Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

A. Irudayasamy v. V. Perumal Naidu: Establishing Rebuttable Presumptions under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

A. Irudayasamy v. V. Perumal Naidu: Establishing Rebuttable Presumptions under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Date: Jan 25, 1997
A. Irudayasamy v. V. Perumal Naidu: Establishing Rebuttable Presumptions under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act Introduction The case of A. Irudayasamy v. V. Perumal Naidu adjudicated by...
Establishing Standards for Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. V. Gopal

Establishing Standards for Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. V. Gopal

Date: Jan 22, 1997
Establishing Standards for Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. V. Gopal Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. V. Gopal adjudicated...
Madras High Court Upholds Bona Fide Demolition Intent under Section 14(1)(b) of Rent Control Act

Madras High Court Upholds Bona Fide Demolition Intent under Section 14(1)(b) of Rent Control Act

Date: Jan 21, 1997
Madras High Court Upholds Bona Fide Demolition Intent under Section 14(1)(b) of Rent Control Act Introduction The case of S. Saraswathiammal (Deceased) And Two Others v. R.S Mallikarjun Raja And Two...
Establishing Landlord's Right to Evict for Wilful Rent Default and Bona Fide Occupation: Rathinasabapathi v. Krishnan

Establishing Landlord's Right to Evict for Wilful Rent Default and Bona Fide Occupation: Rathinasabapathi v. Krishnan

Date: Jan 21, 1997
Establishing Landlord's Right to Evict for Wilful Rent Default and Bona Fide Occupation: Rathinasabapathi v. Krishnan Introduction The case of Poorman's Depot Registration Firm By Its President,...
Madras High Court Reinforces Managerial Authority in Dismissal Cases Under Industrial Disputes Act

Madras High Court Reinforces Managerial Authority in Dismissal Cases Under Industrial Disputes Act

Date: Jan 11, 1997
Madras High Court Reinforces Managerial Authority in Dismissal Cases Under Industrial Disputes Act Introduction The case of Dharmapuri District Co-Operative Sugar Mills v. Labour Court adjudicated by...
Interest on Business Term Deposits Classified as Business Income: A Comprehensive Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Madras Refineries Ltd.

Interest on Business Term Deposits Classified as Business Income: A Comprehensive Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Madras Refineries Ltd.

Date: Jan 9, 1997
Interest on Business Term Deposits Classified as Business Income: A Comprehensive Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Madras Refineries Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Clarifying Bona Fide Intent and Building Condition in Rent Control Evictions: Sherwood Educational Society v. Abid Namazie

Clarifying Bona Fide Intent and Building Condition in Rent Control Evictions: Sherwood Educational Society v. Abid Namazie

Date: Dec 25, 1996
Clarifying Bona Fide Intent and Building Condition in Rent Control Evictions: Sherwood Educational Society v. Abid Namazie Introduction The case of Sherwood Educational Society, No. 3, Xiii Avenue,...
Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Bona Fide Eviction for Demolition and Reconstruction

Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Bona Fide Eviction for Demolition and Reconstruction

Date: Dec 14, 1996
Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Bona Fide Eviction for Demolition and Reconstruction Introduction The case of Ammal Pillai And Others v. Varadarajulu Complex A Partnership Firm, adjudicated by...
Joint and Several Liability of Vehicle Owner and Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claims

Joint and Several Liability of Vehicle Owner and Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claims

Date: Dec 14, 1996
Joint and Several Liability of Vehicle Owner and Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claims Introduction The case of Kanniappa Nadar vs Jayapandi And Others, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Ashoka Betelnut Company P. Ltd. Etc. v. M.K Chandrakanth: Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Oppression under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956

Ashoka Betelnut Company P. Ltd. Etc. v. M.K Chandrakanth: Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Oppression under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956

Date: Nov 8, 1996
Ashoka Betelnut Company P. Ltd. Etc. v. M.K Chandrakanth: Clarifying Evidentiary Standards for Oppression under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956 Introduction The case of Ashoka Betelnut Company...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pandurangan: A Landmark Judgment on Liability and Procedural Integrity under the Motor Vehicles Act

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pandurangan: A Landmark Judgment on Liability and Procedural Integrity under the Motor Vehicles Act

Date: Nov 5, 1996
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pandurangan: A Landmark Judgment on Liability and Procedural Integrity under the Motor Vehicles Act Introduction The case of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v....
Madras High Court Overturns State Consumer Commission’s Award in Ramaswamy Sugar Mills v. Fareed Bawa

Madras High Court Overturns State Consumer Commission’s Award in Ramaswamy Sugar Mills v. Fareed Bawa

Date: Oct 19, 1996
Madras High Court Overturns State Consumer Commission’s Award in Ramaswamy Sugar Mills v. Fareed Bawa Introduction The case of The Managing Director Nadippisai Pulavar K.R Ramaswamy Sugar Mills,...
Madras High Court Reinforces Company Law Board’s Broad Jurisdiction under Section 397 for Addressing Oppression and Mismanagement: Shoe Specialities v. Standard Distilleries

Madras High Court Reinforces Company Law Board’s Broad Jurisdiction under Section 397 for Addressing Oppression and Mismanagement: Shoe Specialities v. Standard Distilleries

Date: Oct 17, 1996
Madras High Court Reinforces Company Law Board’s Broad Jurisdiction under Section 397 for Addressing Oppression and Mismanagement: Shoe Specialities v. Standard Distilleries Introduction The case of...
Madras High Court Restricts Unwarranted Application of Section 47-A on Stamp Duty Assessments

Madras High Court Restricts Unwarranted Application of Section 47-A on Stamp Duty Assessments

Date: Oct 16, 1996
Madras High Court Restricts Unwarranted Application of Section 47-A on Stamp Duty Assessments Introduction The case of S.P Padmavathi v. The State Of Tamil Nadu, adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Distinguishing Settlement Deeds from Wills: Poongavanam v. Perumal Pillai And Another

Distinguishing Settlement Deeds from Wills: Poongavanam v. Perumal Pillai And Another

Date: Oct 2, 1996
Distinguishing Settlement Deeds from Wills: Poongavanam v. Perumal Pillai And Another Introduction Poongavanam v. Perumal Pillai And Another is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court...
Limits of Executive Power under Article 162: Quashing of G.O.Ms No. 542 by Madras High Court

Limits of Executive Power under Article 162: Quashing of G.O.Ms No. 542 by Madras High Court

Date: Sep 20, 1996
Limits of Executive Power under Article 162: Quashing of G.O.Ms No. 542 by Madras High Court 1. Introduction The case of S. Arunachalam And Others vs. State Of Tamil Nadu pertains to the challenge...
Interpretation and Validity of Section 143(1A)(a) Under Income-Tax Act: Sukra Diamond Tools Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIOT

Interpretation and Validity of Section 143(1A)(a) Under Income-Tax Act: Sukra Diamond Tools Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIOT

Date: Sep 13, 1996
Interpretation and Validity of Section 143(1A)(a) Under Income-Tax Act: Sukra Diamond Tools Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIOT Introduction The case of Sukra Diamond Tools Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of...
Salem Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Establishes Precedent on Deductibility of Statutorily Earmarked Funds

Salem Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Establishes Precedent on Deductibility of Statutorily Earmarked Funds

Date: Sep 11, 1996
Salem Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Establishes Precedent on Deductibility of Statutorily Earmarked Funds Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Salem Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd....
Necessity of Proving Document Contents in Rent Control Proceedings: K. Ramanathan & Others v. B.K. Nalini Jayanthi

Necessity of Proving Document Contents in Rent Control Proceedings: K. Ramanathan & Others v. B.K. Nalini Jayanthi

Date: Sep 11, 1996
Necessity of Proving Document Contents in Rent Control Proceedings Introduction The case of K. Ramanathan (Died) And Others Petitioners v. B.K Nalini Jayanthi, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Limits on Appellate Court’s Power to Remand Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Kannammal v. Kuppanna Gounder

Limits on Appellate Court’s Power to Remand Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Kannammal v. Kuppanna Gounder

Date: Aug 30, 1996
Limits on Appellate Court’s Power to Remand Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Kannammal v. Kuppanna Gounder Introduction The legal landscape is continuously shaped by judicial interpretations that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert