Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Preservation of Jurisdiction in Repealed Statutes: National Planners, Ltd. v. Contributories

Preservation of Jurisdiction in Repealed Statutes: National Planners, Ltd. v. Contributories

Date: Nov 21, 1957
Preservation of Jurisdiction in Repealed Statutes: National Planners, Ltd. v. Contributories Introduction National Planners, Ltd. v. Contributories is a landmark judgment delivered by the Punjab &...
Recognition of Implicit Insurance Claims During Civil Disturbances: Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd.

Recognition of Implicit Insurance Claims During Civil Disturbances: Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd.

Date: Nov 15, 1957
Recognition of Implicit Insurance Claims During Civil Disturbances: Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath v. Hartford Fire Insurance...
Clarifying Possession Restitution Under Section 151 CPC: Kaku Singh v. Gobind Singh

Clarifying Possession Restitution Under Section 151 CPC: Kaku Singh v. Gobind Singh

Date: Nov 6, 1957
Clarifying Possession Restitution Under Section 151 CPC: Kaku Singh v. Gobind Singh Introduction The case of Kaku Singh v. Gobind Singh And Others, adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on...
Kesar Devi v. Nanak Singh: High Court Validates Urban Pre-emption Rights While Limiting Contiguity Clauses under Article 19(1)(f)

Kesar Devi v. Nanak Singh: High Court Validates Urban Pre-emption Rights While Limiting Contiguity Clauses under Article 19(1)(f)

Date: Oct 30, 1957
Kesar Devi v. Nanak Singh: High Court Validates Urban Pre-emption Rights While Limiting Contiguity Clauses under Article 19(1)(f) Introduction The case of Kesar Devi v. Nanak Singh adjudicated by the...
Compliance of Municipal Executives with Judicial Injunctions: Upholding the Sanctity of Court Orders

Compliance of Municipal Executives with Judicial Injunctions: Upholding the Sanctity of Court Orders

Date: Oct 26, 1957
Compliance of Municipal Executives with Judicial Injunctions: Upholding the Sanctity of Court Orders Introduction The case of Narain Singh v. S. Hardyal Singh Harika adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Karnal Distillery Company v. Ladli Parshad Jaiswal: A Landmark Judgment on Corporate Governance and Undue Influence

Karnal Distillery Company v. Ladli Parshad Jaiswal: A Landmark Judgment on Corporate Governance and Undue Influence

Date: Oct 19, 1957
Karnal Distillery Company v. Ladli Parshad Jaiswal: A Landmark Judgment on Corporate Governance and Undue Influence Introduction Karnal Distillery Company Ltd. v. Ladli Parshad Jaiswal is a pivotal...
Determining Limitation Period for Section 144 Applications under the Civil Procedure Code: Insights from Mela Ram v. Dharam Chand

Determining Limitation Period for Section 144 Applications under the Civil Procedure Code: Insights from Mela Ram v. Dharam Chand

Date: Oct 17, 1957
Determining Limitation Period for Section 144 Applications under the Civil Procedure Code: Insights from Mela Ram v. Dharam Chand Introduction The case of Mela Ram And Others v. Dharam Chand,...
Inclusion of Musical Instrument Manufacturing under Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952

Inclusion of Musical Instrument Manufacturing under Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952

Date: Oct 15, 1957
Inclusion of Musical Instrument Manufacturing under Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 Introduction The case of Haji Nadir Ali Khan And Others v. The Union Of India And Others was adjudicated by...
Full Redemption Required for Subrogation and Applicability of Lis Pendens in Mortgage Suits: Simla Banking v. Firm Luddar Mal Khushi Ram

Full Redemption Required for Subrogation and Applicability of Lis Pendens in Mortgage Suits: Simla Banking v. Firm Luddar Mal Khushi Ram

Date: Sep 28, 1957
Full Redemption Required for Subrogation and Applicability of Lis Pendens in Mortgage Suits Introduction The case of Simla Banking And Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Firm Luddar Mal Khushi Ram was...
Validity of Karta’s Gifts to Spouse Without Coparcener Consent in Hindu Undivided Families

Validity of Karta’s Gifts to Spouse Without Coparcener Consent in Hindu Undivided Families

Date: Sep 25, 1957
Validity of Karta’s Gifts to Spouse Without Coparcener Consent in Hindu Undivided Families 1. Introduction The case of S. Raghbir Singh Sandhawalia v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the...
Clarification on Jurisdiction under the Indian Arbitration Act: Emphasizing Subject-Matter Over Territorial Factors

Clarification on Jurisdiction under the Indian Arbitration Act: Emphasizing Subject-Matter Over Territorial Factors

Date: Sep 17, 1957
Clarification on Jurisdiction under the Indian Arbitration Act: Emphasizing Subject-Matter Over Territorial Factors Introduction The case of Inder Chand Jain, Petitioner v. Pooran Chand-Bansi Dhar...
Government Premises (Eviction) Act 1950 Declared Ultra Vires under Article 19(1)(f) in Satish Chander v. Delhi Improvement Trust

Government Premises (Eviction) Act 1950 Declared Ultra Vires under Article 19(1)(f) in Satish Chander v. Delhi Improvement Trust

Date: Sep 6, 1957
Government Premises (Eviction) Act 1950 Declared Ultra Vires under Article 19(1)(f) in Satish Chander And Anr. v. Delhi Improvement Trust Introduction The case of Satish Chander And Anr. v. Delhi...
Section 173 CrPC Governs Investigations Involving Both Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offenses: Shri Ram Krishana Dalmia v. State

Section 173 CrPC Governs Investigations Involving Both Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offenses: Shri Ram Krishana Dalmia v. State

Date: Aug 28, 1957
Section 173 CrPC Governs Investigations Involving Both Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offenses: Shri Ram Krishana Dalmia v. State Introduction The case of Shri Ram Krishana Dalmia v. State was...
Limits of Court's Inherent Powers in Refunding Court-Fees: Analysis of Jawahar Singh v. Union of India

Limits of Court's Inherent Powers in Refunding Court-Fees: Analysis of Jawahar Singh v. Union of India

Date: Aug 15, 1957
Limits of Court's Inherent Powers in Refunding Court-Fees: Analysis of Jawahar Singh v. Union of India Introduction Jawahar Singh v. Union of India is a seminal judgment delivered by the Punjab &...
Rao Harnarain Singh v. The State (1957): Enhanced Standards for Consent in Rape Cases and Bail Considerations

Rao Harnarain Singh v. The State (1957): Enhanced Standards for Consent in Rape Cases and Bail Considerations

Date: Aug 13, 1957
Rao Harnarain Singh v. The State (1957): Enhanced Standards for Consent in Rape Cases and Bail Considerations Introduction The case of Rao Harnarain Singh Sheoji Singh And Others v. The State was...
Ensuring Procedural Compliance in Possession Disputes: Insights from Sri Ram v. The State

Ensuring Procedural Compliance in Possession Disputes: Insights from Sri Ram v. The State

Date: Jun 28, 1957
Ensuring Procedural Compliance in Possession Disputes: Insights from Sri Ram v. The State Introduction Sri Ram and Others v. The State and Others is a landmark judgment delivered by the Punjab &...
Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 337 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: A Comprehensive Analysis

Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 337 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jun 26, 1957
Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 337 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case titled A.L Mehra (Approver) v. The State, adjudicated...
Mandatory Consideration of Evidence by Magistrates Under Section 145 CrPC: A Comprehensive Analysis of Faqir Chand v. Bhana Ram

Mandatory Consideration of Evidence by Magistrates Under Section 145 CrPC: A Comprehensive Analysis of Faqir Chand v. Bhana Ram

Date: Jun 20, 1957
Mandatory Consideration of Evidence by Magistrates Under Section 145 CrPC: A Comprehensive Analysis of Faqir Chand v. Bhana Ram Introduction The case of Faqir Chand And Others v. Bhana Ram And...
Adverse Possession and Equity of Redemption: Insights from Ganda Singh v. Ram Narain Singh

Adverse Possession and Equity of Redemption: Insights from Ganda Singh v. Ram Narain Singh

Date: May 25, 1957
Adverse Possession and Equity of Redemption: Insights from Ganda Singh and others v. Ram Narain Singh Introduction The case of Ganda Singh and others v. Ram Narain Singh adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Prospective Interpretation of the Hindu Married Women's Right to Separate Residence and Maintenance Act, 1946 in Ram Parkash v. Savitri Devi

Prospective Interpretation of the Hindu Married Women's Right to Separate Residence and Maintenance Act, 1946 in Ram Parkash v. Savitri Devi

Date: May 24, 1957
Prospective Interpretation of the Hindu Married Women's Right to Separate Residence and Maintenance Act, 1946 in Ram Parkash v. Savitri Devi Introduction The case of Ram Parkash v. Savitri Devi...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert