Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

admissibility-of-extrinsic-evidence-in-will-interpretation:-o& Case Commentaries

Primitive Access Tracks Are Not “Roads” for EIA Purposes: Definitional Alignment with the EIA Directive and Pleading Discipline in Cummins & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 521

Primitive Access Tracks Are Not “Roads” for EIA Purposes: Definitional Alignment with the EIA Directive and Pleading Discipline in Cummins & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 521

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Primitive Access Tracks Are Not “Roads” for EIA Purposes: Definitional Alignment with the EIA Directive and Pleading Discipline in Cummins & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 521 Introduction...
“Phasing Means Provision”: High Court holds that Local Area Plan phasing must be applied as written; “spirit and intent” and conditions cannot replace section 37(2)(b) where a material contravention arises

“Phasing Means Provision”: High Court holds that Local Area Plan phasing must be applied as written; “spirit and intent” and conditions cannot replace section 37(2)(b) where a material contravention arises

Date: Oct 4, 2025
“Phasing Means Provision”: High Court holds that Local Area Plan phasing must be applied as written; “spirit and intent” and conditions cannot replace section 37(2)(b) where a material contravention...
Civil Service Probation: Primacy of the Appropriate Authority and the “Factually Sustainable Satisfaction” Test – Mosepele v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 535

Civil Service Probation: Primacy of the Appropriate Authority and the “Factually Sustainable Satisfaction” Test – Mosepele v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 535

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Civil Service Probation: Primacy of the Appropriate Authority and the “Factually Sustainable Satisfaction” Test – Mosepele v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 535 Introduction This High Court judgment...
No Extension, No Leave: Formal, Affidavit‑Grounded Extension of Time as a Pre‑condition to Judicial Review; and an Arguable Jurisdictional Defect Where a Summons Omits the District Court Clerk’s Name

No Extension, No Leave: Formal, Affidavit‑Grounded Extension of Time as a Pre‑condition to Judicial Review; and an Arguable Jurisdictional Defect Where a Summons Omits the District Court Clerk’s Name

Date: Oct 4, 2025
No Extension, No Leave: Formal, Affidavit‑Grounded Extension of Time as a Pre‑condition to Judicial Review; and an Arguable Jurisdictional Defect Where a Summons Omits the District Court Clerk’s Name...
No Injunction After the Hammer Falls and Strict Re‑Pleading of Defective Counterclaims: Clarifying s.52 LCLRA and Order 21 Rule 9 in McCarthy v Byrne [2025] IEHC 519

No Injunction After the Hammer Falls and Strict Re‑Pleading of Defective Counterclaims: Clarifying s.52 LCLRA and Order 21 Rule 9 in McCarthy v Byrne [2025] IEHC 519

Date: Oct 3, 2025
No Injunction After the Hammer Falls and Strict Re‑Pleading of Defective Counterclaims: Clarifying s.52 LCLRA and Order 21 Rule 9 in McCarthy v Byrne [2025] IEHC 519 Introduction This High Court...
Affirmation Keeps All Obligations Alive: Cumulative Delivery and Net Availability under EXW Instalment Sales — Commentary on Advanced Multi‑Technology (t/a Hitex) & Ors v Uniserve Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1212

Affirmation Keeps All Obligations Alive: Cumulative Delivery and Net Availability under EXW Instalment Sales — Commentary on Advanced Multi‑Technology (t/a Hitex) & Ors v Uniserve Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1212

Date: Oct 3, 2025
Affirmation Keeps All Obligations Alive: Cumulative Delivery and Net Availability under EXW Instalment Sales Commentary on Advanced Multi-Technology for Medical Industry (t/a Hitex) & Ors v Uniserve...
Foreign non-recognition is a welfare factor, not a bar: Inner House clarifies UNCRC Article 21 and adopts Re N in Scottish adoption law

Foreign non-recognition is a welfare factor, not a bar: Inner House clarifies UNCRC Article 21 and adopts Re N in Scottish adoption law

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Foreign non-recognition is a welfare factor, not a bar: Inner House clarifies UNCRC Article 21 and adopts Re N in Scottish adoption law Introduction This commentary examines the Scottish Court of...
No Mitigation Without Nexus: Fresh Psychiatric Evidence on CCRC Reference must Demonstrably Link to the Offending (R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208)

No Mitigation Without Nexus: Fresh Psychiatric Evidence on CCRC Reference must Demonstrably Link to the Offending (R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Mitigation Without Nexus: Fresh Psychiatric Evidence on CCRC Reference must Demonstrably Link to the Offending (R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208) Introduction In R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208,...
No Agency Signature under s.53(1)(b): Corporate Execution Required, and Non‑Compliant Self‑Declared Trusts Cannot Defeat s.423 Transactions-at-Undervalue

No Agency Signature under s.53(1)(b): Corporate Execution Required, and Non‑Compliant Self‑Declared Trusts Cannot Defeat s.423 Transactions-at-Undervalue

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Agency Signature under s.53(1)(b): Corporate Execution Required, and Non‑Compliant Self‑Declared Trusts Cannot Defeat s.423 Transactions-at-Undervalue Introduction In National Iranian Oil Company...
Safeguarding Over Preference in Child Relocation: Abuse Risk and the Feasibility of Ongoing Maternal Involvement Trump Unanimous Child Wishes; Novel “CAMS” Evidence Excluded — PSC v NS [2025] CSOH 90

Safeguarding Over Preference in Child Relocation: Abuse Risk and the Feasibility of Ongoing Maternal Involvement Trump Unanimous Child Wishes; Novel “CAMS” Evidence Excluded — PSC v NS [2025] CSOH 90

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Safeguarding Over Preference in Child Relocation: Abuse Risk and the Feasibility of Ongoing Maternal Involvement Trump Unanimous Child Wishes; Novel “CAMS” Evidence Excluded — PSC v NS [2025] CSOH 90...
From “As Short-Lived as Possible” to “Reasonable Time”: NICA sets the test for Article 8 delay in asylum decisions and re‑states the Salem filter

From “As Short-Lived as Possible” to “Reasonable Time”: NICA sets the test for Article 8 delay in asylum decisions and re‑states the Salem filter

Date: Oct 1, 2025
From “As Short-Lived as Possible” to “Reasonable Time”: NICA sets the test for Article 8 delay in asylum decisions and re‑states the Salem filter Introduction This commentary analyses the Court of...

      Country Guidance on Protection Risk Does Not Preclude Article 8 “Very Significant Obstacles” Claims: Quashing of Section 94 Certification in SV [2025] CSOH 88

Country Guidance on Protection Risk Does Not Preclude Article 8 “Very Significant Obstacles” Claims: Quashing of Section 94 Certification in SV [2025] CSOH 88

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Country Guidance on Protection Risk Does Not Preclude Article 8 “Very Significant Obstacles” Claims: Quashing of Section 94 Certification in SV [2025] CSOH 88 Introduction This commentary examines...
“Reconsideration” under the NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009: Limited Remit, Conditional Admission of New Evidence, and Successor Contractors’ Standing to Appeal

“Reconsideration” under the NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009: Limited Remit, Conditional Admission of New Evidence, and Successor Contractors’ Standing to Appeal

Date: Sep 30, 2025
“Reconsideration” under the NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009: Limited Remit, Conditional Admission of New Evidence, and Successor Contractors’ Standing to Appeal Case...
No Bare Declarators of Age and No Enforceable Right to Accommodation under s25(3): Clarifying Age‑Assessment Litigation in Scotland

No Bare Declarators of Age and No Enforceable Right to Accommodation under s25(3): Clarifying Age‑Assessment Litigation in Scotland

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Bare Declarators of Age and No Enforceable Right to Accommodation under s25(3): Clarifying Age‑Assessment Litigation in Scotland Introduction In AN v Renfrewshire Council and others [2025] CSOH...
Vedanta Resources v Commissioner of Valuation [2025] IEHC 511: The High Court mandates an explicit, reasoned choice of valuation methodology—especially the contractor’s method—for specialised, post-closure facilities

Vedanta Resources v Commissioner of Valuation [2025] IEHC 511: The High Court mandates an explicit, reasoned choice of valuation methodology—especially the contractor’s method—for specialised, post-closure facilities

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Vedanta Resources v Commissioner of Valuation [2025] IEHC 511: The High Court mandates an explicit, reasoned choice of valuation methodology—especially the contractor’s method—for specialised,...
S v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 513: Trial-Court Primacy and the “Real Possibility” Threshold in Delay-Based Prohibition Applications Involving a Deceased Witness

S v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 513: Trial-Court Primacy and the “Real Possibility” Threshold in Delay-Based Prohibition Applications Involving a Deceased Witness

Date: Sep 30, 2025
S v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 513: Trial-Court Primacy and the “Real Possibility” Threshold in Delay-Based Prohibition Applications Involving a Deceased Witness Introduction This...
O’Rourke v Minister for Defence & Ors [2025] IEHC 518: A Procedural Framework for Court‑Ordered Use of Redacted Protected Disclosure Materials under s.16(2) of the 2014 Act

O’Rourke v Minister for Defence & Ors [2025] IEHC 518: A Procedural Framework for Court‑Ordered Use of Redacted Protected Disclosure Materials under s.16(2) of the 2014 Act

Date: Sep 30, 2025
A Procedural Framework for Court‑Ordered Use of Redacted Protected Disclosure Materials under s.16(2) of the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 (as amended) Introduction This High Court judgment...
Baniulyte v R: No Routine Anonymity for Adult Trafficking Victims in Criminal Appeals; Convictions Unsafe Where s45 MSA Defence Was Not Put Despite Clear Indicators

Baniulyte v R: No Routine Anonymity for Adult Trafficking Victims in Criminal Appeals; Convictions Unsafe Where s45 MSA Defence Was Not Put Despite Clear Indicators

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Baniulyte v R: No Routine Anonymity for Adult Trafficking Victims in Criminal Appeals; Convictions Unsafe Where s45 MSA Defence Was Not Put Despite Clear Indicators Introduction In Baniulyte v R...
“No Illusory Solvency”: Post‑Arrangement Sustainability and Unfair Prejudice under s.115A — Maloney & Anor [2025] IEHC 516

“No Illusory Solvency”: Post‑Arrangement Sustainability and Unfair Prejudice under s.115A — Maloney & Anor [2025] IEHC 516

Date: Sep 30, 2025
“No Illusory Solvency”: Post‑Arrangement Sustainability and Unfair Prejudice under s.115A — Maloney & Anor [2025] IEHC 516 Court: High Court of Ireland (Owens J) | Citation: [2025] IEHC 516 | Date:...
Kapp: Section 117B public‑interest factors apply to revocation of deportation orders, requiring a forward‑looking assessment of financial independence

Kapp: Section 117B public‑interest factors apply to revocation of deportation orders, requiring a forward‑looking assessment of financial independence

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Kapp: Section 117B public‑interest factors apply to revocation of deportation orders, requiring a forward‑looking assessment of financial independence Introduction In Secretary of State for the Home...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert