Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Presumption of Jointness and Admissibility of Secondary Evidence in Hindu Mitakshara Family Law: Gulab Chand v. Sheo Karan Lall Seth

Presumption of Jointness and Admissibility of Secondary Evidence in Hindu Mitakshara Family Law: Gulab Chand v. Sheo Karan Lall Seth

Date: Aug 28, 1963
Presumption of Jointness and Admissibility of Secondary Evidence in Hindu Mitakshara Family Law: Gulab Chand v. Sheo Karan Lall Seth Introduction The case of Gulab Chand v. Sheo Karan Lall Seth,...
Patna High Court Upholds Section 26 of Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1954: A Landmark Decision on Employment Dismissal Procedures

Patna High Court Upholds Section 26 of Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1954: A Landmark Decision on Employment Dismissal Procedures

Date: Aug 8, 1963
Patna High Court Upholds Section 26 of Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1954: A Landmark Decision on Employment Dismissal Procedures Introduction The case of Jagdish Vastralaya And Others v. State...
Jurisdictional Authority in Summary Suits: Insights from Gouri Shankar Bajoria v. Ram Banka

Jurisdictional Authority in Summary Suits: Insights from Gouri Shankar Bajoria v. Ram Banka

Date: Jun 27, 1963
Jurisdictional Authority in Summary Suits: Insights from Gouri Shankar Bajoria v. Ram Banka Introduction The case of Gouri Shankar Bajoria v. Ram Banka adjudicated by the Patna High Court on June 26,...
Siddheshwar Prasad Singh v. Ram Saroop Singh: Reinforcing Mortgage Enforcement Under Bihar Land Reforms Act

Siddheshwar Prasad Singh v. Ram Saroop Singh: Reinforcing Mortgage Enforcement Under Bihar Land Reforms Act

Date: May 17, 1963
Siddheshwar Prasad Singh and Others v. Ram Saroop Singh and Others: Reinforcing Mortgage Enforcement Under Bihar Land Reforms Act Introduction The case of Siddheshwar Prasad Singh and Others v. Ram...
Notice Under Section 80 of CPC: Expunging Defendants and Maintaining Suits Against Public Officers

Notice Under Section 80 of CPC: Expunging Defendants and Maintaining Suits Against Public Officers

Date: May 2, 1963
Notice Under Section 80 of CPC: Expunging Defendants and Maintaining Suits Against Public Officers Introduction The case of Ramcharan Mahto And Others v. Custodian Of Evacuee Property, Bihar And...
Distinguishing Investment from Business Income in Income Tax Law: Insights from Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Distinguishing Investment from Business Income in Income Tax Law: Insights from Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 16, 1963
Distinguishing Investment from Business Income in Income Tax Law: Insights from Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain...
Comprehensive Commentary on Jagdish Chandra Ghose v. Basant Kumar Bose: Valuation of Ejectment Suits for Licensees

Comprehensive Commentary on Jagdish Chandra Ghose v. Basant Kumar Bose: Valuation of Ejectment Suits for Licensees

Date: Apr 7, 1963
Valuation of Ejectment Suits for Licensees: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jagdish Chandra Ghose And Others v. Basant Kumar Bose And Another Opposite Party Introduction The case of Jagdish Chandra Ghose...
Substitution under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC Does Not Constitute Res Judicata: Insights from Dukh Haran Tewary v. Dulhin Bihasa Kuer

Substitution under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC Does Not Constitute Res Judicata: Insights from Dukh Haran Tewary v. Dulhin Bihasa Kuer

Date: Mar 5, 1963
Substitution under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC Does Not Constitute Res Judicata: Insights from Dukh Haran Tewary v. Dulhin Bihasa Kuer Introduction Dukh Haran Tewary v. Dulhin Bihasa Kuer is a landmark case...
Non-Heritability of Occupancy Raiyat Rights: Insight from Patna High Court in Johan Uraon (Ekka) v. Sitaram Sao (Bhagat) And Others

Non-Heritability of Occupancy Raiyat Rights: Insight from Patna High Court in Johan Uraon (Ekka) v. Sitaram Sao (Bhagat) And Others

Date: Feb 15, 1963
Non-Heritability of Occupancy Raiyat Rights: Insight from Patna High Court in Johan Uraon (Ekka) v. Sitaram Sao (Bhagat) And Others Introduction The case of Johan Uraon (Ekka) and Another v. Sitaram...
High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Over Civil Court’s Findings: Raja Singh v. Mahendra Singh

High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Over Civil Court’s Findings: Raja Singh v. Mahendra Singh

Date: Jan 26, 1963
High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Over Civil Court’s Findings: Raja Singh v. Mahendra Singh Introduction The case of Raja Singh and Another v. Mahendra Singh and Others Opposite...
Limits on Review Powers of University Chancellor: Bhola Pd. Singh v. Prof. U.A Goswami

Limits on Review Powers of University Chancellor: Bhola Pd. Singh v. Prof. U.A Goswami

Date: Dec 22, 1962
Limits on Review Powers of University Chancellor: Bhola Pd. Singh v. Prof. U.A Goswami Introduction The case of Bhola Pd. Singh v. Prof. U.A Goswami And Others was adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Recognition of Oral Gifts under Mahomedan Law in Bihar: Analysis of Mt. Bibi Maniran v. Mohammad Ishaque

Recognition of Oral Gifts under Mahomedan Law in Bihar: Analysis of Mt. Bibi Maniran v. Mohammad Ishaque

Date: Dec 7, 1962
Recognition of Oral Gifts under Mahomedan Law in Bihar: Analysis of Mt. Bibi Maniran v. Mohammad Ishaque Introduction The case of Mt. Bibi Maniran v. Mohammad Ishaque adjudicated by the Patna High...
Clarifying Partnership Contributions vs. Loans: Ram Sahay Mall Rameshwar Dayal v. Bishwanath Prasad Judgment Analysis

Clarifying Partnership Contributions vs. Loans: Ram Sahay Mall Rameshwar Dayal v. Bishwanath Prasad Judgment Analysis

Date: Dec 1, 1962
Clarifying Partnership Contributions vs. Loans: Ram Sahay Mall Rameshwar Dayal v. Bishwanath Prasad Judgment Analysis Introduction The case of Firm Ram Sahay Mall Rameshwar Dayal v. Bishwanath...
Notice Requirements in Land Acquisition: Insights from Shivdev Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Notice Requirements in Land Acquisition: Insights from Shivdev Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Date: Dec 1, 1962
Notice Requirements in Land Acquisition: Insights from Shivdev Singh v. The State Of Bihar Introduction The case of Shivdev Singh v. The State Of Bihar And Others was adjudicated by the Patna High...
Kishun Sah v. Harinandan Prasad Sah: Civil Court's Authority to Review Tribunal's Jurisdictional Determinations

Kishun Sah v. Harinandan Prasad Sah: Civil Court's Authority to Review Tribunal's Jurisdictional Determinations

Date: Oct 5, 1962
Kishun Sah v. Harinandan Prasad Sah: Civil Court's Authority to Review Tribunal's Jurisdictional Determinations Introduction The case of Kishun Sah v. Harinandan Prasad Sah adjudicated by the Patna...
Invalidity of Partition Deeds Executed by De Facto Guardians in Muhammadan Family Property Disputes: Sk. Md. Zafir v. Sk. Amiruddin

Invalidity of Partition Deeds Executed by De Facto Guardians in Muhammadan Family Property Disputes: Sk. Md. Zafir v. Sk. Amiruddin

Date: Oct 5, 1962
Invalidity of Partition Deeds Executed by De Facto Guardians in Muhammadan Family Property Disputes: Sk. Md. Zafir v. Sk. Amiruddin Introduction The case of Sk. Md. Zafir v. Sk. Amiruddin,...
Establishing the Validity of Compromises and Limitation Periods in Property Disputes: Insights from Mt. Bibi Aziman v. Mt. Saleha And Others

Establishing the Validity of Compromises and Limitation Periods in Property Disputes: Insights from Mt. Bibi Aziman v. Mt. Saleha And Others

Date: Aug 11, 1962
Establishing the Validity of Compromises and Limitation Periods in Property Disputes: Insights from Mt. Bibi Aziman And Another v. Mt. Saleha And Others Introduction The case of Mt. Bibi Aziman And...
Survival of Cause of Action in Tort Claims: Insights from Jogindra Kuer v. Jagdish Singh

Survival of Cause of Action in Tort Claims: Insights from Jogindra Kuer v. Jagdish Singh

Date: Jul 26, 1962
Survival of Cause of Action in Tort Claims: Insights from Jogindra Kuer And Others v. Jagdish Singh And Others Introduction The case of Jogindra Kuer And Others v. Jagdish Singh And Others...
Legal Commentary on Rohtas Industries Staff Union v. State of Bihar: Defining the Scope of Industrial Disputes and Employer Liability

Legal Commentary on Rohtas Industries Staff Union v. State of Bihar: Defining the Scope of Industrial Disputes and Employer Liability

Date: May 3, 1962
Legal Commentary on Rohtas Industries Staff Union v. State of Bihar: Defining the Scope of Industrial Disputes and Employer Liability Introduction The case of Rohtas Industries Staff Union And Others...
Court Fee Implications on Appeals under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act: Antala Gope v. Smt. Sarbo Gopain And Another

Court Fee Implications on Appeals under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act: Antala Gope v. Smt. Sarbo Gopain And Another

Date: Apr 28, 1962
Court Fee Implications on Appeals under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act Introduction The case of Antala Gope Alias Antilal Gope v. Smt. Sarbo Gopain And Another adjudicated by the Patna High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert