Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Madras High Court Rules Upper Age Limit for Advocate Enrollment Unconstitutional

Madras High Court Rules Upper Age Limit for Advocate Enrollment Unconstitutional

Date: Nov 17, 2006
Madras High Court Rules Upper Age Limit for Advocate Enrollment Unconstitutional Introduction The case of M. Radhakrishnan Petitioner-In-Person v. The Secretary, The Bar Council Of India revolves...
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Presumptions in Property Disputes: Govindarasami Naidu v. Shanmuga Nattar

Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Presumptions in Property Disputes: Govindarasami Naidu v. Shanmuga Nattar

Date: Nov 15, 2006
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Presumptions in Property Disputes: Govindarasami Naidu v. Shanmuga Nattar Introduction The case of Govindarasami Naidu v. Shanmuga Nattar And Another S,...
Madras High Court Upholds Strict Compliance with Limitation Periods in Revision Petitions

Madras High Court Upholds Strict Compliance with Limitation Periods in Revision Petitions

Date: Nov 14, 2006
Madras High Court Upholds Strict Compliance with Limitation Periods in Revision Petitions Introduction The case of Kaliammal And Others Petitioners v. Sundharammal And Another S filed in the Madras...
Madras High Court's Clarification on Order 7 Rule 11 CPC: Ensuring Plaint Disclose Valid Cause of Action

Madras High Court's Clarification on Order 7 Rule 11 CPC: Ensuring Plaint Disclose Valid Cause of Action

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Madras High Court's Clarification on Order 7 Rule 11 CPC: Ensuring Plaint Disclose Valid Cause of Action Introduction The case of J. Lili Jabakani And Others Petitioners v. T.A Chandrasekhar,...
Pandurangan v. Sub-Registrar, Reddiarpalayam: Reinforcing Registrar's Authority under the Registration Act, 1908

Pandurangan v. Sub-Registrar, Reddiarpalayam: Reinforcing Registrar's Authority under the Registration Act, 1908

Date: Nov 9, 2006
Pandurangan v. Sub-Registrar, Reddiarpalayam: Reinforcing Registrar's Authority under the Registration Act, 1908 Introduction The case of Pandurangan v. Sub-Registrar, Reddiarpalayam adjudicated by...
Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148: Procedural Irregularities and Their Implications

Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148: Procedural Irregularities and Their Implications

Date: Nov 9, 2006
Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148: Procedural Irregularities and Their Implications Introduction In the landmark case of Areva T and D India Ltd. (Formerly Known As Alstom Ltd.) v. Assistant...
Rajapandian v. State of Tamil Nadu: Judicial Clarification on Application Requirements in TNPSC Recruitment

Rajapandian v. State of Tamil Nadu: Judicial Clarification on Application Requirements in TNPSC Recruitment

Date: Nov 8, 2006
Rajapandian v. State of Tamil Nadu: Judicial Clarification on Application Requirements in TNPSC Recruitment Introduction In A. Rajapandian (Dr.) v. State Of Tamil Nadu, the Madras High Court...
Landlord’s Refusal to Accept Rent Does Not Constitute Tenant’s Wilful Default: Madras High Court’s Ruling in J.V Bhoopalan Petitioner v. Rajamanickammal And Others

Landlord’s Refusal to Accept Rent Does Not Constitute Tenant’s Wilful Default: Madras High Court’s Ruling in J.V Bhoopalan Petitioner v. Rajamanickammal And Others

Date: Nov 7, 2006
Landlord’s Refusal to Accept Rent Does Not Constitute Tenant’s Wilful Default: Madras High Court’s Ruling in J.V Bhoopalan Petitioner v. Rajamanickammal And Others S Introduction The case of J.V...
Time as Essence in Sale of Immovable Property: Insights from G. Ramalingam v. T. Vijayarangam

Time as Essence in Sale of Immovable Property: Insights from G. Ramalingam v. T. Vijayarangam

Date: Nov 7, 2006
Time as Essence in Sale of Immovable Property: Insights from G. Ramalingam v. T. Vijayarangam Introduction The case of G. Ramalingam v. T. Vijayarangam adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Procedural Standards in Preventive Detention Cases

Madras High Court Establishes Strict Procedural Standards in Preventive Detention Cases

Date: Nov 5, 2006
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Procedural Standards in Preventive Detention Cases Introduction The case of Jarinabegam v. The State of Tamil Nadu adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Madras High Court Validates Section 14-A of Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973

Madras High Court Validates Section 14-A of Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973

Date: Nov 5, 2006
Madras High Court Validates Section 14-A of Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 Introduction The case of Maria Grace Rural Middle School, Venkatarayapuram v. Govt. Of T.N....
Madras High Court's Landmark Ruling on Teacher-Pupil Ratio in Elementary Schools

Madras High Court's Landmark Ruling on Teacher-Pupil Ratio in Elementary Schools

Date: Nov 5, 2006
Madras High Court's Landmark Ruling on Teacher-Pupil Ratio in Elementary Schools Introduction The case of Director Of Elementary Education v. Tmt. S. Vigila adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Clarifying the Dual Requirements for Revisory Powers under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mepco Industries Ltd.

Clarifying the Dual Requirements for Revisory Powers under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mepco Industries Ltd.

Date: Nov 3, 2006
Clarifying the Dual Requirements for Revisory Powers under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mepco Industries Ltd. Introduction The legal landscape surrounding the revisory...
Transfer of Film Exhibition Rights as 'Goods' Under Section 80HHC: Madras High Court Decision

Transfer of Film Exhibition Rights as 'Goods' Under Section 80HHC: Madras High Court Decision

Date: Nov 1, 2006
Transfer of Film Exhibition Rights as 'Goods' Under Section 80HHC: Madras High Court Decision Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. V.C Kuganathan adjudicated by the Madras High...
Madras High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Remedies for Intellectual Property Appellate Board Decisions under Articles 226 and 227

Madras High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Remedies for Intellectual Property Appellate Board Decisions under Articles 226 and 227

Date: Oct 28, 2006
Madras High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Remedies for Intellectual Property Appellate Board Decisions under Articles 226 and 227 Introduction The case of B. Mohamed Yousuff v. Prabha Singh Jaswant...
Madras High Court Establishes Key Precedents on Counter Claims and Estoppel in Property Disputes

Madras High Court Establishes Key Precedents on Counter Claims and Estoppel in Property Disputes

Date: Oct 26, 2006
Madras High Court Establishes Key Precedents on Counter Claims and Estoppel in Property Disputes Introduction The case of S. Murugesan v. V. Vijay Sai And Others adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Madras High Court Upholds Section 40A(3) Applicability to Cash Payments to Associate Concerns

Madras High Court Upholds Section 40A(3) Applicability to Cash Payments to Associate Concerns

Date: Oct 26, 2006
Madras High Court Upholds Section 40A(3) Applicability to Cash Payments to Associate Concerns 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner Of Income Tax IV v. A.D. Jayaveerapandia Nadar &...
Madras High Court Upholds Autonomy of Minority Educational Institutions in Teacher Appointments

Madras High Court Upholds Autonomy of Minority Educational Institutions in Teacher Appointments

Date: Oct 19, 2006
Madras High Court Upholds Autonomy of Minority Educational Institutions in Teacher Appointments 1. Introduction The case of The Corporate Manager, CSI Corporate Schools, CSI Diocese Of Kanyakumari,...
Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Land Acquisition Notification under the National Highways Act, 1956

Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Land Acquisition Notification under the National Highways Act, 1956

Date: Oct 18, 2006
Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Land Acquisition Notification under the National Highways Act, 1956 Introduction The case of The General Manager (Tech.) And Project Director, National Highways...
Transposition of Defendants to Plaintiffs under Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC: Insights from R. Dhanasundari v A.N Umakanth

Transposition of Defendants to Plaintiffs under Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC: Insights from R. Dhanasundari v A.N Umakanth

Date: Oct 13, 2006
Transposition of Defendants to Plaintiffs under Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC: Insights from R. Dhanasundari v A.N Umakanth Introduction The case of R. Dhanasundari R. Rajeswari Petitioner v. A.N Umakanth &...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert