CiteTEXT
...legislative act.
14. The supreme court had to consider the question whether a notification issued in exercise of a power conferred by an act has force of law, in state of bombay ...inspector, muliyar pancnayat , 1967 k. L. T. 577 and a full bench of this court in executive officer v. V. P. Devassy , 1970 k. L. T. 991 and another division bench of th...kailash nath and another v. State of "on"> "on"> u. P. And others, a. I. R. 1957 s. C. 790. The notification which arose for consideration in this case was one issued under ...
...decisions of the Supreme Court, viz., Chiranjitlal Chowdhury v. The Union of India and Others, and the State ...State of Punjab v. Ajaib Singh and Another the taking into custody by the executive authority under the Abducted Persons (Recovery ...48 of the Revenue Recovery Act.In United State of America v. James M. Ragen and two Others three persons were tried with a jury by a District Court for wilfully attempting to evade or...
...Hindu Women's
Rights to Property Act [[1941] F.C.R. 12]
and adopted by this Court in The State of
Bombay and another...State of Travancore-
Cochin and Ors. v. Bombay Company Ltd.,
Alleppey, (AIR 1952...Sarkar (1952 SCR
284) and State of Bombay and Anr. v. F.N. Balsara (1952 SCR
682). In Anwar Ali's case (supra) at pages 363 and 364 i...
....
The other attack under Art. 19(1)(f) of the Constitution is equally futile in view of the decisions of this Court in ...contemplated by s. 40 in respect of Companies. It has been recognised by this Court in the case of The State of Bombay v Bhanji Munji and Another (1) that providing housing accom...indicated. See in this connection The State of Bombay v. Bhanji Munji and Another (1). In that case the question was whether the ...
.... Union of India and others and The State of Bombay and another V/s. F. N. Balsara and reiterated the principle that presum...decisions are : M/s. Steelworth Limited V/s. State of Assam; Gopal Narain V/s. State of Uttar Pradesh and another; Ganga Sugar Corporation Limited V/s. ...others, R.K. Garg V/s. Union of India and others and State of W.B. and another V/s. E.I.T.A. India Limited and others.
...
...and the two earlier decisions, namely, Charanjit Lal Chowdhury V/s. Union of India and others and The State of...2351 State of M.P. V/s. Rakesh Kohli and another, the principles which have to be borne in mind while...Narain V/s. State of Uttar Pradesh and another; Ganga Sugar Corporation Limited V/s. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, R.K. Garg V/s. Union ...
...Lal Chowdhury V/s. Union of India and others and The State of Bombay and another V/s. F. N. Balsara ...) 7 Supreme Court Cases 241 in the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. (2) and another V/s. State of Haryana and.... Steelworth Limited V/s. State of Assam; Gopal Narain V/s. State of Uttar Pradesh and another; Ganga Sugar Corporation Limited V/s. State ...
...Lal Chowdhury V/s. Union of India and others and The State of Bombay and another V/s. F. N. Balsara ...) 7 Supreme Court Cases 241 in the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. (2) and another V/s. State of Haryana and.... Steelworth Limited V/s. State of Assam; Gopal Narain V/s. State of Uttar Pradesh and another; Ganga Sugar Corporation Limited V/s. State ...
...Lal Chowdhury V/s. Union of India and others and The State of Bombay and another V/s. F. N. Balsara ...) 7 Supreme Court Cases 241 in the case of Jindal Stainless Ltd. (2) and another V/s. State of Haryana and.... Steelworth Limited V/s. State of Assam; Gopal Narain V/s. State of Uttar Pradesh and another; Ganga Sugar Corporation Limited V/s. State ...
...
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAG....
Admit.
Call for record and proceedings. Shri H. D. Dubey, learned Asstt. Government Pleader appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 & 2. In view of...order passed on the Civil Application (f) No.932/2015, the appellant will not be entitled for interest on the amount of enhanced compensation for the period from 6-7-2013 till today.
JUDGE
...
...the Bombay buyer. When the movement of goods from one State to another is an incident of the contract it is a sale in the course of inter-State sale. It does not matter in which ...caused the movement of the goods from Madras to Bombay. The inter-State movement of the goods was a result of the contract of sale and the fact that the contract emanated from corresponde...A.N Ray, C.J— These two appeals by certificate and the writ petitions turn on the question whether the contract for sale of goods was an inter-State sale or an intra-State...
...circumstance relevant for ascertaining the pith and substance of an impugned Act. This Court, in The State of Bombay v. F. N. Ba..., A.I.R. 1947 P.C. 60,. State of Bombay v. F. N. Balsara, [1951] S.C.R. 682...beyond its
153
comprehension:see The State of Bombay v. F. N. Balsara...
...attention to the following case law;
(1). The State of Bombay and Another v. F.N.Balsara (1951...:
(1). In Michigan Rubber ( India) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka and Others (2012 (8) SCC 216), the Apex Court...view of the judgment of the Apex Court in ABL International Ltd. And Another v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. ...
.... v. State of Punjab,3. In that case this Court observed that mere calling upon the worker for collecting dues from the office is not sufficient lender, and was not proper compliance of 25-...Bombay,4 the Supreme Court observed that clauses (a) and (b) of section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act are conditions...National Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. v. The State of West Bengal,6 it was held that the compliance of Section 25(a) was a condition precedent. In...
...Section 25-F (c), Shri. Shelke, relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Bombay Union of Journalists and others v...) Puthiya Veetil Raghavan of Bombay v. M.K. Bhaskaran of Bombay and others, 1987 II CLR 439
(BHC).
(...of the Bombay Industrial Relationship Act, 1946. He has made available copy of the Standing Orders which is marked 'X' for identification and taken on record. The action taken by the bank, is neither...
...that case the petitioner figured as an accused in the prosecution launched against her and another by the respondent for an offence of defamation in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Bombay. This...since the people of Karnataka are vitally interested in the outcome of this litigation, it is essential that the suit should be tried in Karnataka and not in Bombay. It is further alleged that if the...a resident of Bangalore and usually divides his time largely between Delhi and Bangalore he should have no objection to the trial of the suit in the State of Karnataka. On the other hand if the su...
...expressed by the Bombay High Court in Pandurang Hari v. Shanker Maruti(1) and by the Gujarat High Court in Kalicharan Bhaianlal Bhayya v. Bai Mahalaxmi widow of Trikamlal...)
R 1989 SC2240 (12)
ACT:
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 67 of 1948-Proviso to s. 43C-Introduced by Bombay Act 13 of 1956-Whether...protects tenants in suits filed after enactment of Bombay Act 33 of 1952--ss. 70 and 85-jurisdiction of Civil Courts- Scope of-Proviso-If a substantive provision.
HEADNOTE...
Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.
...Balu Shivling Dombe v. Divisional Magistrate, Pandharpur and following a judgment, dated March 17, 1968, ...Gurbachan Singh v. State of Bombay 1952 SCR 737, AIR 1952 SC 221, 1952 SCJ 279 had uphel...Nadkarni, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-IV, Greater Bombay. On a consideration of the explanation and the evidence tendered by the appellant, the Dy. Commissioner passed an order, dated July 23...
...Constitution should be used with caution and circumspection in construing Arts. 19(1) (g) and 301 of the Indian Constitution.
State of Travancore-Cochin v. The Bombay...-words through a weekly newspaper printed and published at Bangalore. This paper had a wide circulation in the State of Bombay, where the respondents set up collection depots to receive entry forms and...the promoters of such competitions for sums collected from the State. Thereupon, on December 18, 1952, the respondents moved the High Court of Bombay under Art. 226 of the Constitution and contend...