Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

guardian-ad-litem&amp Case Commentaries

“Private Words, Public Peace” – State v. Baertsch and the Public-Disturbance Threshold for Disorderly Conduct

“Private Words, Public Peace” – State v. Baertsch and the Public-Disturbance Threshold for Disorderly Conduct

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Private Words, Public Peace” – State v. Baertsch and the Public-Disturbance Threshold for Disorderly Conduct 1. Introduction State v. Douglas Baertsch, 2025 MT 143, is a high-profile decision of the...
Schultz and the “Fictional Victim” Rule:  Mandatory-Minimum Enhancements Require an Actual Child Victim

Schultz and the “Fictional Victim” Rule: Mandatory-Minimum Enhancements Require an Actual Child Victim

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Schultz and the “Fictional Victim” Rule: Mandatory-Minimum Enhancements Require an Actual Child Victim Introduction State v. Schultz, 2025 MT 142, arises from an Internet sting in which David Ray...

        “Failing the PSI”: How Non-Compliance with Presentence Investigation Requirements Constitutes a
        Material Breach that Releases the State from Its Plea-Agreement Sentencing Recommendation —
        Commentary on State v. N. Huff, 2025 MT 152N

“Failing the PSI”: How Non-Compliance with Presentence Investigation Requirements Constitutes a Material Breach that Releases the State from Its Plea-Agreement Sentencing Recommendation — Commentary on State v. N. Huff, 2025 MT 152N

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Failing the PSI”: How Non-Compliance with Presentence Investigation Requirements Constitutes a Material Breach that Releases the State from Its Plea-Agreement Sentencing Recommendation — Commentary...
“Two Paths for Victim-Violence Evidence”: Clarifying Rule 404(a)(2) & 405(a) After State v. Donahue (2025 MT 144)

“Two Paths for Victim-Violence Evidence”: Clarifying Rule 404(a)(2) & 405(a) After State v. Donahue (2025 MT 144)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Two Paths for Victim-Violence Evidence” Clarifying Rule 404(a)(2) & 405(a) in Self-Defense Cases — Commentary on State v. R. Donahue, 2025 MT 144 1. Introduction In State v. Donahue the Montana...
Illustrative Evidence vs. Testimonial Content: The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification on Jury Access to Child-Witness Drawings in State v. Walks (2025 MT 147)

Illustrative Evidence vs. Testimonial Content: The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification on Jury Access to Child-Witness Drawings in State v. Walks (2025 MT 147)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Illustrative Evidence vs. Testimonial Content: The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification on Jury Access to Child-Witness Drawings in State v. Walks (2025 MT 147) Introduction State v. Stephen Eric...

        “Restoring the Road”: Stephenson v. Lone Peak – 2025 MT 148
        and the Refined Status-Quo Test for Preliminary Injunctions in Easement Disputes

“Restoring the Road”: Stephenson v. Lone Peak – 2025 MT 148 and the Refined Status-Quo Test for Preliminary Injunctions in Easement Disputes

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Restoring the Road”: Stephenson v. Lone Peak – 2025 MT 148 and the Refined Status-Quo Test for Preliminary Injunctions in Easement Disputes Introduction Stephenson v. Lone Peak, 2025 MT 148, is the...
Specificity as the Keystone: New Jersey Supreme Court Clarifies When Habit Evidence Creates a Rebuttable Presumption (Fazio v. Altice USA, 2025)

Specificity as the Keystone: New Jersey Supreme Court Clarifies When Habit Evidence Creates a Rebuttable Presumption (Fazio v. Altice USA, 2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Specificity as the Keystone: New Jersey Supreme Court Clarifies When Habit Evidence Creates a Rebuttable Presumption Commentary on Gerald Fazio Jr. v. Altice USA, 256 N.J. ___ (2025) 1. Introduction...
Exhaustion of CBA Remedies Applies to Non‑Signatory Residency Directors; No Tortious Interference Without an Existing Contract — Commentary on Golia v. Vieira (2025 NY Slip Op 04087)

Exhaustion of CBA Remedies Applies to Non‑Signatory Residency Directors; No Tortious Interference Without an Existing Contract — Commentary on Golia v. Vieira (2025 NY Slip Op 04087)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Exhaustion of CBA Remedies Applies to Non‑Signatory Residency Directors; No Tortious Interference Without an Existing Contract Commentary on Golia v. Vieira, 2025 NY Slip Op 04087 (App Div, 2d Dept)...
Equal Division Clarifies: Mass-Market Short‑Term Rentals Breach “Single Family Residence Purposes,” But Summer Homes Can Still Be “Residences”

Equal Division Clarifies: Mass-Market Short‑Term Rentals Breach “Single Family Residence Purposes,” But Summer Homes Can Still Be “Residences”

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Equal Division Clarifies: Mass-Market Short‑Term Rentals Breach “Single Family Residence Purposes,” But Summer Homes Can Still Be “Residences” Introduction In Melvin R. Berlin Revocable Trust v....
ER Admission Creates Reliance for Ostensible Agency Unless Effectively Disclaimed: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital

ER Admission Creates Reliance for Ostensible Agency Unless Effectively Disclaimed: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital

Date: Jul 10, 2025
ER Admission Creates Reliance for Ostensible Agency Unless Effectively Disclaimed: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital Introduction This commentary...
No Per Se OV 19 Score for Drug Possession During Jail Intake: Particularized Security‑Threat Findings Required

No Per Se OV 19 Score for Drug Possession During Jail Intake: Particularized Security‑Threat Findings Required

Date: Jul 10, 2025
No Per Se OV 19 Score for Drug Possession During Jail Intake: Particularized Security‑Threat Findings Required Introduction In People of Michigan v. Curtis Allen Morris (Mich. July 9, 2025), the...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies §523(a) Non-Dischargeability for Corporate Debtors Under Subchapter V

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies §523(a) Non-Dischargeability for Corporate Debtors Under Subchapter V

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies §523(a) Non-Dischargeability for Corporate Debtors Under Subchapter V Introduction In Benshot, LLC v. 2 Monkey Trading, LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
The Coletta Threshold: Rhode Island’s New Standard for Admitting False-Confession Expert Testimony

The Coletta Threshold: Rhode Island’s New Standard for Admitting False-Confession Expert Testimony

Date: Jul 10, 2025
The Coletta Threshold: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies the Foundation Required to Admit False-Confession Expert Testimony 1. Introduction State v. Joseph Coletta (R.I. Sup. Ct. July 9 2025) is a...
Strict Defamation Pleading and Litigation Privilege; NIED Duty Limits; and Timely CPLR 3211 Motions After Substituted Service — Orrego v. Knipfing (2025)

Strict Defamation Pleading and Litigation Privilege; NIED Duty Limits; and Timely CPLR 3211 Motions After Substituted Service — Orrego v. Knipfing (2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Strict Defamation Pleading and Litigation Privilege; NIED Duty Limits; and Timely CPLR 3211 Motions After Substituted Service — Orrego v. Knipfing (2025) Introduction In Orrego v. Knipfing (2025 NY...

    Eleventh Circuit Narrows Grable:  State-Law Contract Claims Alleging Unregistered Broker-Dealer Activity Do Not “Substantially” Raise a Federal Question

Eleventh Circuit Narrows Grable: State-Law Contract Claims Alleging Unregistered Broker-Dealer Activity Do Not “Substantially” Raise a Federal Question

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Narrows Grable: State-Law Contract Claims Alleging Unregistered Broker-Dealer Activity Do Not “Substantially” Raise a Federal Question Introduction AST & Science LLC (“AST”), a...
CPLR 306-b “Interest of Justice” Extensions After Defective Foreclosure Service; Borrower/Fee Owner’s Jurisdictional Absence Requires Dismissal of Remaining Parties

CPLR 306-b “Interest of Justice” Extensions After Defective Foreclosure Service; Borrower/Fee Owner’s Jurisdictional Absence Requires Dismissal of Remaining Parties

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Interest-of-Justice Extensions After Defective Foreclosure Service: Second Department Confirms CPLR 306-b Relief Absent Judgment and Reaffirms Necessity of Joining the Borrower/Fee Owner Introduction...
Temporal Proximity Alone Cannot Sustain a Pregnancy Discrimination Claim at the Pleading Stage When Employer Shows Contemporaneous Layoffs: Margarita v. Mountain Time Health, LLC

Temporal Proximity Alone Cannot Sustain a Pregnancy Discrimination Claim at the Pleading Stage When Employer Shows Contemporaneous Layoffs: Margarita v. Mountain Time Health, LLC

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Temporal Proximity Alone Cannot Sustain a Pregnancy Discrimination Claim at the Pleading Stage When Employer Shows Contemporaneous Layoffs: Margarita v. Mountain Time Health, LLC Introduction This...
Notice-of-Claim Prerequisite Extends to Economic Torts Against Village Officials Acting Within Scope; Donnelly Act and Tortious Interference Pleading Standards Reaffirmed — Commentary on Dibble v. Schroedel (2025 NY Slip Op 04083)

Notice-of-Claim Prerequisite Extends to Economic Torts Against Village Officials Acting Within Scope; Donnelly Act and Tortious Interference Pleading Standards Reaffirmed — Commentary on Dibble v. Schroedel (2025 NY Slip Op 04083)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Notice-of-Claim Prerequisite Extends to Economic Torts Against Village Officials Acting Within Scope; Donnelly Act and Tortious Interference Pleading Standards Reaffirmed Commentary on Dibble v....
Anti‑SLAPP Is No Shield to Reciprocal Attorney Discipline; Non‑Relitigation and Rule 8.2(a) Reaffirmed — Matter of Jacobs (2025 NY Slip Op 04093)

Anti‑SLAPP Is No Shield to Reciprocal Attorney Discipline; Non‑Relitigation and Rule 8.2(a) Reaffirmed — Matter of Jacobs (2025 NY Slip Op 04093)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Anti‑SLAPP Is No Shield to Reciprocal Attorney Discipline; Non‑Relitigation and Rule 8.2(a) Reaffirmed — Matter of Jacobs (2025 NY Slip Op 04093) Introduction Matter of Jacobs is a reciprocal...
Recasting Claims Cannot Evade Res Judicata: Dismissal With Prejudice Bars Later Money‑Had‑and‑Received, Conversion, and Interference Theories; No Fiduciary Duty Owed by Opposing Escrow Agent

Recasting Claims Cannot Evade Res Judicata: Dismissal With Prejudice Bars Later Money‑Had‑and‑Received, Conversion, and Interference Theories; No Fiduciary Duty Owed by Opposing Escrow Agent

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Recasting Claims Cannot Evade Res Judicata: Dismissal With Prejudice Bars Later Money‑Had‑and‑Received, Conversion, and Interference Theories; No Fiduciary Duty Owed by Opposing Escrow Agent Case:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert