Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Protecting At-Will Employment Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass

Protecting At-Will Employment Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass

Date: Jan 29, 1999
Protecting At-Will Employment Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass Introduction The case of James H. Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass addresses significant issues concerning racial...
Exclusive Remedy under the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act Affirmed: Implications for Statutory Employers and Fellow Statutory Employees

Exclusive Remedy under the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act Affirmed: Implications for Statutory Employers and Fellow Statutory Employees

Date: Jan 29, 1999
Exclusive Remedy under the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act Affirmed: Implications for Statutory Employers and Fellow Statutory Employees Introduction In the appellate case of David Wayne Evans v....
United States v. Aramony and Merlo: Fourth Circuit Reinforces Proper Procedure in Sentencing Fines

United States v. Aramony and Merlo: Fourth Circuit Reinforces Proper Procedure in Sentencing Fines

Date: Jan 29, 1999
United States v. Aramony and Merlo: Fourth Circuit Reinforces Proper Procedure in Sentencing Fines Introduction In United States of America v. William Aramony and Thomas J. Merlo (166 F.3d 655, 4th...
Citizenship of Inactive Corporations for Diversity Jurisdiction: Athena Automotive v. DiGregorio

Citizenship of Inactive Corporations for Diversity Jurisdiction: Athena Automotive v. DiGregorio

Date: Jan 26, 1999
Citizenship of Inactive Corporations for Diversity Jurisdiction: Athena Automotive v. DiGregorio Introduction Athena Automotive, Incorporated v. John J. DiGregorio; J D Automotive, Incorporated, 166...
Hitachi Credit America v. Signet Bank: Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Fraud Claims and Interest Calculations in Contract Law

Hitachi Credit America v. Signet Bank: Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Fraud Claims and Interest Calculations in Contract Law

Date: Jan 20, 1999
Hitachi Credit America v. Signet Bank: Fourth Circuit Sets Precedent on Fraud Claims and Interest Calculations in Contract Law Introduction The case of Hitachi Credit America Corporation v. Signet...
Limitations on Personal Jurisdiction in Patent Infringement: Insights from ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, LLC

Limitations on Personal Jurisdiction in Patent Infringement: Insights from ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, LLC

Date: Jan 16, 1999
Limitations on Personal Jurisdiction in Patent Infringement: Insights from ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, LLC Introduction ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, LLC is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Danville v. Carter: Affirming Rigorous Standards for Municipal Liability under Section 1983

Danville v. Carter: Affirming Rigorous Standards for Municipal Liability under Section 1983

Date: Jan 15, 1999
Danville v. Carter: Affirming Rigorous Standards for Municipal Liability under Section 1983 Introduction In the case of Pamela Carter v. City of Danville et al. (164 F.3d 215), the United States...
Establishing District Court Jurisdiction Over Rule 60(b) Motions During Pending Appeals: Fobian and Green v. Storage Technology Corporation

Establishing District Court Jurisdiction Over Rule 60(b) Motions During Pending Appeals: Fobian and Green v. Storage Technology Corporation

Date: Jan 14, 1999
Establishing District Court Jurisdiction Over Rule 60(b) Motions During Pending Appeals: Fobian and Green v. Storage Technology Corporation Introduction The case of Fobian and Green v. Storage...
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Yeatts v. Angelone

Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Yeatts v. Angelone

Date: Jan 13, 1999
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Yeatts v. Angelone Introduction The case of Ronald Dale Yeatts v. Ronald J. Angelone, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Adoption of Preponderance of Evidence Standard for Amount in Controversy in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Adoption of Preponderance of Evidence Standard for Amount in Controversy in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Date: Jan 9, 1999
Adoption of Preponderance of Evidence Standard for Amount in Controversy in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases Introduction In the case of Charlotte Judy Sayre and Stewart Sayre v. Brian Potts and...
Assessing the Excessiveness of Jury Damage Awards: Insights from Konkel v. Bob Evans Farms Inc.

Assessing the Excessiveness of Jury Damage Awards: Insights from Konkel v. Bob Evans Farms Inc.

Date: Jan 5, 1999
Assessing the Excessiveness of Jury Damage Awards: Insights from Konkel v. Bob Evans Farms Inc. Introduction The case of Carol M. Konkel, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bob Evans Farms Incorporated,...
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Sexton v. French

Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Sexton v. French

Date: Dec 24, 1998
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Sexton v. French 1. Introduction The case of Michael Earl Sexton v. James B. French, Warden, Central Prison,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Causation and Individual Liability Under Title VII and ADEA

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Causation and Individual Liability Under Title VII and ADEA

Date: Dec 16, 1998
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Causation and Individual Liability Under Title VII and ADEA Introduction The case of James Causey v. Georger Balog et al....
Judicial Recusal and Impartiality: Insights from U.S. v. DeTemple

Judicial Recusal and Impartiality: Insights from U.S. v. DeTemple

Date: Dec 11, 1998
Judicial Recusal and Impartiality: Insights from United States of America v. DeTemple Introduction United States of America v. Gary L. DeTemple is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Enforcing Procedural Default: A Comprehensive Review of Fisher v. Angelone

Enforcing Procedural Default: A Comprehensive Review of Fisher v. Angelone

Date: Dec 10, 1998
Enforcing Procedural Default: A Comprehensive Review of Fisher v. Angelone Introduction Fisher v. Angelone is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on...
Comprehensive Commentary on Quesinberry v. Taylor: Procedural Default and Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Comprehensive Commentary on Quesinberry v. Taylor: Procedural Default and Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Dec 8, 1998
Procedural Default and Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: An Analysis of Quesinberry v. Taylor Introduction George Adrian Quesinberry, Jr. appealed his conviction and death...
Application of Qualified Immunity and Objective Reasonableness in Police Use of Deadly Force Cases: Sigman v. Town of Chapel Hill

Application of Qualified Immunity and Objective Reasonableness in Police Use of Deadly Force Cases: Sigman v. Town of Chapel Hill

Date: Dec 3, 1998
Application of Qualified Immunity and Objective Reasonableness in Police Use of Deadly Force Cases: Sigman v. Town of Chapel Hill Introduction The case of Gary Sigman et al. v. Town of Chapel Hill et...
Defining "Corrupt Intent" in Federal Bribery Laws: Insights from United States v. Larry E. Jennings, Sr.

Defining "Corrupt Intent" in Federal Bribery Laws: Insights from United States v. Larry E. Jennings, Sr.

Date: Nov 20, 1998
Defining "Corrupt Intent" in Federal Bribery Laws: Insights from United States v. Larry E. Jennings, Sr. Introduction United States v. Larry E. Jennings, Sr., 160 F.3d 1006 (4th Cir. 1998), is a...
Broad Interpretation of Pollution Exclusion in General Liability Policies: ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI v. KENNETH NEIL

Broad Interpretation of Pollution Exclusion in General Liability Policies: ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI v. KENNETH NEIL

Date: Nov 19, 1998
Broad Interpretation of Pollution Exclusion in General Liability Policies: Assicurazioni Generali, S.p.A. v. Kenneth Neil Introduction The case of Assicurazioni Generali, S.p.A., Plaintiff-Appellant,...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Reasonable Suspicion and Safety Concerns as Basis for Passenger Pat-Downs during Traffic Stops

Fourth Circuit Establishes Reasonable Suspicion and Safety Concerns as Basis for Passenger Pat-Downs during Traffic Stops

Date: Oct 31, 1998
Fourth Circuit Establishes Reasonable Suspicion and Safety Concerns as Basis for Passenger Pat-Downs during Traffic Stops Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Collins Kusi...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert