Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Twombly v. Bell Atlantic: Redefining Antitrust Pleading Standards Introduction Twombly v. Bell Atlantic, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Exhaustion of State Remedies under AEDPA: An Analysis of Roper v. Weaver Introduction Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center v. Weaver is a notable case adjudicated by the United States...
Schriro v. Landrigan: Upholding District Courts' Discretion in Granting Evidentiary Hearings under AEDPA Case: Dora B. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Petitioner, v. Jeffrey...
Limits on Evidentiary Hearings for Ineffective Assistance Claims under AEDPA: Schriro v. Landrigan Introduction Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. Landrigan, AKA Hill, 550 U.S....
Flow Control Ordinances Favoring Public Entities Upheld under Dormant Commerce Clause Introduction In United Haulers Association, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, 550 U.S....
Microsoft Corp. v. ATT Corp.: Limiting §271(f) Liability for Software Components Introduction Microsoft Corp. v. ATT Corp., 550 U.S. 437 (2007), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that scrutinized...
Software Supply and Patent Infringement: Insights from Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. Introduction In the landmark case of Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp., decided by the United States Supreme Court on...
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.: Supreme Court Reforms Obviousness Standard in Patent Law Introduction KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (550 U.S. 398, 2007) is a landmark decision by the...
Exclusive Remedy for Wrongful Tax Levies Established in EC Term of Years Trust v. United States Introduction In EC Term of Years Trust v. United States, 550 U.S. 429 (2007), the United States Supreme...
United Haulers Association v. Oneida-Herkimer: Public Advantage and the Dormant Commerce Clause Introduction United Haulers Association, Inc., et al. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management...
Reasonableness of Police Use of Force in High-Speed Pursuits: Scott v. Harris Introduction Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Enforcing Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: SMITH v. TEXAS Decision Introduction SMITH v. TEXAS, 550 U.S. 297 (2007), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Considerations for Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case Brent Ray Brewer v. Nathaniel Quarterman (550 U.S. 286, 2007), the...
Reaffirming the Adequacy of Mitigating Evidence Consideration in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of SMITH v. TEXAS Introduction SMITH v. TEXAS (550 U.S. 297, 2007) is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing: ABDUL-KABIR v. QUARTERMAN Introduction Jalil Abdul-Kabir v. Nathaniel Quarterman, 550 U.S. 233 (2007), is a significant Supreme...
Brewer v. Quarterman: Ensuring Meaningful Consideration of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Brewer v. Quarterman, 550 U.S. 286 (2007), is a landmark decision by the United...
Attempted Burglary Recognized as Violent Felony under ACCA: James v. United States Introduction James v. United States (550 U.S. 192, 2007) is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: Establishing New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. Leroy Carhart et al., decided on April...
Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 in Gonzales v. Carhart et al. Introduction In Gonzales, Attorney General v. Carhart et al., decided on April 18, 2007, the United States...
Reaffirming the Classification of Attempted Burglary as a Violent Felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction In James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192 (2007), the United States Supreme...