Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

defendant&amp Case Commentaries

Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range

Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range...
Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice

Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice Case: United States v. Jorge...
Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption

Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption Case:...
Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion

Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion Case: United States v. Jeffrey Colin...
Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets

Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets Introduction In United States v. Natalya Shvets, the Third...
Explicit Warnings Suffice as “Lesser Sanctions”: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Repeated Defiance of Deposition Orders in Lee v. Southwest Airlines

Explicit Warnings Suffice as “Lesser Sanctions”: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Repeated Defiance of Deposition Orders in Lee v. Southwest Airlines

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Explicit Warnings Suffice as “Lesser Sanctions”: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Repeated Defiance of Deposition Orders in Lee v. Southwest Airlines Introduction This commentary...
No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott

No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott Introduction In Savage v. Westcott, the United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence Case: Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Eagle's Pointe, LLC, No....
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b) Introduction In...
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge Introduction In Swepson v. Aimbridge Employee...
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler) Note: This Order and Judgment...
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid Introduction In United States v. Reilly...
Futility Requires Evidence and CAT Demands Official Acquiescence: Guidance from Masaquiza‑Masaquiza v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Futility Requires Evidence and CAT Demands Official Acquiescence: Guidance from Masaquiza‑Masaquiza v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Futility Requires Evidence and CAT Demands Official Acquiescence: Guidance from Masaquiza‑Masaquiza v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) Note: This decision is a Summary Order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss

Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss Introduction In Fahrnow v. E-5 Oilfield Services, 2025 MT 220, the Montana...
Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period

Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period Case: In re A.F. and H.J., No. 24-574 Court: Supreme Court...
Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists Case: In re A.A., K.A., and A.R., No. 24-474 (W. Va. Sept. 30,...
In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation

In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation Introduction In a memorandum decision dated...
In re G.A.: West Virginia High Court Reaffirms Written-Motion Prerequisite for Improvement Periods and Clarifies That Less Restrictive Alternatives Are Not Required When Statutory Termination Criteria Are Met

In re G.A.: West Virginia High Court Reaffirms Written-Motion Prerequisite for Improvement Periods and Clarifies That Less Restrictive Alternatives Are Not Required When Statutory Termination Criteria Are Met

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re G.A.: Reaffirming the Written-Motion Requirement for Improvement Periods and the Permissibility of Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives Introduction In a memorandum decision issued...
Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption

Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption Introduction In In re R.L., No. 24-395 (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025), the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming Denial of Improvement Periods and Termination Where Parent Fails to Engage: West Virginia High Court’s Memorandum Decision in In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K.

Reaffirming Denial of Improvement Periods and Termination Where Parent Fails to Engage: West Virginia High Court’s Memorandum Decision in In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K.

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming Denial of Improvement Periods and Termination Where Parent Fails to Engage: West Virginia High Court’s Memorandum Decision in In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K. Introduction This commentary...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.