Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

KSR v. Teleflex: Supreme Court Reforms Obviousness Standard in Patent Law

KSR v. Teleflex: Supreme Court Reforms Obviousness Standard in Patent Law

Date: May 1, 2007
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.: Supreme Court Reforms Obviousness Standard in Patent Law Introduction KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (550 U.S. 398, 2007) is a landmark decision by the...
Exclusive Remedy for Wrongful Tax Levies Established in EC Term of Years Trust v. United States

Exclusive Remedy for Wrongful Tax Levies Established in EC Term of Years Trust v. United States

Date: May 1, 2007
Exclusive Remedy for Wrongful Tax Levies Established in EC Term of Years Trust v. United States Introduction In EC Term of Years Trust v. United States, 550 U.S. 429 (2007), the United States Supreme...
United Haulers Association v. Oneida-Herkimer: Public Advantage and the Dormant Commerce Clause

United Haulers Association v. Oneida-Herkimer: Public Advantage and the Dormant Commerce Clause

Date: May 1, 2007
United Haulers Association v. Oneida-Herkimer: Public Advantage and the Dormant Commerce Clause Introduction United Haulers Association, Inc., et al. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management...
Reasonableness of Police Use of Force in High-Speed Pursuits: Scott v. Harris

Reasonableness of Police Use of Force in High-Speed Pursuits: Scott v. Harris

Date: May 1, 2007
Reasonableness of Police Use of Force in High-Speed Pursuits: Scott v. Harris Introduction Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Enforcing Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: SMITH v. TEXAS Decision

Enforcing Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: SMITH v. TEXAS Decision

Date: Apr 26, 2007
Enforcing Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: SMITH v. TEXAS Decision Introduction SMITH v. TEXAS, 550 U.S. 297 (2007), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Considerations for Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Considerations for Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Date: Apr 26, 2007
Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Considerations for Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case Brent Ray Brewer v. Nathaniel Quarterman (550 U.S. 286, 2007), the...
Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing: ABDUL-KABIR v. QUARTERMAN

Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing: ABDUL-KABIR v. QUARTERMAN

Date: Apr 26, 2007
Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing: ABDUL-KABIR v. QUARTERMAN Introduction Jalil Abdul-Kabir v. Nathaniel Quarterman, 550 U.S. 233 (2007), is a significant Supreme...
Brewer v. Quarterman: Ensuring Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Brewer v. Quarterman: Ensuring Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Date: Apr 26, 2007
Brewer v. Quarterman: Ensuring Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Brewer v. Quarterman, 550 U.S. 286 (2007), is a landmark decision by the United...
Reaffirming the Adequacy of Mitigating Evidence Consideration in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of SMITH v. TEXAS

Reaffirming the Adequacy of Mitigating Evidence Consideration in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of SMITH v. TEXAS

Date: Apr 26, 2007
Reaffirming the Adequacy of Mitigating Evidence Consideration in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of SMITH v. TEXAS Introduction SMITH v. TEXAS (550 U.S. 297, 2007) is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Attempted Burglary Recognized as Violent Felony under ACCA: James v. United States

Attempted Burglary Recognized as Violent Felony under ACCA: James v. United States

Date: Apr 19, 2007
Attempted Burglary Recognized as Violent Felony under ACCA: James v. United States Introduction James v. United States (550 U.S. 192, 2007) is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: Establishing New Precedent

Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: Establishing New Precedent

Date: Apr 19, 2007
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: Establishing New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. Leroy Carhart et al., decided on April...
Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 in Gonzales v. Carhart et al.

Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 in Gonzales v. Carhart et al.

Date: Apr 19, 2007
Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 in Gonzales v. Carhart et al. Introduction In Gonzales, Attorney General v. Carhart et al., decided on April 18, 2007, the United States...
Reaffirming the Classification of Attempted Burglary as a Violent Felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Reaffirming the Classification of Attempted Burglary as a Violent Felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Date: Apr 19, 2007
Reaffirming the Classification of Attempted Burglary as a Violent Felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction In James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192 (2007), the United States Supreme...
Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.: Expanding Private Rights under the Communications Act

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.: Expanding Private Rights under the Communications Act

Date: Apr 18, 2007
Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.: Expanding Private Rights under the Communications Act Introduction In Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v....
Exclusive Federal Oversight of National Bank Operating Subsidiaries: Insights from WATTERS v. WACHOVIA BANK

Exclusive Federal Oversight of National Bank Operating Subsidiaries: Insights from WATTERS v. WACHOVIA BANK

Date: Apr 18, 2007
Exclusive Federal Oversight of National Bank Operating Subsidiaries: Insights from WATTERS v. WACHOVIA BANK Introduction The Supreme Court case Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (550 U.S. 1, 2007)...
Supreme Court Upholds Department of Education's Method for Equalizing School Expenditures

Supreme Court Upholds Department of Education's Method for Equalizing School Expenditures

Date: Apr 18, 2007
Supreme Court Upholds Department of Education's Method for Equalizing School Expenditures Introduction In Zuni Public School District No. 89 et al. v. Department of Education et al., 550 U.S. 81...
Zuni v. Department of Education: Affirming Agency Discretion in Equalizing School Expenditures Under Impact Aid

Zuni v. Department of Education: Affirming Agency Discretion in Equalizing School Expenditures Under Impact Aid

Date: Apr 18, 2007
Zuni v. Department of Education: Affirming Agency Discretion in Equalizing School Expenditures Under Impact Aid Introduction Zuni Public School District No. 89 et al. v. Department of Education et...
Global Crossing v. Metrophones: Affirming Private Remedies for Unreasonable Carrier Practices Under the Communications Act

Global Crossing v. Metrophones: Affirming Private Remedies for Unreasonable Carrier Practices Under the Communications Act

Date: Apr 18, 2007
Global Crossing v. Metrophones: Affirming Private Remedies for Unreasonable Carrier Practices Under the Communications Act Introduction In Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones...
Preemption of State Regulations over National Bank Operating Subsidiaries under the National Bank Act

Preemption of State Regulations over National Bank Operating Subsidiaries under the National Bank Act

Date: Apr 18, 2007
Preemption of State Regulations over National Bank Operating Subsidiaries under the National Bank Act Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Watters, 550 U.S. 1...
Supreme Court Upholds Exhaustion of Remedies Doctrine: Denial of Certiorari in Al Odah v. United States

Supreme Court Upholds Exhaustion of Remedies Doctrine: Denial of Certiorari in Al Odah v. United States

Date: Apr 3, 2007
Supreme Court Upholds Exhaustion of Remedies Doctrine: Denial of Certiorari in Al Odah v. United States Introduction In the landmark case Al Odah, Next Friend of Al Odah, et al. v. United States et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert