Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Mandatory Undertaking Requirement Under Section 14(2)(b) Affirmed in M. Abu Tahir v. M. Rahamathulla

Mandatory Undertaking Requirement Under Section 14(2)(b) Affirmed in M. Abu Tahir v. M. Rahamathulla

Date: Jul 19, 2005
Mandatory Undertaking Requirement Under Section 14(2)(b) Affirmed in M. Abu Tahir v. M. Rahamathulla Introduction The case of M. Abu Tahir Petitioner v. M. Rahamathulla adjudicated by the Madras High...
Madras High Court Mandates Regular Recruitment of Teachers Over Guest Lecturers

Madras High Court Mandates Regular Recruitment of Teachers Over Guest Lecturers

Date: Jul 16, 2005
Madras High Court Mandates Regular Recruitment of Teachers Over Guest Lecturers Introduction The case of M. Saravanakumar And Others v. Secretary To Government Education Department, Chennai was...
Clarifying the Scope of Order 16, Rule 21 C.P.C: Limitations on Summoning Co-Defendants as Witnesses

Clarifying the Scope of Order 16, Rule 21 C.P.C: Limitations on Summoning Co-Defendants as Witnesses

Date: Jul 14, 2005
Clarifying the Scope of Order 16, Rule 21 C.P.C: Limitations on Summoning Co-Defendants as Witnesses Introduction The case of Minor Arumugam Logesh And Another Petitioners v. State Bank Of India,...
Appellate Procedures in Stamp Duty Assessments: Insights from Jt. Sub-Registrar-I v. Prasanth Chandran

Appellate Procedures in Stamp Duty Assessments: Insights from Jt. Sub-Registrar-I v. Prasanth Chandran

Date: Jul 12, 2005
Appellate Procedures in Stamp Duty Assessments: Insights from Jt. Sub-Registrar-I v. Prasanth Chandran Introduction The case of Jt. Sub-Registrar-I v. Prasanth Chandran, adjudicated by the Madras...
Madras High Court Upholds Securitisation Act: Comprehensive Commentary

Madras High Court Upholds Securitisation Act: Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jul 8, 2005
Madras High Court Upholds Securitisation Act: Comprehensive Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of Digivision Electronics Ltd. v. Indian Bank, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on July 7,...
Strict Interpretation of Bad Debt Provisions in Income Tax Law: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Micromax Systems P. Ltd.

Strict Interpretation of Bad Debt Provisions in Income Tax Law: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Micromax Systems P. Ltd.

Date: Jul 7, 2005
Strict Interpretation of Bad Debt Provisions in Income Tax Law: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Micromax Systems P. Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Ban on Unconstitutional Katta Panchayats in Tamil Nadu: K. Gopal v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Ban on Unconstitutional Katta Panchayats in Tamil Nadu: K. Gopal v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Date: Jul 6, 2005
Ban on Unconstitutional Katta Panchayats in Tamil Nadu: K. Gopal v. The State of Tamil Nadu Introduction The case of K. Gopal v. The State of Tamil Nadu adjudicated by the Madras High Court on July...
Madras High Court Establishes Inclusive Interpretation of 'Qualifying Service' for Pension Eligibility in N. Venkatramani v. Indian Bank

Madras High Court Establishes Inclusive Interpretation of 'Qualifying Service' for Pension Eligibility in N. Venkatramani v. Indian Bank

Date: Jul 5, 2005
Madras High Court Establishes Inclusive Interpretation of 'Qualifying Service' for Pension Eligibility in N. Venkatramani v. Indian Bank Introduction The case of N. Venkatramani v. Indian Bank...
Limits on Appointment of Advocate Commissioners: Insights from Chandrasekaran v. Naidu

Limits on Appointment of Advocate Commissioners: Insights from Chandrasekaran v. Naidu

Date: Jun 30, 2005
Limits on Appointment of Advocate Commissioners: Insights from Chandrasekaran & 6 Others v. V. Doss Naidu Introduction The legal landscape governing civil litigation often grapples with the...
Madras High Court Upholds Mandatory Common Entrance Examinations for Professional Courses: Reinforcing Article 14 and Adherence to Central Regulations

Madras High Court Upholds Mandatory Common Entrance Examinations for Professional Courses: Reinforcing Article 14 and Adherence to Central Regulations

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Madras High Court Upholds Mandatory Common Entrance Examinations for Professional Courses: Reinforcing Article 14 and Adherence to Central Regulations Introduction The case of N. Priyadarshini And...
Scrutiny of Prosecution Witnesses and Evidence: Insights from Secretary @ Mara Naicker And Ors. v. State

Scrutiny of Prosecution Witnesses and Evidence: Insights from Secretary @ Mara Naicker And Ors. v. State

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Scrutiny of Prosecution Witnesses and Evidence: Insights from Secretary @ Mara Naicker And Ors. v. State Introduction The case of Secretary @ Mara Naicker And Ors. v. State By Sub Inspector Of Police...
Protection of Natural Water Resources: A Landmark Judgment in L. Krishnan v. State Of T.N.

Protection of Natural Water Resources: A Landmark Judgment in L. Krishnan v. State Of T.N.

Date: Jun 28, 2005
Protection of Natural Water Resources: A Landmark Judgment in L. Krishnan v. State Of T.N. Introduction The case of L. Krishnan v. State Of T.N. adjudicated by the Madras High Court on June 27, 2005,...
Maintenance of Revision Jurisdiction under Article 227: Gurusamy & 4 Others v. Santhanam

Maintenance of Revision Jurisdiction under Article 227: Gurusamy & 4 Others v. Santhanam

Date: Jun 19, 2005
Maintenance of Revision Jurisdiction under Article 227: Guardiansamy & 4 Others v. Santhanam Introduction The case of Gurusamy & 4 Others v. Santhanam adjudicated by the Madras High Court on June 18,...
Clarifying Limitation Periods for Setting Aside Ex Parte Orders Under Order 9, Rule 7 CPC: Analysis of Rajaji Petitioner v. R. Krishnaji

Clarifying Limitation Periods for Setting Aside Ex Parte Orders Under Order 9, Rule 7 CPC: Analysis of Rajaji Petitioner v. R. Krishnaji

Date: Jun 15, 2005
Clarifying Limitation Periods for Setting Aside Ex Parte Orders Under Order 9, Rule 7 CPC: Analysis of Rajaji Petitioner v. R. Krishnaji Introduction The case of Rajaji Petitioner v. R. Krishnaji,...
Chellakannu v. Kolanji: Court Fee Classification in Declaratory Suits Involving Alleged Misrepresentation

Chellakannu v. Kolanji: Court Fee Classification in Declaratory Suits Involving Alleged Misrepresentation

Date: Jun 15, 2005
Chellakannu v. Kolanji: Court Fee Classification in Declaratory Suits Involving Alleged Misrepresentation 1. Introduction Chellakannu v. Kolanji is a significant judgment delivered by the Madras High...
S. Vijayalakshmi v. Tamil Nadu Water Supply And Drainage Board: Affirmation of Permanent Status and Family Pension Rights

S. Vijayalakshmi v. Tamil Nadu Water Supply And Drainage Board: Affirmation of Permanent Status and Family Pension Rights

Date: Jun 14, 2005
S. Vijayalakshmi v. Tamil Nadu Water Supply And Drainage Board: Affirmation of Permanent Status and Family Pension Rights Introduction The case of S. Vijayalakshmi v. Tamil Nadu Water Supply And...
Recognition of Power of Attorney in Filing Complaints under Section 138 N.I.A.: Y. Vijayalakshmi Rambha Petitioner v. Manickam Narayanan

Recognition of Power of Attorney in Filing Complaints under Section 138 N.I.A.: Y. Vijayalakshmi Rambha Petitioner v. Manickam Narayanan

Date: Jun 9, 2005
Recognition of Power of Attorney in Filing Complaints under Section 138 N.I.A.: Y. Vijayalakshmi Rambha Petitioner v. Manickam Narayanan Introduction The case of Y. Vijayalakshmi Rambha Petitioner v....
Revenue Treatment of Machinery Replacement in Integrated Textile Mills: Janakiram Mills Ltd. Decision

Revenue Treatment of Machinery Replacement in Integrated Textile Mills: Janakiram Mills Ltd. Decision

Date: Apr 30, 2005
Revenue Treatment of Machinery Replacement in Integrated Textile Mills: Janakiram Mills Ltd. Decision Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Janakiram Mills Ltd. addressed a pivotal...
Madras High Court Establishes Rigorous Criteria for Retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act

Madras High Court Establishes Rigorous Criteria for Retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act

Date: Apr 30, 2005
Madras High Court Establishes Rigorous Criteria for Retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act Introduction The case of Manager (P & A), Oil And Natural Gas Corporation, Ltd., Chennai v. G....
Absolute Ownership through Family Arrangement and Validity of Alternative Pleas under the Hindu Succession Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pappayammal v. Palanisamy

Absolute Ownership through Family Arrangement and Validity of Alternative Pleas under the Hindu Succession Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pappayammal v. Palanisamy

Date: Apr 30, 2005
Absolute Ownership through Family Arrangement and Validity of Alternative Pleas under the Hindu Succession Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pappayammal v. Palanisamy 1. Introduction The case of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert