Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers&amp Case Commentaries

Palms v. Texas Children’s Hospital:  The Fifth Circuit’s New Rule on Appellate Forfeiture of Post-Accommodation Title VII Religious-Discrimination Claims

Palms v. Texas Children’s Hospital: The Fifth Circuit’s New Rule on Appellate Forfeiture of Post-Accommodation Title VII Religious-Discrimination Claims

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Palms v. Texas Children’s Hospital: The Fifth Circuit’s New Rule on Appellate Forfeiture of Post-Accommodation Title VII Religious-Discrimination Claims 1. Introduction In Palms v. Texas Children’s...
Gardner v. IAM: The Fourth Circuit Adopts a “Reasonable-Notice” Test for § 501(b) Union-Member Demands

Gardner v. IAM: The Fourth Circuit Adopts a “Reasonable-Notice” Test for § 501(b) Union-Member Demands

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Gardner v. International Association of Machinists (4th Cir. 2025) Establishing the “Reasonable-Notice” Standard for § 501(b) Demands I. Introduction In Sandra Gardner v. International Association of...
Second Department Clarifies “Reasonable Time” for Substitution Under CPLR 1021 Amid Insurer Liquidation Stays: Dagastino v. Crown Container, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04627)

Second Department Clarifies “Reasonable Time” for Substitution Under CPLR 1021 Amid Insurer Liquidation Stays: Dagastino v. Crown Container, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04627)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Second Department Clarifies “Reasonable Time” for Substitution Under CPLR 1021 Amid Insurer Liquidation Stays Dagastino v. Crown Container, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04627) Introduction In Dagastino v....
Negligent Escrow Misappropriation and Failure to Reconcile Warrant Suspension Despite Remedial Steps: Commentary on Matter of Stutman (2025 NY Slip Op 04655)

Negligent Escrow Misappropriation and Failure to Reconcile Warrant Suspension Despite Remedial Steps: Commentary on Matter of Stutman (2025 NY Slip Op 04655)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Negligent Escrow Misappropriation and Failure to Reconcile Warrant Suspension Despite Remedial Steps: Matter of Stutman Introduction Matter of Stutman (2025 NY Slip Op 04655) is a per curiam...
Nonpayment of Binding Part 137 Fee Arbitration Awards as Professional Misconduct Under Rules 1.15(c)(4) and 8.4: Matter of O’Brien

Nonpayment of Binding Part 137 Fee Arbitration Awards as Professional Misconduct Under Rules 1.15(c)(4) and 8.4: Matter of O’Brien

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Nonpayment of Binding Part 137 Fee Arbitration Awards as Professional Misconduct Under Rules 1.15(c)(4) and 8.4: Matter of O’Brien Introduction In Matter of O’Brien (2025 NY Slip Op 04651), the...
Completion of Services Is Not Enough: Second Department Clarifies “Diligent Efforts” and the “Insight” Requirement in Permanent Neglect Terminations

Completion of Services Is Not Enough: Second Department Clarifies “Diligent Efforts” and the “Insight” Requirement in Permanent Neglect Terminations

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Completion of Services Is Not Enough: Second Department Clarifies “Diligent Efforts” and the “Insight” Requirement in Permanent Neglect Terminations Case: Matter of Benz G. (Nadia B.) — In the...
Supervisory Liability of Individual Clinicians Survives While Corporate Negligent Hiring Claims Fall Under Respondeat Superior: Commentary on Garcia v. Hollander (2025 NY Slip Op 04634)

Supervisory Liability of Individual Clinicians Survives While Corporate Negligent Hiring Claims Fall Under Respondeat Superior: Commentary on Garcia v. Hollander (2025 NY Slip Op 04634)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Supervisory Liability of Individual Clinicians Survives While Corporate Negligent Hiring Claims Fall Under Respondeat Superior: Garcia v. Hollander (2025 NY Slip Op 04634) Introduction In Garcia v....
Lefors v. Lefors: Stacking Per‑Violation Civil Penalties and No Show‑Cause Requirement for Visitation-Order Sanctions Under SDCL 25‑4A‑5

Lefors v. Lefors: Stacking Per‑Violation Civil Penalties and No Show‑Cause Requirement for Visitation-Order Sanctions Under SDCL 25‑4A‑5

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Lefors v. Lefors: Stacking Per‑Violation Civil Penalties and No Show‑Cause Requirement for Visitation-Order Sanctions Under SDCL 25‑4A‑5 Introduction In Lefors v. Lefors, 2025 S.D. 46, the Supreme...
ERISA “Any Occupation” Denials: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unsupported FCEs May Be Discounted, SSA Awards Are Non‑Dispositive, and Rule 52 Bench Decisions on Agreed Administrative Records Are Proper

ERISA “Any Occupation” Denials: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unsupported FCEs May Be Discounted, SSA Awards Are Non‑Dispositive, and Rule 52 Bench Decisions on Agreed Administrative Records Are Proper

Date: Aug 14, 2025
ERISA “Any Occupation” Denials: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Unsupported FCEs May Be Discounted, SSA Awards Are Non‑Dispositive, and Rule 52 Bench Decisions on Agreed Administrative Records Are...
Encounter‑Specific EDTPA Immunity: Sapienza v. Tromba Clarifies the “Impact” Requirement and Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of EDTPA Repeal

Encounter‑Specific EDTPA Immunity: Sapienza v. Tromba Clarifies the “Impact” Requirement and Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of EDTPA Repeal

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Encounter‑Specific EDTPA Immunity: Sapienza v. Tromba Clarifies the “Impact” Requirement and Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of EDTPA Repeal Introduction Sapienza v. Tromba (2025 NY Slip Op 04672) is a...
Cooperative Corporations as “Owners” for Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6): Proprietary-Lease Nexus Confirmed; Device-Quality Regulations (12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16) Inapplicable When No Device Is Supplied

Cooperative Corporations as “Owners” for Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6): Proprietary-Lease Nexus Confirmed; Device-Quality Regulations (12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16) Inapplicable When No Device Is Supplied

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Cooperative Corporations as “Owners” for Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6): Proprietary-Lease Nexus Confirmed; Device-Quality Regulations (12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16) Inapplicable When No Device Is...
Including Children in Orders of Protection Requires Demonstrable Exposure or Endangerment: Second Department’s Clarification in Laura W. v. John U. (2025)

Including Children in Orders of Protection Requires Demonstrable Exposure or Endangerment: Second Department’s Clarification in Laura W. v. John U. (2025)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Including Children in Orders of Protection Requires Demonstrable Exposure or Endangerment: Second Department’s Clarification in Laura W. v. John U. (2025) Court: Appellate Division, Second...
Judicial Notice Has Limits: Eleventh Circuit Bars Reliance on NLRB Dismissal Reasoning at Rule 12(b)(6) and Holds Nepotism Allegations Plausibly State a Duty-of-Fair-Representation Claim

Judicial Notice Has Limits: Eleventh Circuit Bars Reliance on NLRB Dismissal Reasoning at Rule 12(b)(6) and Holds Nepotism Allegations Plausibly State a Duty-of-Fair-Representation Claim

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Judicial Notice Has Limits: Eleventh Circuit Bars Reliance on NLRB Dismissal Reasoning at Rule 12(b)(6) and Holds Nepotism Allegations Plausibly State a Duty-of-Fair-Representation Claim Introduction...
Settlement Allocution as Conclusive Documentary Evidence Defeating Post‑Settlement Malpractice Claims: Valentina v. Beckerman (2025)

Settlement Allocution as Conclusive Documentary Evidence Defeating Post‑Settlement Malpractice Claims: Valentina v. Beckerman (2025)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Settlement Allocution as Conclusive Documentary Evidence Defeating Post‑Settlement Malpractice Claims: Valentina v. Beckerman Citation: Valentina v. Beckerman, 2025 NY Slip Op 04682 (App. Div. 2d...
CEEFPA Hardship Declarations Are Not an “Appearance”: Second Department Clarifies No Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions

CEEFPA Hardship Declarations Are Not an “Appearance”: Second Department Clarifies No Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions

Date: Aug 14, 2025
CEEFPA Hardship Declarations Are Not an “Appearance”: Second Department Clarifies No Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions Introduction In U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Lane (2025 NY Slip...
Oversight Duties Defeat Common‑Law Indemnity and Contribution; Prime‑Contract Indemnity Does Not Flow Down Without Clear Incorporation — Town of Oyster Bay v. Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04679)

Oversight Duties Defeat Common‑Law Indemnity and Contribution; Prime‑Contract Indemnity Does Not Flow Down Without Clear Incorporation — Town of Oyster Bay v. Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04679)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Oversight Duties Defeat Common‑Law Indemnity and Contribution; Prime‑Contract Indemnity Does Not Flow Down Without Clear Incorporation Case: Town of Oyster Bay v. Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc., 2025...
Functional Control at the Pleading Stage: New York’s Second Department Lowers the Barrier to Alleging Joint-Employer and Single-Enterprise Liability (Shujing Yu v. Mask Pot, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 04673)

Functional Control at the Pleading Stage: New York’s Second Department Lowers the Barrier to Alleging Joint-Employer and Single-Enterprise Liability (Shujing Yu v. Mask Pot, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 04673)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Functional Control at the Pleading Stage: New York’s Second Department Lowers the Barrier to Alleging Joint-Employer and Single-Enterprise Liability Introduction In Shujing Yu v. Mask Pot, Inc. (2025...
Pre‑2019 NYSHRL Standards Reaffirmed; Legitimate Elimination of Administrative Stipends Defeats Gender Discrimination and Retaliation Claims — Commentary on Niemotko v. Mount Saint Mary College (2025 NY Slip Op 04658)

Pre‑2019 NYSHRL Standards Reaffirmed; Legitimate Elimination of Administrative Stipends Defeats Gender Discrimination and Retaliation Claims — Commentary on Niemotko v. Mount Saint Mary College (2025 NY Slip Op 04658)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Pre‑2019 NYSHRL Standards Reaffirmed; Legitimate Elimination of Administrative Stipends Defeats Gender Discrimination and Retaliation Claims — Commentary on Niemotko v. Mount Saint Mary College (2025...
State v. Anderson: No Isomer Distinction—l‑Methamphetamine Is a Schedule II Substance; Broad Trial-Court Discretion Over Daubert Hearings and Expert Disclosures

State v. Anderson: No Isomer Distinction—l‑Methamphetamine Is a Schedule II Substance; Broad Trial-Court Discretion Over Daubert Hearings and Expert Disclosures

Date: Aug 14, 2025
State v. Anderson: No Isomer Distinction—l‑Methamphetamine Is a Schedule II Substance; Broad Trial-Court Discretion Over Daubert Hearings and Expert Disclosures Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota...
Anderson Industries v. Thermal Intelligence: Clarifying UCC Installment-Contract Breach and Flexible Contract Formation Under § 2-204

Anderson Industries v. Thermal Intelligence: Clarifying UCC Installment-Contract Breach and Flexible Contract Formation Under § 2-204

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Anderson Industries v. Thermal Intelligence: Clarifying UCC Installment-Contract Breach and Flexible Contract Formation Under § 2-204 Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota Citation: 2025 S.D. 47 Date:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert