establishing-personal-jurisdiction-requires-targeted-activities Case Commentaries

Competitor Unfair-Competition Claims Fall Outside Platform Ad-Term Arbitration Clauses Absent a Sufficient Nexus to the Advertiser Relationship

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Competitor Unfair-Competition Claims Fall Outside Platform Ad-Term Arbitration Clauses Absent a Sufficient Nexus to the Advertiser Relationship Case: Metroplex Communications, Inc. v. Meta Platforms,...

United States v. Musselman: Harmless-Foreperson Internet “Roadmap” Misconduct and Heightened-Duty Willful Blindness for the Ostrich Instruction

Date: Aug 29, 2026

United States v. Musselman: Harmless-Foreperson Internet “Roadmap” Misconduct and Heightened-Duty Willful Blindness for the Ostrich Instruction Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit...

United States v. Carrie Musselman: Waiver of Remmer Uncertainty and “Ostrich” Knowledge in Healthcare-Billing Fraud

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Waiver of Remmer Uncertainty & Willful-Blindness (“Ostrich”) Knowledge in Medicare Billing Fraud Case: United States v. Carrie Musselman (Nos. 25-2173 & 25-2494) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...

Sixth Circuit: State-Created Danger Does Not Reach Noncustodial Suicide; Suicide Breaks Duty and Causation for Substantive Due Process Claims

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Sixth Circuit: State-Created Danger Does Not Reach Noncustodial Suicide; Suicide Breaks Duty and Causation for Substantive Due Process Claims I. Introduction Case: Brian Zimmermann v. Scott Labish,...

Sixth Circuit: State-Created Danger Does Not Extend to Noncustodial Suicide; Immunities Require Dismissal

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Zimmermann v. Labish: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms That the State-Created Danger Doctrine Does Not Reach Noncustodial Suicide—and Immunities Require Early Dismissal Case: Brian Zimmermann v. Scott...

United States v. Hern (6th Cir. Aug. 27, 2026) — RICO “Would-Exist” Enterprise Instructions, Semi-Anonymous Juries, and Confrontation Clause Trial Delays

Date: Aug 29, 2026

RICO Conspiracy May Be Proven by Agreement to Join an Enterprise that “Existed or Would Exist”: Sixth Circuit Also Upholds Semi-Anonymous Jury and COVID-Era Delay Between Direct and Cross I....

RICO Conspiracy May Rest on an Agreement to Participate in an Enterprise That “Existed or Would Exist” Without Constructively Amending the Indictment

Date: Aug 29, 2026

RICO Conspiracy May Rest on an Agreement to Participate in an Enterprise That “Existed or Would Exist” Without Constructively Amending the Indictment 1. Introduction United States v. Jason Meyerholz...

Affirmance Without Resolving Discretionary-Clause Choice-of-Law: ERISA LTD Denial Upheld Under Assumed De Novo Review

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Affirmance Without Resolving Discretionary-Clause Choice-of-Law: ERISA LTD Denial Upheld Under Assumed De Novo Review 1. Introduction In Grice v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (5th Cir. Aug....

Mandamus Requires Expedited Younger Abstention Review of State-Court Bail Oversight Consent Decrees Before Imminent Judicial Elections

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Mandamus Requires Expedited Younger Abstention Review of State-Court Bail Oversight Consent Decrees Before Imminent Judicial Elections Case: In re Honorable Paula Goodhart; Honorable Jessica Padilla;...

No Plain Error from “Retreat” Language When the Revocation Court Is Finding Disproportionate Self-Defense Force Under Texas Penal Code § 9.31

Date: Aug 29, 2026

No Plain Error from “Retreat” Language When the Revocation Court Is Finding Disproportionate Self-Defense Force Under Texas Penal Code § 9.31 I. Introduction In United States v. Moses (5th Cir. Aug....

Law-of-the-Case Precludes Renewed “Letter of No Objection” Demands; Purchaser Default at a Time-of-the-Essence Closing Defeats Specific Performance and CPLR 5107 Relief

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Law-of-the-Case Precludes Renewed “Letter of No Objection” Demands; Purchaser Default at a Time-of-the-Essence Closing Defeats Specific Performance and CPLR 5107 Relief 1. Introduction Chao-Yu C....

Ohio “In Consequence Of” Fraud Exclusion: No Malpractice Indemnity When Negligence Damages Are Not Independent of Intentional Misrepresentation; No Third-Party Bad-Faith Claims

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Ohio “In Consequence Of” Fraud Exclusion: No Malpractice Indemnity When Negligence Damages Are Not Independent of Intentional Misrepresentation; No Third-Party Bad-Faith Claims Introduction Case:...

“In Consequence of” Means Direct-and-Inseparable: Ohio Malpractice Coverage Is Barred Where Negligence Damages Cannot Be Separated from the Surgeon’s Fraud; Third-Party Bad-Faith Claims Remain Unavailable

Date: Aug 29, 2026

“In Consequence of” Means Direct-and-Inseparable: Ohio Malpractice Coverage Is Barred Where Negligence Damages Cannot Be Separated from the Surgeon’s Fraud; Third-Party Bad-Faith Claims Remain...

Interpreting “In Consequence of” in Ohio Malpractice Policies: Direct-and-Inseparable Causation for Fraud Exclusions and No Third-Party Bad-Faith Claims

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Interpreting “In Consequence of” in Ohio Malpractice Policies: Direct-and-Inseparable Causation for Fraud Exclusions and No Third-Party Bad-Faith Claims 1. Introduction In Mackenzie Bender v. Med....

“In Consequence of” Fraud Exclusion Requires Direct, Inseparable Damages; Ohio Bars Third‑Party Bad‑Faith Workarounds Against Insurers

Date: Aug 29, 2026

“In Consequence of” Fraud Exclusion Requires Direct, Inseparable Damages; Ohio Bars Third‑Party Bad‑Faith Workarounds Against Insurers Introduction Patricia Adams v. Med. Protective Co. is a...

“In Consequence of” Fraud Means Damages that Directly Stem from and Are Inseparable from Intentional Misrepresentation (and Third-Party Claimants Cannot Recast Bad Faith as Fraud) — Adams v. Medical Protective Co.

Date: Aug 29, 2026

“In Consequence of” Fraud Means Damages that Directly Stem from and Are Inseparable from Intentional Misrepresentation (and Third-Party Claimants Cannot Recast Bad Faith as Fraud) Case: Patricia...

COVID-Driven Delay in Cross-Examination Does Not Violate the Confrontation Clause; “Would Exist” RICO-Enterprise Instructions Do Not Amend the Indictment (Sixth Circuit)

Date: Aug 29, 2026

COVID-Driven Delay in Cross-Examination Does Not Violate the Confrontation Clause; “Would Exist” RICO-Enterprise Instructions Do Not Amend the Indictment Case: United States v. Michael Forrester,...

Opportunity, Not Immediacy: COVID-Related Cross-Examination Delays Do Not Violate the Confrontation Clause in Multi-Defendant RICO Trials

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Opportunity, Not Immediacy: COVID-Related Cross-Examination Delays Do Not Violate the Confrontation Clause in Multi-Defendant RICO Trials Commentary on United States v. James Wesley Frazier...

Confrontation Clause “Effective Opportunity” Survives a Multi‑Week Mid‑Testimony Recess: Sixth Circuit Affirms COVID‑Era Joint RICO Trial Management

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Confrontation Clause “Effective Opportunity” Survives a Multi‑Week Mid‑Testimony Recess: Sixth Circuit Affirms COVID‑Era Joint RICO Trial Management I. Introduction In United States v. Michael...

Sixth Circuit Validates “Enterprise Existed or Would Exist” RICO-Conspiracy Instruction and Upholds Delayed Cross-Examination Amid COVID Disruptions

Date: Aug 29, 2026

Sixth Circuit Validates “Enterprise Existed or Would Exist” RICO-Conspiracy Instruction and Upholds Delayed Cross-Examination Amid COVID Disruptions 1. Introduction In United States v. William...