Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

defining-& Case Commentaries

Preserving the Status Quo Pending FOO Hearing: Adequacy of Damages in Interim Injunctions in AstraZeneca AB & Anor v Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd

Preserving the Status Quo Pending FOO Hearing: Adequacy of Damages in Interim Injunctions in AstraZeneca AB & Anor v Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Preserving the Status Quo Pending FOO Hearing: Adequacy of Damages in Interim Injunctions in AstraZeneca AB & Anor v Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd 1. Introduction AstraZeneca AB & Anor...
Clarifying “Necessarily” in Conspiracy to Cause Public Nuisance: Maxey & Anor v R [2025] EWCA Crim 472

Clarifying “Necessarily” in Conspiracy to Cause Public Nuisance: Maxey & Anor v R [2025] EWCA Crim 472

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Clarifying “Necessarily” in Conspiracy to Cause Public Nuisance: Maxey & Anor v R [2025] EWCA Crim 472 Introduction In Maxey & Anor v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 472), the England and Wales Court of Appeal...
Quantifying Material Increase in Mesothelioma Risk: Direct Risk Assessment in Johnstone v Fawcett’s Garage

Quantifying Material Increase in Mesothelioma Risk: Direct Risk Assessment in Johnstone v Fawcett’s Garage

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Quantifying Material Increase in Mesothelioma Risk: Direct Risk Assessment in Johnstone v Fawcett’s Garage 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Johnstone v Fawcett’s Garage (Newbury) Ltd...
Disapplication of Bright-Line “Relevant Person” Status in Children’s Hearings to Protect Article 8 Rights

Disapplication of Bright-Line “Relevant Person” Status in Children’s Hearings to Protect Article 8 Rights

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Disapplication of Bright-Line “Relevant Person” Status in Children’s Hearings to Protect Article 8 Rights 1. Introduction This commentary discusses the Inner House decision in Reclaiming Motion by A...
R v Mingo & Neale: The Court of Appeal Affirms Flexible Jury Directions on the “Sure / 100 % Certainty” Dichotomy

R v Mingo & Neale: The Court of Appeal Affirms Flexible Jury Directions on the “Sure / 100 % Certainty” Dichotomy

Date: Apr 16, 2025
R v Mingo & Neale: The Court of Appeal Affirms Flexible Jury Directions on the “Sure / 100 % Certainty” Dichotomy Introduction The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in Mingo & Anor, R. v ([2025]...
Post-Offence Conduct as a Mitigation-Nullifier – A Commentary on R v Ali [2025] EWCA Crim 870

Post-Offence Conduct as a Mitigation-Nullifier – A Commentary on R v Ali [2025] EWCA Crim 870

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Post-Offence Conduct as a Mitigation-Nullifier – A Commentary on R v Ali [2025] EWCA Crim 870 Introduction R v Ali [2025] EWCA Crim 870 is a reference by the Solicitor General under s.36 Criminal...
R v BPK (2025): Clarifying the Singular “Starting Point” in Sentencing Guidelines and the Need to Recognise Separate Criminality

R v BPK (2025): Clarifying the Singular “Starting Point” in Sentencing Guidelines and the Need to Recognise Separate Criminality

Date: Apr 16, 2025
R v BPK (2025): Clarifying the Singular “Starting Point” in Sentencing Guidelines and the Need to Recognise Separate Criminality Introduction In R v BPK ([2025] EWCA Crim 711) the Court of Appeal...
Clarifying Youth Sentencing and the Principle of Totality: R v Cunningham [2025] EWCA Crim 513

Clarifying Youth Sentencing and the Principle of Totality: R v Cunningham [2025] EWCA Crim 513

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Clarifying Youth Sentencing and the Principle of Totality: R v Cunningham [2025] EWCA Crim 513 1. Introduction R v Cunningham ([2025] EWCA Crim 513) is a decision of the England and Wales Court of...
Clarifying the Requirement for Dangerousness Findings under Section 280 of the Sentencing Act 2020

Clarifying the Requirement for Dangerousness Findings under Section 280 of the Sentencing Act 2020

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Clarifying the Requirement for Dangerousness Findings under Section 280 of the Sentencing Act 2020 Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Fowler [2025] EWCA Crim...
Fairness and Benefit Allocation in Interim Restructuring Plans under Part 26A: Kington SARL v Thames Water

Fairness and Benefit Allocation in Interim Restructuring Plans under Part 26A: Kington SARL v Thames Water

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Fairness and Benefit Allocation in Interim Restructuring Plans under Part 26A: Kington SARL v Thames Water Introduction In Kington SARL & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd & Anor ([2025] EWCA...
Primacy of Expert Medical Timing Evidence in Child Care Fact-Finding: O (Children: Fact-Finding) [2025] EWCA Civ 479

Primacy of Expert Medical Timing Evidence in Child Care Fact-Finding: O (Children: Fact-Finding) [2025] EWCA Civ 479

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Primacy of Expert Medical Timing Evidence in Child Care Fact-Finding: O (Children: Fact-Finding) [2025] EWCA Civ 479 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s April 2025 decision...
“Jurisdictional Rigour under s.58 CJA 2003” – Commentary on AWY, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 754

“Jurisdictional Rigour under s.58 CJA 2003” – Commentary on AWY, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 754

Date: Apr 16, 2025
“Jurisdictional Rigour under s.58 Criminal Justice Act 2003” Commentary on AWY, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 754) 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in R. v AWY crystallises, once again, the...
Obligation to Provide Public Open Space or Financial Contribution in Lieu: Eglington Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála ([2025] IEHC 209)

Obligation to Provide Public Open Space or Financial Contribution in Lieu: Eglington Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála ([2025] IEHC 209)

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Obligation to Provide Public Open Space or Financial Contribution in Lieu in Planning Appeals Introduction Eglington Residents Association & Anor v An Bord Pleanála & Ors ([2025] IEHC 209) was...

        Sumner v R – Clarifying the Post-Barnes Formula for Driving Disqualification
        Where Pre-28 June 2022 Dangerous-Driving Offences Attract Prison Sentences
        of Seven Years or More

Sumner v R – Clarifying the Post-Barnes Formula for Driving Disqualification Where Pre-28 June 2022 Dangerous-Driving Offences Attract Prison Sentences of Seven Years or More

Date: Apr 16, 2025
Sumner v R – Clarifying the Post-Barnes Formula for Driving Disqualification Where Pre-28 June 2022 Dangerous-Driving Offences Attract Prison Sentences of Seven Years or More Introduction In Sumner,...
Clarifying “That Capacity”: Scope of Deemed Transfer Notices in Company Articles

Clarifying “That Capacity”: Scope of Deemed Transfer Notices in Company Articles

Date: Apr 15, 2025
Clarifying “That Capacity”: Scope of Deemed Transfer Notices in Company Articles 1. Introduction Syspal Capital Ltd v Truman & Anor ([2025] EWCA Civ 469) concerns the interpretation of a pre-emption...
The “Beckett Rule”: Mandatory Compliance with Core-Bundle Directions in the Court of Appeal

The “Beckett Rule”: Mandatory Compliance with Core-Bundle Directions in the Court of Appeal

Date: Apr 15, 2025
The “Beckett Rule”: Mandatory Compliance with Core-Bundle Directions in the Court of Appeal 1. Introduction Beckett v Criminal Cases Review Commission ([2025] EWCA Civ 1067) concerns an application...
Fair and Equitable Costs Allocation in Modularized Environmental Proceedings: Doyle & Ors v An Bord Pleanála [No.2]

Fair and Equitable Costs Allocation in Modularized Environmental Proceedings: Doyle & Ors v An Bord Pleanála [No.2]

Date: Apr 12, 2025
Fair and Equitable Costs Allocation in Modularized Environmental Proceedings: Doyle & Ors v An Bord Pleanála [No.2] Introduction The High Court’s decision in Doyle & Ors v An Bord Pleanála & Ors...
Strict Interpretation of Article 8(1) Brussels I (recast): Limits on Non-Anchor Defendants’ Jurisdiction

Strict Interpretation of Article 8(1) Brussels I (recast): Limits on Non-Anchor Defendants’ Jurisdiction

Date: Apr 12, 2025
Strict Interpretation of Article 8(1) Brussels I (recast): Limits on Non-Anchor Defendants’ Jurisdiction Introduction In the composite decision Yasar, Talibov & Senen v CCC Essen Digital GmbH & Anor;...
The Discretionary Rejection Principle under Immigration Rules Appendix SW 1.6

The Discretionary Rejection Principle under Immigration Rules Appendix SW 1.6

Date: Apr 12, 2025
The Discretionary Rejection Principle under Immigration Rules Appendix SW 1.6 Introduction Islam, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 458 concerned...
The Principle of Jury Direction in Specimen Counts: Single Occasion vs Multiple Occurrences Established in R v AWG [2025] EWCA Crim 564

The Principle of Jury Direction in Specimen Counts: Single Occasion vs Multiple Occurrences Established in R v AWG [2025] EWCA Crim 564

Date: Apr 12, 2025
The Principle of Jury Direction in Specimen Counts: Single Occasion vs Multiple Occurrences Established in R v AWG [2025] EWCA Crim 564 Introduction In R v AWG [2025] EWCA Crim 564, the Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert