Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

sienkiewicz-v-greif-(uk)-ltd:-upholding-the-fairchild-barker-exception-and-rejecting-the-& Case Commentaries

Limiting Personal Mitigation and Clarifying Sentence Ranges in Historic Child-Sex Penetration Cases – Commentary on R v Anderson [2025] NICA 33

Limiting Personal Mitigation and Clarifying Sentence Ranges in Historic Child-Sex Penetration Cases – Commentary on R v Anderson [2025] NICA 33

Date: Jun 13, 2025
Limiting Personal Mitigation and Clarifying Sentence Ranges in Historic Child-Sex Penetration Cases – Commentary on R v Anderson [2025] NICA 33 Introduction The Northern Ireland Court of Appeal’s...
The Ryanair v. Skyscanner Discovery Precedent: Embedding Proportionality, Sampling, and Temporal Reach in High-Tech Competition Litigation

The Ryanair v. Skyscanner Discovery Precedent: Embedding Proportionality, Sampling, and Temporal Reach in High-Tech Competition Litigation

Date: Jun 12, 2025
The Ryanair v. Skyscanner Discovery Precedent: Embedding Proportionality, Sampling, and Temporal Reach in High-Tech Competition Litigation 1. Introduction The High Court’s judgment in Ryanair DAC v....
Pepper Finance v O’Reilly – The High Court Clarifies the Evidential Threshold and Discovery Limits in s.62(7) Possession Actions

Pepper Finance v O’Reilly – The High Court Clarifies the Evidential Threshold and Discovery Limits in s.62(7) Possession Actions

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Pepper Finance v O’Reilly – The High Court Clarifies the Evidential Threshold and Discovery Limits in s.62(7) Possession Actions 1. Introduction Pepper Finance Corporation (Ireland) DAC (“Pepper”)...
“Qualified Finality” — The Limited Reach of Res Judicata in Scottish Mental-Health Tribunal Appeals

“Qualified Finality” — The Limited Reach of Res Judicata in Scottish Mental-Health Tribunal Appeals

Date: Jun 12, 2025
“Qualified Finality” — The Limited Reach of Res Judicata in Scottish Mental-Health Tribunal Appeals 1. Introduction In Dr Agnes Louise Johnston v GA and another ([2025] CSIH 18) the Inner House of...
Atlantic Endeavour v OPW ([2025] IEHC 324): Contractual Duration as the Determinant for Lifting Automatic Suspensions under the 2017 Review Procedures Regulations

Atlantic Endeavour v OPW ([2025] IEHC 324): Contractual Duration as the Determinant for Lifting Automatic Suspensions under the 2017 Review Procedures Regulations

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Atlantic Endeavour Ltd & Anor v Office of Public Works ([2025] IEHC 324) “Contractual Duration as the Determinant for Lifting Automatic Suspensions” 1. Introduction This High Court decision,...
Promptness Prevails: Surrey CC v BC (2025) – Curtailing the “Continuing Duty” Doctrine and Reinforcing CPR 54.5 in Children-Act Judicial Reviews

Promptness Prevails: Surrey CC v BC (2025) – Curtailing the “Continuing Duty” Doctrine and Reinforcing CPR 54.5 in Children-Act Judicial Reviews

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Promptness Prevails: Surrey CC v BC (2025) – Curtailing the “Continuing Duty” Doctrine and Reinforcing CPR 54.5 in Children-Act Judicial Reviews 1. Introduction In Surrey County Council v BC ([2025]...

        “Injurious Affection” Re-Defined:  The Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Compensation
        under s.53 Electricity (Supply) Act 1927 – O’Reilly v. ESB  [2025] IESC 27

“Injurious Affection” Re-Defined: The Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Compensation under s.53 Electricity (Supply) Act 1927 – O’Reilly v. ESB [2025] IESC 27

Date: Jun 12, 2025
“Injurious Affection” Re-Defined: Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Compensation for Electricity Wayleaves in Ireland 1. Introduction On 5 June 2025 the Supreme Court delivered a landmark ruling...
“Reason to Believe” and Appellate Deference under CPR 6.9: A Commentary on Carr v Vehicle Control Services Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 713

“Reason to Believe” and Appellate Deference under CPR 6.9: A Commentary on Carr v Vehicle Control Services Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 713

Date: Jun 12, 2025
“Reason to Believe” and Appellate Deference under CPR 6.9: A Commentary on Carr v Vehicle Control Services Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 713 1. Introduction Carr v Vehicle Control Services Ltd (“Carr”)...
The “Limited-Weight & Rare-Prediction” Principle:  UKSC settles the role of foreign early-release regimes in Article 8 extradition proportionality tests

The “Limited-Weight & Rare-Prediction” Principle: UKSC settles the role of foreign early-release regimes in Article 8 extradition proportionality tests

Date: Jun 12, 2025
The “Limited-Weight & Rare-Prediction” Principle Andrysiewicz v Circuit Court in Łódź, Poland ([2025] UKSC 23) 1. Introduction The United Kingdom Supreme Court (“UKSC”) has delivered a landmark...
No Right of Recoupment under Section 151(8) After Policy Avoidance under Section 152(2)

No Right of Recoupment under Section 151(8) After Policy Avoidance under Section 152(2)

Date: Jun 12, 2025
No Right of Recoupment under Section 151(8) After Policy Avoidance under Section 152(2) Ian Whyte v David Arthur [2025] CSOH 47 1. Introduction Ian Whyte, a passenger injured in a 2017 road-traffic...
“Beyond Academic Judgment” – Court of Session Clarifies the SPSO’s Duty to Investigate University Maladministration and Systemic Discrimination

“Beyond Academic Judgment” – Court of Session Clarifies the SPSO’s Duty to Investigate University Maladministration and Systemic Discrimination

Date: Jun 12, 2025
“Beyond Academic Judgment” – Court of Session Clarifies the SPSO’s Duty to Investigate University Maladministration and Systemic Discrimination 1. Introduction AB v The Scottish Public Services...
R v Harrod [2024] EWCA Crim 819: Fresh Evidence, Alias Attribution, and Extensions of Time in EncroChat Conspiracy Appeals

R v Harrod [2024] EWCA Crim 819: Fresh Evidence, Alias Attribution, and Extensions of Time in EncroChat Conspiracy Appeals

Date: Jun 12, 2025
R v Harrod [2024] EWCA Crim 819: Fresh Evidence, Alias Attribution, and Extensions of Time in EncroChat Conspiracy Appeals Introduction This judgment from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)...
Harrod: The Court of Appeal Re-Defines “Fresh Evidence” and Tightens the Gate on Out-of-Time Criminal Appeals

Harrod: The Court of Appeal Re-Defines “Fresh Evidence” and Tightens the Gate on Out-of-Time Criminal Appeals

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Harrod: The Court of Appeal Re-Defines “Fresh Evidence” and Tightens the Gate on Out-of-Time Criminal Appeals Introduction Harrod, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 819) is a significant decision of the Court...
Temporal Limits of Article 2 ECHR Investigative Obligation Defined

Temporal Limits of Article 2 ECHR Investigative Obligation Defined

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Temporal Limits of Article 2 ECHR Investigative Obligation Defined: Exclusion of Legacy Inquests Beyond the Twelve-Year Threshold Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal in Northern...
Mandatory Statutory Variation Procedure for Specified Funding under Section 21 of the Infrastructure Act 2015

Mandatory Statutory Variation Procedure for Specified Funding under Section 21 of the Infrastructure Act 2015

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Mandatory Statutory Variation Procedure for Specified Funding under Section 21 of the Infrastructure Act 2015 Introduction Transport Action Network Ltd (“TAN”) challenged the Secretary of State for...
Andrew v FRN: Non-Party Appeal Rights and Procedural Fairness in Section 68 Arbitration Challenges

Andrew v FRN: Non-Party Appeal Rights and Procedural Fairness in Section 68 Arbitration Challenges

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Andrew v The Federal Republic of Nigeria: Non-Party Appeal Rights and Procedural Fairness in Section 68 Arbitration Challenges Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s judgment in...
Inherent Jurisdiction Revived: Court of Appeal Confirms Power to Re-open Confiscation Appeals Excluded from Crim PR 36.15

Inherent Jurisdiction Revived: Court of Appeal Confirms Power to Re-open Confiscation Appeals Excluded from Crim PR 36.15

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Inherent Jurisdiction Revived: Court of Appeal Confirms Power to Re-open Confiscation Appeals Excluded from Crim PR 36.15 1. Introduction Jacob (Formerly Oyebola), R. v (Re s.31 Proceeds of Crime Act...
Cheetham Sentencing Principles: Court of Appeal Clarifies Up-rating within Harassment Guideline Category B2 and the Limits of Totality Discounts

Cheetham Sentencing Principles: Court of Appeal Clarifies Up-rating within Harassment Guideline Category B2 and the Limits of Totality Discounts

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Cheetham Sentencing Principles: Court of Appeal Clarifies Up-rating within Harassment Guideline Category B2 and the Limits of Totality Discounts 1. Introduction Cheetham, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 804)...
Clarification of Guilty Plea Discounts Under Sentencing Guidelines in Complex Conspiracy Cases

Clarification of Guilty Plea Discounts Under Sentencing Guidelines in Complex Conspiracy Cases

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarification of Guilty Plea Discounts Under Sentencing Guidelines in Complex Conspiracy Cases Introduction This appeal arises from the joint sentencing of Jonathan Cassidy (“Cassidy”) and Nasar...
Objective Standard of Honesty in Section 172 Directors’ Duty Clarified by Saxon Woods v Costa

Objective Standard of Honesty in Section 172 Directors’ Duty Clarified by Saxon Woods v Costa

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Objective Standard of Honesty in Section 172 Directors’ Duty Clarified by Saxon Woods v Costa Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa (Re Spring Media...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert