Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Kerala High Court Case Commentaries

Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent on Insurance Policy Transfer and Cross Objections in Motor Accident Claims

Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent on Insurance Policy Transfer and Cross Objections in Motor Accident Claims

Date: Nov 18, 1993
Kerala High Court Establishes Precedent on Insurance Policy Transfer and Cross Objections in Motor Accident Claims Introduction The case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kunhiraman Nambiar And...
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Vanaja Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Vanaja Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 30, 1993
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Vanaja Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Vanaja Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the Kerala...
Comprehensive Commentary on Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Alleppey Co. Ltd.

Comprehensive Commentary on Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Alleppey Co. Ltd.

Date: Sep 23, 1993
Eligibility of Export Credit Premiums and Classification of Hospitality Expenses: A Detailed Analysis of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Alleppey Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of...
Termination Without Retrenchment: Insights from Koodaranji Service Co-Operative Bank v. M.M. Lissy

Termination Without Retrenchment: Insights from Koodaranji Service Co-Operative Bank v. M.M. Lissy

Date: Aug 25, 1993
Termination Without Retrenchment: Insights from Koodaranji Service Co-Operative Bank v. M.M. Lissy Introduction The case of Koodaranji Service Co-Operative Bank, Ltd. v. M.M. Lissy and Others...
Restricting Section 80P(2)(a)(iii) Exemptions to Agricultural Produce Produced by Members: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kerala State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Ltd.

Restricting Section 80P(2)(a)(iii) Exemptions to Agricultural Produce Produced by Members: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kerala State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Ltd.

Date: Aug 12, 1993
Restricting Section 80P(2)(a)(iii) Exemptions to Agricultural Produce Produced by Members: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kerala State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Ltd. Introduction...
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Under Kerala Buildings Act and Doctrine of Lis Pendens: K.A Khader v. Rajamma John Madathil

Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Under Kerala Buildings Act and Doctrine of Lis Pendens: K.A Khader v. Rajamma John Madathil

Date: Aug 6, 1993
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Under Kerala Buildings Act and Doctrine of Lis Pendens: K.A Khader v. Rajamma John Madathil Introduction The case of K.A Khader v. Rajamma John Madathil And Others...
Philanthropic Purpose and Tax Exemption: Kerala High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pulikkal Medical Foundation Pvt. Ltd.

Philanthropic Purpose and Tax Exemption: Kerala High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pulikkal Medical Foundation Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Aug 6, 1993
Philanthropic Purpose and Tax Exemption: Kerala High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pulikkal Medical Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Chandrika Educational Trust: Clarifying Investment under Section 13(2)(h) of the Income Tax Act

Chandrika Educational Trust: Clarifying Investment under Section 13(2)(h) of the Income Tax Act

Date: Jul 22, 1993
Chandrika Educational Trust: Clarifying Investment under Section 13(2)(h) of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Chandrika Educational Trust was adjudicated by...
Validating Testamentary Intent: Insights from K.M Varghese v. K.M Oommen

Validating Testamentary Intent: Insights from K.M Varghese v. K.M Oommen

Date: Jul 21, 1993
Validating Testamentary Intent: Insights from K.M Varghese And Others v. K.M Oommen And Others Introduction The case of K.M Varghese And Others v. K.M Oommen And Others, adjudicated by the Kerala...
Limitations of Subrogation Letters in Insurance: Insights from Arief Trading Company v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Limitations of Subrogation Letters in Insurance: Insights from Arief Trading Company v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Date: Jul 14, 1993
Limitations of Subrogation Letters in Insurance: Insights from Arief Trading Company v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Introduction Case: Arief Trading Company v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd....
Estoppel in Tax Assessments: Compounding Proceedings as Relevant but Not Conclusive - Velimparambil Hardwares v. State Of Kerala

Estoppel in Tax Assessments: Compounding Proceedings as Relevant but Not Conclusive - Velimparambil Hardwares v. State Of Kerala

Date: Jul 6, 1993
Estoppel in Tax Assessments: Compounding Proceedings as Relevant but Not Conclusive Introduction The case of Velimparambil Hardwares v. State Of Kerala ([1993] Kerala High Court) presents a pivotal...
Palghat Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. P. Ramkumar: Clarifying the Scope of Oppression and Continuous Conduct under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act

Palghat Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. P. Ramkumar: Clarifying the Scope of Oppression and Continuous Conduct under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act

Date: May 27, 1993
Palghat Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. P. Ramkumar: Clarifying the Scope of Oppression and Continuous Conduct under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act Introduction Palghat Exports Private Ltd. v. P....
Kerala High Court Clarifies Requirements for Oppression and Mismanagement Claims under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act in Palghat Exports (P) Ltd. v. Chandran

Kerala High Court Clarifies Requirements for Oppression and Mismanagement Claims under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act in Palghat Exports (P) Ltd. v. Chandran

Date: May 27, 1993
Kerala High Court Clarifies Requirements for Oppression and Mismanagement Claims under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act in Palghat Exports (P) Ltd. v. Chandran Introduction The case of Palghat...
Retrospective Taxation and Vested Rights: Insights from Ramalingam Nadar Sons v. State of Kerala

Retrospective Taxation and Vested Rights: Insights from Ramalingam Nadar Sons v. State of Kerala

Date: Apr 8, 1993
Retrospective Taxation and Vested Rights: Insights from Ramalingam Nadar Sons v. State of Kerala Introduction The case of Ramalingam Nadar Sons v. State of Kerala adjudicated by the Kerala High Court...
Interpretation of 'Transfer' under Section 80J(4) for Tax Deduction: Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation v. CIT

Interpretation of 'Transfer' under Section 80J(4) for Tax Deduction: Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation v. CIT

Date: Apr 7, 1993
Interpretation of 'Transfer' under Section 80J(4) for Tax Deduction: Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation v. CIT 1. Introduction The case of Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation v....
Kerala High Court Establishes Government as a Dealer Under KGST Act

Kerala High Court Establishes Government as a Dealer Under KGST Act

Date: Mar 27, 1993
Kerala High Court Establishes Government as a Dealer Under KGST Act Introduction The case of Collector Of Customs v. State Of Kerala adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on March 26, 1993, addresses...
Capitalisation of Technical Know-How Fees: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Kar Valves Ltd.

Capitalisation of Technical Know-How Fees: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Kar Valves Ltd.

Date: Mar 11, 1993
Capitalisation of Technical Know-How Fees: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Kar Valves Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Kar Valves Ltd. adjudicated by the Kerala...
Jurisdictional Autonomy of Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums: Insights from A.V Georgekutty v. State Of Kerala

Jurisdictional Autonomy of Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums: Insights from A.V Georgekutty v. State Of Kerala

Date: Mar 11, 1993
Jurisdictional Autonomy of Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums: Insights from A.V Georgekutty v. State Of Kerala Introduction The case of A.V Georgekutty v. State Of Kerala And Others, adjudicated by...
Sajeevan v. State Of Kerala: Upholding Witness Identification Amid Media Influence

Sajeevan v. State Of Kerala: Upholding Witness Identification Amid Media Influence

Date: Mar 3, 1993
Sajeevan v. State Of Kerala: Upholding Witness Identification Amid Media Influence Introduction The case of Sajeevan v. State Of Kerala adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on March 2, 1993, presents...
Co-owners’ Rights in Property Ejectment: Comprehensive Analysis of B. Valsala v. Sundaram Nadar Bhaskaran

Co-owners’ Rights in Property Ejectment: Comprehensive Analysis of B. Valsala v. Sundaram Nadar Bhaskaran

Date: Mar 2, 1993
Co-owners’ Rights in Property Ejectment: Comprehensive Analysis of B. Valsala v. Sundaram Nadar Bhaskaran Introduction The case of B. Valsala v. Sundaram Nadar Bhaskaran adjudicated by the Kerala...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert