Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Direct Enforcement of the Takings Clause: Insights from DeVillier v. Texas

Direct Enforcement of the Takings Clause: Insights from DeVillier v. Texas

Date: Apr 17, 2024
Direct Enforcement of the Takings Clause: Insights from DeVillier v. Texas Introduction In Richard DeVillier, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed a pivotal...
Supreme Court Upholds Limited Scope of Preliminary Injunctions in RAUL LABRADOR v. PAM POE

Supreme Court Upholds Limited Scope of Preliminary Injunctions in RAUL LABRADOR v. PAM POE

Date: Apr 16, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Limited Scope of Preliminary Injunctions in RAUL LABRADOR v. PAM POE Introduction The Supreme Court case RAUL LABRADOR, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IDAHO v. PAM POE addresses the scope...
Strengthening Batson Analysis: Insights from Dillion Gage Compton v. Texas

Strengthening Batson Analysis: Insights from Dillion Gage Compton v. Texas

Date: Apr 16, 2024
Strengthening Batson Analysis: Insights from Dillion Gage Compton v. Texas Introduction Dillion Gage Compton v. Texas is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April...
Pure Omissions and SEC Rule 10b-5(b): Supreme Court Establishes Clear Boundaries in Moab Partners v. Macquarie Infrastructure

Pure Omissions and SEC Rule 10b-5(b): Supreme Court Establishes Clear Boundaries in Moab Partners v. Macquarie Infrastructure

Date: Apr 13, 2024
Pure Omissions and SEC Rule 10b-5(b): Supreme Court Establishes Clear Boundaries in Moab Partners v. Macquarie Infrastructure Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States delivered a landmark...
FAA §1 Exemption: Defining Transportation Workers by Role, Not Industry

FAA §1 Exemption: Defining Transportation Workers by Role, Not Industry

Date: Apr 13, 2024
FAA §1 Exemption: Defining Transportation Workers by Role, Not Industry Introduction In 601 U.S. (2024) v. LePAGE BAKERIES PARK ST., LLC, et al., the Supreme Court of the United States addressed a...
Supreme Court Clarifies Equal Applicability of the Takings Clause to Legislative and Administrative Permit Conditions in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado

Supreme Court Clarifies Equal Applicability of the Takings Clause to Legislative and Administrative Permit Conditions in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado

Date: Apr 13, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Equal Applicability of the Takings Clause to Legislative and Administrative Permit Conditions in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado Introduction In George Sheetz v. County of El...
Supreme Court Denies Vacate Stay Applications, Clarifies Use of Administrative Stays in Immigration Enforcement

Supreme Court Denies Vacate Stay Applications, Clarifies Use of Administrative Stays in Immigration Enforcement

Date: Mar 20, 2024
Supreme Court Denies Vacate Stay Applications, Clarifies Use of Administrative Stays in Immigration Enforcement Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Texas, et al. LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT...
Exceptional Hardship Reviewability under §1252(a)(2)(D): An Examination of 601 U.S. (2024) v. Garland

Exceptional Hardship Reviewability under §1252(a)(2)(D): An Examination of 601 U.S. (2024) v. Garland

Date: Mar 20, 2024
Exceptional Hardship Reviewability under §1252(a)(2)(D): An Examination of 601 U.S. (2024) v. Garland Introduction In the landmark case 601 U.S. (2024) v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General Situ...
Fikre v. FBI: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Mootness of No Fly List Challenge

Fikre v. FBI: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Mootness of No Fly List Challenge

Date: Mar 20, 2024
Fikre v. FBI: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Mootness of No Fly List Challenge Introduction In the landmark case Fikre v. FBI, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the complex interplay...
Defining State Action: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Public Officials' Social Media Conduct

Defining State Action: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Public Officials' Social Media Conduct

Date: Mar 16, 2024
Defining State Action: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Public Officials' Social Media Conduct Introduction In the landmark case of Kevin Lindke v. James R. Freed, the Supreme Court of the United...
Pulsifer v. United States: Clarifying Safety Valve Eligibility Criteria

Pulsifer v. United States: Clarifying Safety Valve Eligibility Criteria

Date: Mar 16, 2024
Pulsifer v. United States: Clarifying Safety Valve Eligibility Criteria Introduction In Pulsifer v. United States, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed a pivotal issue concerning the...
Supreme Court Establishes Congressional Primacy in Enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment

Supreme Court Establishes Congressional Primacy in Enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment

Date: Mar 5, 2024
Supreme Court Establishes Congressional Primacy in Enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al., the Supreme Court of the...
Supreme Court Establishes that Bias Reporting Policies Do Not Constitute Moot Claims under First Amendment

Supreme Court Establishes that Bias Reporting Policies Do Not Constitute Moot Claims under First Amendment

Date: Mar 5, 2024
Supreme Court Establishes that Bias Reporting Policies Do Not Constitute Moot Claims under First Amendment Introduction In the landmark case Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy Sands, the Supreme Court of...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Inconsistent Verdicts: Analysis of 601 U.S. v. McElrath

Double Jeopardy Protections in Inconsistent Verdicts: Analysis of 601 U.S. v. McElrath

Date: Feb 22, 2024
Double Jeopardy Protections in Inconsistent Verdicts: Analysis of 601 U.S. v. McElrath Introduction The Supreme Court case 601 U.S. (2024) v. Georgia Damian McElrath, Petitioner establishes a...
Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Choice-of-Law Provisions in Maritime Contracts

Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Choice-of-Law Provisions in Maritime Contracts

Date: Feb 22, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Choice-of-Law Provisions in Maritime Contracts Introduction The case of Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC addresses the...
Scope of AEDPA §2244(b)(1) in Successive Habeas Petitions: In re Michael Bowe

Scope of AEDPA §2244(b)(1) in Successive Habeas Petitions: In re Michael Bowe

Date: Feb 21, 2024
Scope of AEDPA §2244(b)(1) in Successive Habeas Petitions: In re Michael Bowe Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in In re Michael Bowe, rendered on February 20, 2024, addresses a critical...
Implications of Lower Courts Dismissing Jurors Based on Religious Beliefs: A Commentary on Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Jean Finney

Implications of Lower Courts Dismissing Jurors Based on Religious Beliefs: A Commentary on Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Jean Finney

Date: Feb 21, 2024
Implications of Lower Courts Dismissing Jurors Based on Religious Beliefs: A Commentary on Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Jean Finney Introduction In the case Missouri Department of Corrections v....
Fourth Circuit Upholds Race-Neutral Admissions Policy: Implications and Critique

Fourth Circuit Upholds Race-Neutral Admissions Policy: Implications and Critique

Date: Feb 21, 2024
Fourth Circuit Upholds Race-Neutral Admissions Policy: Implications and Critique Introduction Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board is a significant case addressing the intersection of...
Clarifying Whistleblower Protections: Supreme Court Rules Retaliatory Intent Not Required under Sarbanes-Oxley §1514A

Clarifying Whistleblower Protections: Supreme Court Rules Retaliatory Intent Not Required under Sarbanes-Oxley §1514A

Date: Feb 9, 2024
Clarifying Whistleblower Protections: Supreme Court Rules Retaliatory Intent Not Required under Sarbanes-Oxley §1514A Introduction The Supreme Court's recent decision in TREVOR MURRAY, PETITIONER v....
Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in FCRA Allows Suits Against Federal Agencies

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in FCRA Allows Suits Against Federal Agencies

Date: Feb 9, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in FCRA Allows Suits Against Federal Agencies Introduction The case of Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert