Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

Voluntary Payments Bar Common-Law Refunds: Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Inland Container Test in T-Mobile v. Kentucky 911 Services Board

Voluntary Payments Bar Common-Law Refunds: Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Inland Container Test in T-Mobile v. Kentucky 911 Services Board

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Voluntary Payments Bar Common-Law Refunds: Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Inland Container Test in T-Mobile South LLC v. Kentucky 911 Services Board 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s...
“Abandonment-by-Conduct”: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that a Defendant’s Post-Invocation Behavior Can Waive the Right to Self-Representation

“Abandonment-by-Conduct”: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that a Defendant’s Post-Invocation Behavior Can Waive the Right to Self-Representation

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Abandonment-by-Conduct”: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that a Defendant’s Post-Invocation Behavior Can Waive the Right to Self-Representation Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s...
Impairment over Intoxication: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Elements of the 2023 Vehicular-Homicide Statute in Jent v. Commonwealth

Impairment over Intoxication: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Elements of the 2023 Vehicular-Homicide Statute in Jent v. Commonwealth

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Impairment over Intoxication: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Elements of the 2023 Vehicular-Homicide Statute in Jent v. Commonwealth 1. Introduction In Tracie Jent v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the...
“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1)

“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1) Author: AI Legal Commentary Service 1. Introduction In...
“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges

“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges 1. Introduction United States v....
“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio

“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio 1. Introduction On 18 June 2025 the Supreme Court...
“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” — Commentary on 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2, 2025-Ohio-2119

“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” — Commentary on 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2, 2025-Ohio-2119

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio, in its 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2 (2025-Ohio-2119),...
From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Aramark Corp. v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-2114)

From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Aramark Corp. v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-2114)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Commentary on Aramark Corp. v. Harris,...
“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters

“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters Supreme Court of Ohio – Slip Opinion No....
State ex rel. Macksyn v. Spencer: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s New 21-Day “Produce-or-Certify” Rule for Prison-Email Public-Records Requests

State ex rel. Macksyn v. Spencer: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s New 21-Day “Produce-or-Certify” Rule for Prison-Email Public-Records Requests

Date: Jun 23, 2025
State ex rel. Macksyn v. Spencer (2025-Ohio-2116) The Supreme Court of Ohio’s New 21-Day “Produce-or-Certify” Rule for Prison-Email Public-Records Requests 1. Introduction In State ex rel. Macksyn v....
Mandatory Compliance: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms Municipal-Court Judges’ Authority over Elected Clerks in Record-Access Matters

Mandatory Compliance: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms Municipal-Court Judges’ Authority over Elected Clerks in Record-Access Matters

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Mandatory Compliance: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms Municipal-Court Judges’ Authority over Elected Clerks in Record-Access Matters Introduction On 18 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Ohio delivered its...
The Dual-Trigger Doctrine: Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Multiple 60-Day Windows for PUCO Appeals

The Dual-Trigger Doctrine: Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Multiple 60-Day Windows for PUCO Appeals

Date: Jun 23, 2025
The Dual-Trigger Doctrine: Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Multiple 60-Day Windows for PUCO Appeals Introduction In In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., 2025-Ohio-2082, the Supreme Court of...
Exhaustion Doctrine Inapplicable to Public-Records Mandamus: A Commentary on State ex rel. Brown v. Sackett (2025-Ohio-2080)

Exhaustion Doctrine Inapplicable to Public-Records Mandamus: A Commentary on State ex rel. Brown v. Sackett (2025-Ohio-2080)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Exhaustion Doctrine Inapplicable to Public-Records Mandamus: Comprehensive Commentary on State ex rel. Brown v. Sackett (2025-Ohio-2080) Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision in State ex...
“Reasonable Period” Redefined:  State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. Phillips (2025) and the Automatic $1,000 Cap for Delayed Public-Records Compliance

“Reasonable Period” Redefined: State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. Phillips (2025) and the Automatic $1,000 Cap for Delayed Public-Records Compliance

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Reasonable Period” Redefined: State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. Phillips (2025) and the Automatic $1,000 Cap for Delayed Public-Records Compliance 1. Introduction Ohio’s Public Records Act (R.C. 149.43)...
“From Privileged Memo to Public Record” – The Ohio Supreme Court’s New Two-Track Rule on Transmittal E-mails and Unauthorized Forwards (Commentary on State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2025-Ohio-2079)

“From Privileged Memo to Public Record” – The Ohio Supreme Court’s New Two-Track Rule on Transmittal E-mails and Unauthorized Forwards (Commentary on State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2025-Ohio-2079)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Privileged Memo to Public Record” – The Ohio Supreme Court’s New Two-Track Rule on Transmittal E-mails and Unauthorized Forwards Commentary on State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of...
Within-Guidelines Sentences Are Not Inherently Reasonable: Welch, J., Urges Limits on Speculative Conduct and a Meaningful Proportionality Review in People v. McSorley

Within-Guidelines Sentences Are Not Inherently Reasonable: Welch, J., Urges Limits on Speculative Conduct and a Meaningful Proportionality Review in People v. McSorley

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Within-Guidelines Sentences Are Not Inherently Reasonable: Welch, J., Urges Limits on Speculative Conduct and a Meaningful Proportionality Review in People v. McSorley Introduction In People of...
Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA

Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA Introduction Stanley v. City of Sanford, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), is the Supreme Court’s...
Jackson v. State Farm: Enforcing Contractual Choice-of-Law Clauses that Import a Foreign Statute of Limitations into Alabama Litigation

Jackson v. State Farm: Enforcing Contractual Choice-of-Law Clauses that Import a Foreign Statute of Limitations into Alabama Litigation

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Jackson v. State Farm: Enforcing Contractual Choice-of-Law Clauses that Import a Foreign Statute of Limitations into Alabama Litigation Introduction Court & Date: Supreme Court of Alabama, 20 June...

        Posey Has Teeth: Substantive Unreasonableness and the Limits of the “Presumption of Proportionality” for
        Within-Guidelines Sentences – Comment on People v. McSorley

Posey Has Teeth: Substantive Unreasonableness and the Limits of the “Presumption of Proportionality” for Within-Guidelines Sentences – Comment on People v. McSorley

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Posey Has Teeth: Substantive Unreasonableness and the Limits of the “Presumption of Proportionality” for Within-Guidelines Sentences – Comment on People of Michigan v. Troy Cameron McSorley 1....
“Visual-Compactness” over Algorithms:  The New Jersey Supreme Court Defines the Boundaries of Municipal Redistricting Discretion

“Visual-Compactness” over Algorithms: The New Jersey Supreme Court Defines the Boundaries of Municipal Redistricting Discretion

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Visual-Compactness” over Algorithms: Supreme Court Clarifies the Municipal Ward Law in Jersey City United Against the New Ward Map v. Jersey City Ward Commission 1. Introduction Following Jersey...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert