Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

material-prejudice-as-the-touchstone-of-procedural-fairness Case Commentaries

Structural Confidentiality of ECN Communications and Strict Necessity for Inspection: Commentary on Ryanair DAC v CCPC [2025] IEHC 644

Structural Confidentiality of ECN Communications and Strict Necessity for Inspection: Commentary on Ryanair DAC v CCPC [2025] IEHC 644

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Structural Confidentiality of ECN Communications and Strict Necessity for Inspection: Commentary on Ryanair DAC & Ryanair Holdings plc v CCPC (No. 3) [2025] IEHC 644 1. Introduction This judgment of...
Attesting a Codicil and the Witness–Beneficiary Rule: High Court Clarifies the Scope of Section 82 Succession Act 1965

Attesting a Codicil and the Witness–Beneficiary Rule: High Court Clarifies the Scope of Section 82 Succession Act 1965

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Attesting a Codicil and the Witness–Beneficiary Rule: High Court Clarifies the Scope of Section 82 Succession Act 1965 1. Introduction This commentary examines the decision of the High Court of...
Flexible Application of National Density Guidelines, “Accessible Locations” and Reasons in Split-Scheme Appeals – Commentary on AAI Baneshane Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála (No. II) [2025] IEHC 642

Flexible Application of National Density Guidelines, “Accessible Locations” and Reasons in Split-Scheme Appeals – Commentary on AAI Baneshane Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála (No. II) [2025] IEHC 642

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Flexible Application of National Density Guidelines, “Accessible Locations” and Reasons in Split-Scheme Appeals – Commentary on AAI Baneshane Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála (No. II) [2025] IEHC 642 1....
Each Phase Must Stand Alone: Project‑Splitting, “Accessible Locations” and Saving Conditions after AAI Baneshane Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 641

Each Phase Must Stand Alone: Project‑Splitting, “Accessible Locations” and Saving Conditions after AAI Baneshane Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 641

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Each Phase Must Stand Alone: Project‑Splitting, “Accessible Locations” and Saving Conditions after AAI Baneshane Ltd v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 641 1. Introduction This commentary examines...
“Additional Elements of Dependency”, Not Mere Support: IA & Ors v SSHD and the Re‑Drawing of Article 8 Family Life and Proportionality

“Additional Elements of Dependency”, Not Mere Support: IA & Ors v SSHD and the Re‑Drawing of Article 8 Family Life and Proportionality

Date: Nov 28, 2025
“Additional Elements of Dependency”, Not Mere Support: IA & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1516 1. Introduction IA & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department...
Fairmont Property Developers v Venus Bridging: Section 91 LPA 1925 Orders Displacing Mortgagees’ Conduct of Sale Confined to Exceptional Cases of Likely Undervalue

Fairmont Property Developers v Venus Bridging: Section 91 LPA 1925 Orders Displacing Mortgagees’ Conduct of Sale Confined to Exceptional Cases of Likely Undervalue

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Fairmont Property Developers v Venus Bridging: Section 91 LPA 1925 Orders Displacing Mortgagees’ Conduct of Sale Confined to Exceptional Cases of Likely Undervalue 1. Introduction The Court of...
When a Child Wants to Return: Child’s Wishes, Parental Suicide Risk and the Article 13(b) “Intolerable Situation” Defence in DM, Petition [2025] CSOH 109

When a Child Wants to Return: Child’s Wishes, Parental Suicide Risk and the Article 13(b) “Intolerable Situation” Defence in DM, Petition [2025] CSOH 109

Date: Nov 28, 2025
When a Child Wants to Return: Child’s Wishes, Parental Suicide Risk and the Article 13(b) “Intolerable Situation” Defence in DM, Petition [2025] CSOH 109 1. Introduction This Outer House decision of...
Reusing Expert Evidence and Retrospective Certification of Skilled Witnesses: Commentary on Spence v Graham [2025] CSOH 108

Reusing Expert Evidence and Retrospective Certification of Skilled Witnesses: Commentary on Spence v Graham [2025] CSOH 108

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Reusing Expert Evidence and Retrospective Certification of Skilled Witnesses: Commentary on Spence v Graham [2025] CSOH 108 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Opinion of Lord Braid in...
Will and Preferences First: HI and JK v LM [2025] IEHC 674 and the Appointment of Decision-Making Representatives under the 2015 Act

Will and Preferences First: HI and JK v LM [2025] IEHC 674 and the Appointment of Decision-Making Representatives under the 2015 Act

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Will and Preferences First: HI and JK v LM [2025] IEHC 674 and the Appointment of Decision-Making Representatives under the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 1. Introduction This...
Clarifying the Duty to Assess Innocent Mistake in Immigration Deception Findings: Commentary on AM (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] CSOH 107

Clarifying the Duty to Assess Innocent Mistake in Immigration Deception Findings: Commentary on AM (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] CSOH 107

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Clarifying the Duty to Assess Innocent Mistake in Immigration Deception Findings: Commentary on AM (AP) for Judicial Review [2025] CSOH 107 1. Introduction This judicial review in the Outer House of...
Corporate Standing and Discrimination by Association under the Equal Status Acts: Commentary on XTX Markets Technologies Ltd v Aviva Investors Liquidity Funds plc [2025] IEHC 651

Corporate Standing and Discrimination by Association under the Equal Status Acts: Commentary on XTX Markets Technologies Ltd v Aviva Investors Liquidity Funds plc [2025] IEHC 651

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Corporate Standing and Discrimination by Association under the Equal Status Acts: Commentary on XTX Markets Technologies Ltd v Aviva Investors Liquidity Funds plc [2025] IEHC 651 1. Introduction The...
R v Wood [2025] EWCA Crim 1656: Perception‑Response Time Evidence, Counsel’s Tactical Choices and Sentencing for Vehicle‑as‑Weapon Murders

R v Wood [2025] EWCA Crim 1656: Perception‑Response Time Evidence, Counsel’s Tactical Choices and Sentencing for Vehicle‑as‑Weapon Murders

Date: Nov 27, 2025
R v Wood [2025] EWCA Crim 1656: Perception‑Response Time Evidence, Counsel’s Tactical Choices and Sentencing for Vehicle‑as‑Weapon Murders 1. Introduction The decision of the Court of Appeal...
PIFSS v Al Rajaan & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1505: Joining Foreign Heirs as “Necessary or Proper Parties” for Enforcement-Only Relief

PIFSS v Al Rajaan & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1505: Joining Foreign Heirs as “Necessary or Proper Parties” for Enforcement-Only Relief

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Joining Foreign Heirs as “Necessary or Proper Parties” for Enforcement-Only Relief: Commentary on The Public Institution for Social Security v Al Rajaan & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1505 1. Introduction...
Grant v Metloc Systems Ltd [2025] NICA 60: The “Just and Equitable” Test for Extending Time in Northern Ireland Discrimination Claims

Grant v Metloc Systems Ltd [2025] NICA 60: The “Just and Equitable” Test for Extending Time in Northern Ireland Discrimination Claims

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Grant v Metloc Systems Ltd [2025] NICA 60: Clarifying the “Just and Equitable” Extension of Time Test in Northern Ireland Discrimination Claims 1. Introduction This Court of Appeal decision in Grant...
Structuring Multi‑Count Burglary Sentences, Totality, and Jurisdictional Errors: Commentary on R v Dymeter [2025] EWCA Crim 1586

Structuring Multi‑Count Burglary Sentences, Totality, and Jurisdictional Errors: Commentary on R v Dymeter [2025] EWCA Crim 1586

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Structuring Multi‑Count Burglary Sentences, Totality, and Jurisdictional Errors: Commentary on R v Dymeter [2025] EWCA Crim 1586 1. Introduction R v Dymeter [2025] EWCA Crim 1586 is a significant...
Conclusive Title of Registered Chargeholders and the Four‑Question Test for Summary Possession: Commentary on Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC v Walshe [2025] IEHC 661

Conclusive Title of Registered Chargeholders and the Four‑Question Test for Summary Possession: Commentary on Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC v Walshe [2025] IEHC 661

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Conclusive Title of Registered Chargeholders and the Four‑Question Test for Summary Possession: Commentary on Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC v Walshe [2025] IEHC 661 1. Introduction 1.1 Background...
R v Amini [2025] EWCA Crim 1621: Clarifying “Extreme” Harm, Abduction and Dangerousness in Rape Sentencing

R v Amini [2025] EWCA Crim 1621: Clarifying “Extreme” Harm, Abduction and Dangerousness in Rape Sentencing

Date: Nov 26, 2025
R v Amini [2025] EWCA Crim 1621: Clarifying “Extreme” Harm, Abduction and Dangerousness in Rape Sentencing 1. Introduction The decision in R v Amini [2025] EWCA Crim 1621 is an important Court of...
Buzzard‑Quashie v Northamptonshire Police: Contempt Sanctions for Chief Constables and the Non‑Optional Nature of Court Orders

Buzzard‑Quashie v Northamptonshire Police: Contempt Sanctions for Chief Constables and the Non‑Optional Nature of Court Orders

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Buzzard‑Quashie v Northamptonshire Police: Contempt Sanctions for Chief Constables and the Non‑Optional Nature of Court Orders 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s sanctions...
Mitchell v Al Jaber (No 2): Fiduciary Liability of Post‑Liquidation “Intermeddler” Directors, Unpaid Vendor’s Liens and Equitable Compensation

Mitchell v Al Jaber (No 2): Fiduciary Liability of Post‑Liquidation “Intermeddler” Directors, Unpaid Vendor’s Liens and Equitable Compensation

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Mitchell & Anor v Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber (No 2) [2025] UKSC 43: Fiduciary Liability of Post‑Liquidation “Intermeddler” Directors, Unpaid Vendor’s Liens and Equitable Compensation 1....
Braganza Duties, Lay Representation and Winding‑Up Petitions in Scots Law: Commentary on Innovate UK Loans Ltd v Wootzano Ltd [2025] CSOH 106

Braganza Duties, Lay Representation and Winding‑Up Petitions in Scots Law: Commentary on Innovate UK Loans Ltd v Wootzano Ltd [2025] CSOH 106

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Braganza Duties, Lay Representation and Winding‑Up Petitions in Scots Law: Commentary on Innovate UK Loans Ltd v Wootzano Ltd [2025] CSOH 106 1. Introduction This commentary examines the opinion of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert