Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Learned Intermediary Doctrine and Standards for Punitive Damages in Manufacturer Liability: Toole v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Affirmation of Learned Intermediary Doctrine and Standards for Punitive Damages in Manufacturer Liability: Toole v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Date: Dec 15, 2000
Affirmation of Learned Intermediary Doctrine and Standards for Punitive Damages in Manufacturer Liability: Toole v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation Introduction Toole v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation,...
Eleventh Circuit Limits Corporate Intervention in Social Security Disability Hearings

Eleventh Circuit Limits Corporate Intervention in Social Security Disability Hearings

Date: Dec 15, 2000
Eleventh Circuit Limits Corporate Intervention in Social Security Disability Hearings Introduction In Crawford Company v. Apfel, 235 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2000), the United States Court of Appeals for...
TOUCHSTON v. McDERMOTT: Upholding Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Election Recount Litigation

TOUCHSTON v. McDERMOTT: Upholding Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Election Recount Litigation

Date: Dec 7, 2000
TOUCHSTON v. McDERMOTT: Upholding Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Election Recount Litigation Introduction TOUCHSTON v. McDERMOTT, 234 F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case arising...
Clarifying ADA Disability Standards: The Affirmation in Chanda v. Engelhard/ICC

Clarifying ADA Disability Standards: The Affirmation in Chanda v. Engelhard/ICC

Date: Dec 5, 2000
Clarifying ADA Disability Standards: The Affirmation in Chanda v. Engelhard/ICC Introduction Chanda v. Engelhard/ICC, 234 F.3d 1219 (11th Cir. 2000), addresses the nuanced interpretation of the...
Application of Strickland and Hitchcock Standards in Death Penalty Habeas Corpus: Bottoson v. Moore

Application of Strickland and Hitchcock Standards in Death Penalty Habeas Corpus: Bottoson v. Moore

Date: Nov 30, 2000
Application of Strickland and Hitchcock Standards in Death Penalty Habeas Corpus: Bottoson v. Moore Introduction Bottoson v. Moore is a significant appellate decision by the United States Court of...
Reevaluation of Supervisor Liability in Sexual Harassment: Johnson v. Booker T. Washington Broadcasting Service

Reevaluation of Supervisor Liability in Sexual Harassment: Johnson v. Booker T. Washington Broadcasting Service

Date: Nov 30, 2000
Reevaluation of Supervisor Liability in Sexual Harassment: Johnson v. Booker T. Washington Broadcasting Service Introduction In Dallas Johnson v. Booker T. Washington Broadcasting Service, Inc., the...
Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on RICO Claims and Non-Disclosure Under the Safety Act: No Mail or Wire Fraud

Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on RICO Claims and Non-Disclosure Under the Safety Act: No Mail or Wire Fraud

Date: Nov 30, 2000
Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on RICO Claims and Non-Disclosure Under the Safety Act: No Mail or Wire Fraud Introduction In the landmark case of Lisa M. Ayres et al. v. General Motors Corporation...
Davis v. Dually: Upholding Deliberate Indifference Standard for School District Liability under Title IX

Davis v. Dually: Upholding Deliberate Indifference Standard for School District Liability under Title IX

Date: Nov 25, 2000
Davis v. Dually: Upholding Deliberate Indifference Standard for School District Liability under Title IX Introduction Davis v. Dually, 233 F.3d 1367 (11th Cir. 2000), addresses a critical issue of...
Arbitration Agreements in Consumer Credit Do Not Violate ECOA: Insights from Bowen v. First Family Financial Services

Arbitration Agreements in Consumer Credit Do Not Violate ECOA: Insights from Bowen v. First Family Financial Services

Date: Nov 23, 2000
Arbitration Agreements in Consumer Credit Do Not Violate ECOA: Insights from Bowen v. First Family Financial Services Introduction In the landmark case of Ozie Bowen, on behalf of himself and all...
Clarifying EEOC Charge Filing Period: Eleventh Circuit's Ruling in Stewart v. Booker T. Washington Insurance

Clarifying EEOC Charge Filing Period: Eleventh Circuit's Ruling in Stewart v. Booker T. Washington Insurance

Date: Nov 10, 2000
Clarifying EEOC Charge Filing Period: Eleventh Circuit's Ruling in Stewart v. Booker T. Washington Insurance Introduction The case of Valda Stewart v. Booker T. Washington Insurance Company serves as...
Public Employer’s Authority Over Affirmative Action Reports and Employee Speech: Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Public Employer’s Authority Over Affirmative Action Reports and Employee Speech: Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Date: Nov 9, 2000
Public Employer’s Authority Over Affirmative Action Reports and Employee Speech: Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale Introduction In Deborah Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the...
Apprendi Principle Applied to Drug Quantity Sentencing under 21 U.S.C. §841: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 32-Year Sentence

Apprendi Principle Applied to Drug Quantity Sentencing under 21 U.S.C. §841: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 32-Year Sentence

Date: Nov 8, 2000
Apprendi Principle Applied to Drug Quantity Sentencing under 21 U.S.C. §841: Eleventh Circuit Affirms 32-Year Sentence Introduction The case of United States of America v. Renard Maurice Nealy,...
Affirmation of No Duty to Disclose in Federal Mail and Wire Fraud Claims: Langford v. Rite Aid

Affirmation of No Duty to Disclose in Federal Mail and Wire Fraud Claims: Langford v. Rite Aid

Date: Nov 3, 2000
Affirmation of No Duty to Disclose in Federal Mail and Wire Fraud Claims: Langford v. Rite Aid Introduction The case Barry P. Langford, individ. as representative of a class of similarly situated...
Defining Disability Under ADA: Brenda Cash v. Alabama Power Company, 231 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2000)

Defining Disability Under ADA: Brenda Cash v. Alabama Power Company, 231 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2000)

Date: Nov 2, 2000
Defining Disability Under ADA: Brenda Cash v. Alabama Power Company, 231 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2000) Introduction Brenda Cash v. Alabama Power Company is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Standards on Selective Prosecution Claims in Voter Fraud Case Smith v. Tyree

Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Standards on Selective Prosecution Claims in Voter Fraud Case Smith v. Tyree

Date: Oct 26, 2000
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Standards on Selective Prosecution Claims in Voter Fraud Case Smith v. Tyree Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Frank Smith and Connie Tyree...
Expanding Title VII Protections: Adverse Employment Actions Beyond State-Defined Demotions

Expanding Title VII Protections: Adverse Employment Actions Beyond State-Defined Demotions

Date: Oct 26, 2000
Expanding Title VII Protections: Adverse Employment Actions Beyond State-Defined Demotions Introduction The case of Kay Sessoms HINSON v. CLINCH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION addresses significant issues...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds FMLA Eligibility Criteria, Invalidates § 825.110(d) Regulation in Brungart v. BellSouth

Eleventh Circuit Upholds FMLA Eligibility Criteria, Invalidates § 825.110(d) Regulation in Brungart v. BellSouth

Date: Oct 25, 2000
Eleventh Circuit Upholds FMLA Eligibility Criteria, Invalidates § 825.110(d) Regulation in Brungart v. BellSouth Introduction The case of Robin Amaro Brungart v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc....
Reaffirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Investigatory Stops: U.S. v. Gordon and the Wardlow Precedent

Reaffirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Investigatory Stops: U.S. v. Gordon and the Wardlow Precedent

Date: Oct 24, 2000
Reaffirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Investigatory Stops: U.S. v. Gordon and the Wardlow Precedent Introduction The case of United States of America v. Darren Demeatrie Gordon (231 F.3d 750,...
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Qualified Immunity for Police Officials in Retaliation Claims

Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Qualified Immunity for Police Officials in Retaliation Claims

Date: Oct 17, 2000
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Qualified Immunity for Police Officials in Retaliation Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Valinda F. Oladeinde and Patricia L. Fields v. City of Birmingham,...
Substantive Due Process and Excessive Corporal Punishment in Schools: Neal v. Fulton County Board of Education

Substantive Due Process and Excessive Corporal Punishment in Schools: Neal v. Fulton County Board of Education

Date: Oct 7, 2000
Substantive Due Process and Excessive Corporal Punishment in Schools: Neal v. Fulton County Board of Education Introduction The case of Durante Neal v. Fulton County Board of Education, adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert