Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

revocation-of-wills:-interpretation-and-evidentiary-standards-in-kench-andrews- Case Commentaries

Phones 4U v EE & Ors – The “Holistic Review” Standard for Delayed Judgments and Adverse-Inference Requests

Phones 4U v EE & Ors – The “Holistic Review” Standard for Delayed Judgments and Adverse-Inference Requests

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Phones 4U v EE & Others ([2025] EWCA Civ 869) The Court of Appeal’s “Holistic Review” Standard for Delayed Judgments and the Limits of Adverse-Inference Doctrine 1. Introduction This appeal arose...
“From Worldwide to Domestic” – Court of Appeal Clarifies Partial Continuation of Freezing Orders and the Priority of Non-Proprietary Assets for Legal Funding (Gable Insurance AG v Dewsall & Ors, [2025] EWCA Civ 884)

“From Worldwide to Domestic” – Court of Appeal Clarifies Partial Continuation of Freezing Orders and the Priority of Non-Proprietary Assets for Legal Funding (Gable Insurance AG v Dewsall & Ors, [2025] EWCA Civ 884)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“From Worldwide to Domestic” – Court of Appeal Clarifies Partial Continuation of Freezing Orders and the Priority of Non-Proprietary Assets for Legal Funding (Gable Insurance AG v Dewsall & Ors,...
No Care Order Without a Live s.31A Plan – Commentary on A & Ors (Care Orders at Home) [2025] EWCA Civ 901

No Care Order Without a Live s.31A Plan – Commentary on A & Ors (Care Orders at Home) [2025] EWCA Civ 901

Date: Jul 15, 2025
No Care Order Without a Live s.31A Plan Commentary on A & Ors (Care Orders at Home) [2025] EWCA Civ 901 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in A & Ors (Care Orders at Home) rewinds a...
Intra-Conspiracy Supplies Must Run Concurrently – A Commentary on Takawira & Williams v R
        [2025] EWCA Crim 1037

Intra-Conspiracy Supplies Must Run Concurrently – A Commentary on Takawira & Williams v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1037

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Intra-Conspiracy Supplies Must Run Concurrently – A Commentary on Takawira & Williams v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1037 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in Takawira & Williams v R has...
“Appropriate & Necessary”: The High Court’s Tailored-Disclosure Standard for Maintenance Variation Applications – Commentary on D.D v N.B.T. [2025] IEHC 402

“Appropriate & Necessary”: The High Court’s Tailored-Disclosure Standard for Maintenance Variation Applications – Commentary on D.D v N.B.T. [2025] IEHC 402

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“Appropriate & Necessary”: A Tailored-Disclosure Standard for Maintenance Variation Applications (Commentary on D.D v N.B.T. [2025] IEHC 402) 1. Introduction D.D v N.B.T. is a High Court (Family Law)...
Prosecution Appeals and the “Interests-of-Justice” Threshold After Jury Acquittal – Director of Public Prosecutions v JS [2025] IESC 32

Prosecution Appeals and the “Interests-of-Justice” Threshold After Jury Acquittal – Director of Public Prosecutions v JS [2025] IESC 32

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Prosecution Appeals and the “Interests-of-Justice” Threshold After Jury Acquittal – Director of Public Prosecutions v JS [2025] IESC 32 Introduction Case reference: The People (DPP) v JS, Supreme...
“Restocking Without Conviction” –  Wickford v Secretary of State [2025] EWCA Civ 882:  A Court of Appeal Blueprint for (i) Post-Prosecution Restocking Notices and (ii) When a Public-Law Error is Immaterial

“Restocking Without Conviction” – Wickford v Secretary of State [2025] EWCA Civ 882: A Court of Appeal Blueprint for (i) Post-Prosecution Restocking Notices and (ii) When a Public-Law Error is Immaterial

Date: Jul 11, 2025
“Restocking Without Conviction” – Wickford v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs [2025] EWCA Civ 882 Introduction The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Wickford Development Company...
The Charterhouse Clarification: “Reasonable Recipient” and Substantial-Compliance Tests in Tenancy-Deposit Prescribed Information

The Charterhouse Clarification: “Reasonable Recipient” and Substantial-Compliance Tests in Tenancy-Deposit Prescribed Information

Date: Jul 11, 2025
The Charterhouse Clarification: “Reasonable Recipient” and Substantial-Compliance Tests in Tenancy-Deposit Prescribed Information Introduction Lowe v Governors of Sutton’s Hospital in Charterhouse...
Actual Authority, Not Ostensible Authority: The Court of Appeal Re-Defines the Limits of Undisclosed Principal Liability under Letters of Indemnity

Actual Authority, Not Ostensible Authority: The Court of Appeal Re-Defines the Limits of Undisclosed Principal Liability under Letters of Indemnity

Date: Jul 11, 2025
Actual Authority, Not Ostensible Authority: The Court of Appeal Re-Defines the Limits of Undisclosed Principal Liability under Letters of Indemnity 1. Introduction In Berge Bulk Shipping PTE Ltd v...
Kidnap with Subsequent Intent to Rape: Court of Appeal Clarifies Sentencing Autonomy – Commentary on Yellambai & Ors (R v) [2025] EWCA Crim 1017

Kidnap with Subsequent Intent to Rape: Court of Appeal Clarifies Sentencing Autonomy – Commentary on Yellambai & Ors (R v) [2025] EWCA Crim 1017

Date: Jul 11, 2025
Kidnap with Subsequent Intent to Rape: Court of Appeal Clarifies Sentencing Autonomy Commentary on Yellambai & Ors (R v) [2025] EWCA Crim 1017 1. Introduction In R v Yellambai, Manchala & Doppalapudi...
Mitigation Wears Thin: Appellate Confirmation that Persistent Violent Recidivism Can Substantially Diminish Psychiatric Mitigation and Justify Higher/Consecutive Starting Points for Multi‑Victim Knife Threats — R v Docta [2025] EWCA Crim 1144

Mitigation Wears Thin: Appellate Confirmation that Persistent Violent Recidivism Can Substantially Diminish Psychiatric Mitigation and Justify Higher/Consecutive Starting Points for Multi‑Victim Knife Threats — R v Docta [2025] EWCA Crim 1144

Date: Jul 11, 2025
Mitigation Wears Thin: Appellate Confirmation that Persistent Violent Recidivism Can Substantially Diminish Psychiatric Mitigation and Justify Higher/Consecutive Starting Points for Multi‑Victim...
R v Brown [2025] EWCA Crim 1086 —  Applying the Totality Guideline to Historical Offences Where the Offender Has Already Served a Prolonged Post-Tariff Period under an Earlier Life Sentence

R v Brown [2025] EWCA Crim 1086 — Applying the Totality Guideline to Historical Offences Where the Offender Has Already Served a Prolonged Post-Tariff Period under an Earlier Life Sentence

Date: Jul 11, 2025
R v Brown [2025] EWCA Crim 1086 — Applying the Totality Guideline to Historical Offences Where the Offender Has Already Served a Prolonged Post-Tariff Period under an Earlier Life Sentence...
R v Yu [2025] EWCA Crim 1066: Foundation for Cross‑Examination on Third‑Party Digital Messages and the Prosecution’s Duty to Pursue Defence‑Flagged Inquiries

R v Yu [2025] EWCA Crim 1066: Foundation for Cross‑Examination on Third‑Party Digital Messages and the Prosecution’s Duty to Pursue Defence‑Flagged Inquiries

Date: Jul 11, 2025
R v Yu [2025] EWCA Crim 1066: Foundation for Cross‑Examination on Third‑Party Digital Messages and the Prosecution’s Duty to Pursue Defence‑Flagged Inquiries Introduction This commentary examines the...
Five-Year Inactivity Now “Almost Fatal”: High Court’s Post-Kirwan Clarification in Dennis Guilfoyle Developments Ltd v Wardrop [2025] IEHC 414

Five-Year Inactivity Now “Almost Fatal”: High Court’s Post-Kirwan Clarification in Dennis Guilfoyle Developments Ltd v Wardrop [2025] IEHC 414

Date: Jul 11, 2025
Five-Year Inactivity Now “Almost Fatal”: High Court’s Post-Kirwan Clarification in Dennis Guilfoyle Developments Ltd v Wardrop [2025] IEHC 414 1. Introduction The High Court (Barr J) in Dennis...
R v MAK [2025] EWCA Crim 1138: Fresh “evidence” from family opinion and pressured retractions held non-probative; ABE editing and social worker as appropriate adult endorsed; pre‑sentence recommendations not binding

R v MAK [2025] EWCA Crim 1138: Fresh “evidence” from family opinion and pressured retractions held non-probative; ABE editing and social worker as appropriate adult endorsed; pre‑sentence recommendations not binding

Date: Jul 11, 2025
R v MAK [2025] EWCA Crim 1138: Fresh “Evidence” from Family Opinion and Pressured Retractions Held Non‑Probative; ABE Editing and Social Worker as Appropriate Adult Endorsed; Pre‑Sentence...
Bench Technology and Procedural Fairness: The UV Decision on Judges’ Limited Use of Electronic Devices During Evidence

Bench Technology and Procedural Fairness: The UV Decision on Judges’ Limited Use of Electronic Devices During Evidence

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Bench Technology and Procedural Fairness: UV v Locality Reporter Manager & WX ([2025] CSIH 19) — A New Touchstone on Judicial In-Court Use of Electronic Devices 1. Introduction The Inner House of the...
“Apparent” Means Plainly Visible:  Ruby Properties (Scotland) Ltd v Watt and the Limits of Companies-House Disclosure

“Apparent” Means Plainly Visible: Ruby Properties (Scotland) Ltd v Watt and the Limits of Companies-House Disclosure

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Apparent” Means Plainly Visible: The New Threshold for General Disclosure in Share-Purchase Agreements Introduction In Ruby Properties (Scotland) Ltd (formerly ARB Aviation Ltd) v James Alistair...
Rocep-Lusol v Lindal Dispenser: Post-Expiry Patent Royalties and the Modern Approach to Contractual Construction

Rocep-Lusol v Lindal Dispenser: Post-Expiry Patent Royalties and the Modern Approach to Contractual Construction

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Rocep-Lusol v Lindal Dispenser: Post-Expiry Patent Royalties and the Modern Approach to Contractual Construction 1. Introduction Citation: Rocep-Lusol Holdings Ltd v Lindal Dispenser GmbH (First...
Enduring Mental Disorder and the Substitution of Hospital Orders for Legacy IPP Sentences: A Commentary on Osmond v R [2025] EWCA Crim 835

Enduring Mental Disorder and the Substitution of Hospital Orders for Legacy IPP Sentences: A Commentary on Osmond v R [2025] EWCA Crim 835

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Enduring Mental Disorder and the Substitution of Hospital Orders for Legacy IPP Sentences A Commentary on Osmond v R [2025] EWCA Crim 835 Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Osmond v R...
ANZ v R: Mandatory Means Inquiry & Restrictive Use of Compensation Orders in Criminal Sentencing

ANZ v R: Mandatory Means Inquiry & Restrictive Use of Compensation Orders in Criminal Sentencing

Date: Jul 10, 2025
ANZ v R: Mandatory Means Inquiry & Restrictive Use of Compensation Orders in Criminal Sentencing Introduction ANZ v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 778) is a Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) decision that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert