves to be set out...) and 66(1)(B) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (herein after referred to as the 'Prohibition Act' for brevity). The Head Constable Jayantilal Vrajlal Khatri, i.e. the accused on 27/1/1995 was found in...

...provision of Rule of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination And Blood Test) Rules 1959 [herein after referred to as the ‘Prohibition ...), Gandhinagar in Criminal Case No. 1624 of 1995 acquitting of the accused of the charge of committing offence under section 85(1)(3) and 66(1)(B) of Bombay Prohibition Act.3. Short facts leading...offence punishable under section 85(1)(3) and 66(1)(B) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (herein after referred to as the ‘Prohibition Act’ for brevity). The Head Constable...

...accused, has not complied with Rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 (‘the said Rules of 1959‘, for short). Referring to the depositio...in Criminal Case No. 888/1996 whereby the accused-respondent hereinabove has been acquitted of the charge of committing offences punishable under Section 66(1)(b) and 85(1)(3) of the Bombay Prohibition...Rule 4 of the said Rules of 1959 are mandatory. Rule 4 of the said Rules of 1959 provide manner of collection and forwarding of blood. It reads as under...

...under s. 129-A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, in cases in which there has been a breach of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and ...facts stated in such certificate without examining the medical officer who had collected the blood and even without examining the Chemical Examiner who had examined that blood.5. The manner in which ...examination under sub-s. (1) of s. 129-A of the Act, collected 3 c.c of his blood instead of 5 c.c as required by r. 4 of the rules referred to above. In the other case, Criminal Revision Application No. 749...

...a specific mandate contained in rule 4 of the bombay prohibition medical examination and blood test rules 1959 (the rules) that the cap of the phial in which the blood i...- accused against the order of the learned magistrate convicting him for the offence under sec. 66 (j) (b) of the bombay prohibition act (the act) and sentencing him to r...about addition of the same and that he had received the bottle prepared from the laboratory. Rule 4 of the rules inter alia requires that the blood collected in the syringe...

...that the procedure prescribed by rule 4 of the Bombay Prohibition (Medical) Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'), w...offences punishable under Section 85 (1) (3) and 66 (1) (b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), before the learned Judicial Magistrate. First...collected samples of blood and urine of the accused and the same were later sent for analysis to the chemical analyser. On analysis, it was found that the blood contained 0.2047 percent of w/v of...

...Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959 were committed in taking the blood of the accused, the learned Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused inclu...prepared. The appellant and the other accused were thereafter taken to the Amreli hospital where their blood was taken by the Civil Surgeon for the purpose of carrying out the necessary test for...)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. The question arising for determination is a short one, but in order to appreciate it, it is necessary to state the facts giving rise to the appeal...