Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Recognition of "Body of Individuals" as a Distinct Tax Entity in Meera & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Punjab

Recognition of "Body of Individuals" as a Distinct Tax Entity in Meera & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Punjab

Date: Sep 7, 1978
Recognition of "Body of Individuals" as a Distinct Tax Entity in Meera & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Punjab Introduction The case of Meera And Company v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Punjab,...
Permissible Corrections under Section 152 CPC in Land Possession Suits: The Mohinder Singh v. Teja Singh Precedent

Permissible Corrections under Section 152 CPC in Land Possession Suits: The Mohinder Singh v. Teja Singh Precedent

Date: Aug 30, 1978
Permissible Corrections under Section 152 CPC in Land Possession Suits: The Mohinder Singh v. Teja Singh Precedent Introduction The case of Mohinder Singh And Others v. Teja Singh And Others...
Discretionary Allotment Methods in Urban Housing Schemes: Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab

Discretionary Allotment Methods in Urban Housing Schemes: Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab

Date: Aug 1, 1978
Discretionary Allotment Methods in Urban Housing Schemes: Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of Surjit Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Flexible Permissibility for Parties to Serve as Their Own Witness Under R. 3-A of O. 18 CPC: Insights from Kwality Restaurant v. Satinder Khanna

Flexible Permissibility for Parties to Serve as Their Own Witness Under R. 3-A of O. 18 CPC: Insights from Kwality Restaurant v. Satinder Khanna

Date: Jul 27, 1978
Flexible Permissibility for Parties to Serve as Their Own Witness Under R. 3-A of O. 18 CPC: Insights from Kwality Restaurant v. Satinder Khanna Introduction The case of Kwality Restaurant v....
Doctrine of Merger Reinforced in Amarjit Singh v. Financial Commissioner, Punjab High Court

Doctrine of Merger Reinforced in Amarjit Singh v. Financial Commissioner, Punjab High Court

Date: Jun 3, 1978
Doctrine of Merger Reinforced in Amarjit Singh v. Financial Commissioner, Punjab High Court Introduction The case Amarjit Singh And Ors. v. Financial Commissioner, Taxation, Punjab, Chandigarh And...
Clarifying Pleading Requirements for Landlord Evictions under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act: Paramjit Singh v. Bawa Gurdas Ram

Clarifying Pleading Requirements for Landlord Evictions under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act: Paramjit Singh v. Bawa Gurdas Ram

Date: Jun 3, 1978
Clarifying Pleading Requirements for Landlord Evictions under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act: Paramjit Singh v. Bawa Gurdas Ram Introduction The case of Paramjit Singh And Ors. v. Bawa...
Termination of Ad Hoc Employees: Clarifying the Employer's Right in S.K. Verma v. State of Punjab

Termination of Ad Hoc Employees: Clarifying the Employer's Right in S.K. Verma v. State of Punjab

Date: May 20, 1978
Termination of Ad Hoc Employees: Clarifying the Employer's Right in S.K. Verma v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of S.K. Verma And Ors. v. State Of Punjab And Ors adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Doctrine of Clean Hands and Suppression of Material Facts in Writ Jurisdiction: Charanji Lal v. Financial Commissioner

Doctrine of Clean Hands and Suppression of Material Facts in Writ Jurisdiction: Charanji Lal v. Financial Commissioner

Date: Apr 28, 1978
Doctrine of Clean Hands and Suppression of Material Facts in Writ Jurisdiction: Charanji Lal And Others v. Financial Commissioner, Haryana, Etc. (1978) Introduction The case of Charanji Lal And...
State of Haryana v. Mehal Singh And Anr: Clarifying the Completeness of Police Investigation Reports

State of Haryana v. Mehal Singh And Anr: Clarifying the Completeness of Police Investigation Reports

Date: Apr 13, 1978
State of Haryana v. Mehal Singh And Anr: Clarifying the Completeness of Police Investigation Reports Introduction The case of State of Haryana v. Mehal Singh And Anr was adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Mela Ram v. Mohan Singh And Ors: Establishing Burden of Proof in Motor Accident Claims

Mela Ram v. Mohan Singh And Ors: Establishing Burden of Proof in Motor Accident Claims

Date: Apr 4, 1978
Mela Ram v. Mohan Singh And Ors: Establishing Burden of Proof in Motor Accident Claims Introduction Mela Ram v. Mohan Singh And Ors is a landmark case adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court...
Impact of the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment in Hardwari Lal v. Pohkar Mal

Impact of the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment in Hardwari Lal v. Pohkar Mal

Date: Feb 3, 1978
Impact of the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment in Hardwari Lal v. Pohkar Mal Introduction Hardwari Lal v. Pohkar Mal And Ors is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on...
Apportionment of Compensation under Section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Jog Raj v. Banarsi Dass

Apportionment of Compensation under Section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Jog Raj v. Banarsi Dass

Date: Jan 14, 1978
Apportionment of Compensation under Section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Jog Raj v. Banarsi Dass Introduction The case of Jog Raj and Another v. Banarsi Dass Alias Bana Gopal...
Rattan Chand Jain v. Charan Singh: Upholding Tenant Protections under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act

Rattan Chand Jain v. Charan Singh: Upholding Tenant Protections under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act

Date: Nov 19, 1977
Rattan Chand Jain v. Charan Singh: Upholding Tenant Protections under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act Introduction The case of Rattan Chand Jain v. Charan Singh, adjudicated by the Punjab...
Ganpat v. Ram Devi Etc.: Upholding Local Statutes Over General Civil Procedure

Ganpat v. Ram Devi Etc.: Upholding Local Statutes Over General Civil Procedure

Date: Oct 14, 1977
Ganpat v. Ram Devi Etc.: Upholding Local Statutes Over General Civil Procedure Introduction Ganpat v. Ram Devi Etc. is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on October 13,...
Accrual of Interest and Tax Liability: Insights from Shiv Parkash Janakraj & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Accrual of Interest and Tax Liability: Insights from Shiv Parkash Janakraj & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 28, 1977
Accrual of Interest and Tax Liability: Insights from Shiv Parkash Janakraj & Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Shiv Parkash Janakraj & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Kidar Nath v. Swami Parshad: Defining the Boundaries Between License and Lease

Kidar Nath v. Swami Parshad: Defining the Boundaries Between License and Lease

Date: Sep 22, 1977
Kidar Nath v. Swami Parshad: Defining the Boundaries Between License and Lease 1. Introduction Kidar Nath v. Swami Parshad And Others is a landmark judgment delivered by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Defining the Boundaries of Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Gurbaksh Singh Sibia v. State of Punjab

Defining the Boundaries of Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Gurbaksh Singh Sibia v. State of Punjab

Date: Sep 14, 1977
Defining the Boundaries of Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Gurbaksh Singh Sibia v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of Gurbaksh Singh Sibia v. State of Punjab adjudicated...
Ranbir Singh v. State of Punjab: Upholding the Finality of Medical Qualifications

Ranbir Singh v. State of Punjab: Upholding the Finality of Medical Qualifications

Date: Sep 3, 1977
Ranbir Singh v. State of Punjab: Upholding the Finality of Medical Qualifications Introduction The case of Ranbir Singh v. The State of Punjab And Others was adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Custodial Rights in Minority Guardianship: Insights from Shri Babu Ram v. Shri Keshwa Chand Joshi

Custodial Rights in Minority Guardianship: Insights from Shri Babu Ram v. Shri Keshwa Chand Joshi

Date: Aug 24, 1977
Custodial Rights in Minority Guardianship: Insights from Shri Babu Ram And Another v. Shri Keshwa Chand Joshi Introduction The case of Shri Babu Ram And Another v. Shri Keshwa Chand Joshi adjudicated...
Application of Order 9, Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code in Divorce Proceedings: Manjit Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Gangawala

Application of Order 9, Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code in Divorce Proceedings: Manjit Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Gangawala

Date: Aug 9, 1977
Application of Order 9, Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code in Divorce Proceedings: Manjit Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Gangawala 1. Introduction The case of Manjit Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Gangawala...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert