Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Kansas v. Marsh: Upholding the Constitutionality of Equipoise-Based Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction Kansas v. Marsh addressed a pivotal question in capital punishment jurisprudence: whether a...
Erroneous Deprivation of Counsel of Choice: A Structural Error under the Sixth Amendment Introduction United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140 (2006), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Proper Exhaustion Required Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: An Analysis of Woodford v. Ngo Introduction Woodford et al. v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision...
Analysis of LABCORP v. Metabolite: Implications for Patent Protection of Natural Phenomena Introduction The case Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, DBA LabCorp v. Metabolite Laboratories,...
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White: Expanding the Scope of Title VII’s Anti-Retaliation Protections Introduction Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White (548 U.S. 53) is a...
IIRIRA §241(a)(5) and Its Application to Pre-IIRIRA Reentrants: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales Introduction Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales is a landmark decision by the United...
Duress Defense Burden of Proof Remains on Defendant in Federal Statutory Crimes Introduction Dixon v. United States, 548 U.S. 1 (2006), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Fourth Amendment Does Not Bar Suspicionless Searches of Parolees: Samson v. California Introduction Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Reaffirming Brady Obligations: Youngblood v. West Virginia and Its Implications on Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure Introduction Youngblood v. West Virginia, 547 U.S. 867 (2006), is a pivotal Supreme...
Defining Testimonial Statements under the Confrontation Clause: The Davis v. Washington Decision Introduction Davis v. Washington (547 U.S. 813, 2006) represents a significant development in the...
Rapanos v. United States: Redefining 'Waters of the United States' Under the Clean Water Act Introduction Rapanos v. United States (547 U.S. 715, 2006) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
KIRCHER v. PUTNAM FUNDS TRUST: Defining Appellate Boundaries under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Introduction Kircher et al. v. Putnam Funds Trust et al. (547 U.S. 633, 2006) is a...
Reimbursement Claims under FEHBA and the Limits of Federal Jurisdiction: Empire HealthChoice Assurance v. McVeigh Introduction The case of Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc., DBA Empire Blue Cross...
Exclusion of Workers' Compensation Premiums from Employee Benefit Plan Priority under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(5): Howard Delivery Service v. Zurich Introduction Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich...
Hudson v. Michigan: Reevaluating the Exclusionary Rule in Knock-and-Announce Violations Introduction Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
HOUSE v. BELL: Establishing the Actual Innocence Exception for Federal Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction HOUSE v. BELL, Warden, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Hill v. McDonough: Establishing §1983 as a Viable Avenue for Execution Method Challenges Introduction Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Zedner v. United States: Prospective Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights Introduction Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that addresses the...
Garcetti v. Ceballos: Defining First Amendment Protections for Public Employees' Official Speech Introduction Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States...