Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Reversion Orders and the Principle of Natural Justice: Insights from Union Of India v. Shiv Shanker

Reversion Orders and the Principle of Natural Justice: Insights from Union Of India v. Shiv Shanker

Date: Mar 25, 2004
Reversion Orders and the Principle of Natural Justice: Insights from Union Of India And Another v. Shiv Shanker Introduction The case of Union Of India And Another v. Shiv Shanker adjudicated by the...
Scope of High Court's Review Jurisdiction in Rent Control Disputes: Insights from Smt. Savitri Devi v. Lal Chand

Scope of High Court's Review Jurisdiction in Rent Control Disputes: Insights from Smt. Savitri Devi v. Lal Chand

Date: Mar 17, 2004
Scope of High Court's Review Jurisdiction in Rent Control Disputes: Insights from Smt. Savitri Devi v. Lal Chand Introduction The case of Smt. Savitri Devi v. Lal Chand (Dead) And Others adjudicated...
Agra Development Authority v. State Of U.P: Invalidity of Litigation Transfers in Land Acquisition Compensation

Agra Development Authority v. State Of U.P: Invalidity of Litigation Transfers in Land Acquisition Compensation

Date: Mar 6, 2004
Agra Development Authority v. State Of U.P: Invalidity of Litigation Transfers in Land Acquisition Compensation Introduction The case of Agra Development Authority, Agra v. State Of U.P And Others...
Allahabad High Court Reinforces Evidentiary Standards in Section 396 IPC: Shiv Nandan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court Reinforces Evidentiary Standards in Section 396 IPC: Shiv Nandan v. State of U.P.

Date: Feb 24, 2004
Allahabad High Court Reinforces Evidentiary Standards in Section 396 IPC: Shiv Nandan v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of Shiv Nandan, Fatehpur And Others (In Jail) v. State Of U.P. adjudicated...
Selection Grade Entitlement After Regularization: Dr. Gopalji Mishra v. State Of U.P And Others

Selection Grade Entitlement After Regularization: Dr. Gopalji Mishra v. State Of U.P And Others

Date: Feb 24, 2004
Selection Grade Entitlement After Regularization: Dr. Gopalji Mishra v. State Of U.P And Others Introduction The case of Dr. Gopalji Mishra v. State Of U.P And Others adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Special Audit Directions under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Jhunjhunwala Vanaspati Ltd. v. ACIOT

Special Audit Directions under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Jhunjhunwala Vanaspati Ltd. v. ACIOT

Date: Feb 18, 2004
Special Audit Directions under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Jhunjhunwala Vanaspati Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of M/S. Jhunjhunwala...
Strict Standards for Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC: Devendra Mohan v. State of U.P.

Strict Standards for Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC: Devendra Mohan v. State of U.P.

Date: Jan 30, 2004
Strict Standards for Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC: Devendra Mohan v. State of U.P. Introduction The case of Devendra Mohan And Others v. State Of U.P And Others was adjudicated by...
Allahabad High Court Clarifies Application of Section 11A in Central Excise Classification Cases - Shahnaz Ayurvedics v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Allahabad High Court Clarifies Application of Section 11A in Central Excise Classification Cases - Shahnaz Ayurvedics v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Date: Jan 30, 2004
Allahabad High Court Clarifies Application of Section 11A in Central Excise Classification Cases - Shahnaz Ayurvedics v. Commissioner Of Central Excise Introduction The case of Shahnaz Ayurvedics v....
Allahabad High Court Upholds Sufficiency of Stamp Duty Paid in Agricultural Land Transfer: Hajeri Lal Sahu v. State Of U.P

Allahabad High Court Upholds Sufficiency of Stamp Duty Paid in Agricultural Land Transfer: Hajeri Lal Sahu v. State Of U.P

Date: Jan 30, 2004
Allahabad High Court Upholds Sufficiency of Stamp Duty Paid in Agricultural Land Transfer: Hajeri Lal Sahu v. State Of U.P Introduction The case of Hajeri Lal Sahu v. State Of U.P And Others was...
Enhancing Economic Unity: Entry Tax on Goods Violates Articles 301 and 304 of the Constitution – Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Enhancing Economic Unity: Entry Tax on Goods Violates Articles 301 and 304 of the Constitution – Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Jan 28, 2004
Enhancing Economic Unity: Entry Tax on Goods Violates Articles 301 and 304 of the Constitution – Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The case of Indian Oil...
Disciplinary Proceedings and Judicial Authority: Analysis of Gajendra Singh v. High Court, Allahabad

Disciplinary Proceedings and Judicial Authority: Analysis of Gajendra Singh v. High Court, Allahabad

Date: Jan 17, 2004
Disciplinary Proceedings and Judicial Authority: Analysis of Gajendra Singh v. High Court, Allahabad Introduction The case of Gajendra Singh v. High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Through The...
Compassionate Employment: Upholding the Rights of Dependents under Uttar Pradesh's Dying-in-Harness Rules

Compassionate Employment: Upholding the Rights of Dependents under Uttar Pradesh's Dying-in-Harness Rules

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Compassionate Employment: Upholding the Rights of Dependents under Uttar Pradesh's Dying-in-Harness Rules Introduction The case of Smt. Rita Devi v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others adjudicated by...
Judicial Deference in State Reorganization: Pushpak Jyoti v. State of U.P.

Judicial Deference in State Reorganization: Pushpak Jyoti v. State of U.P.

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Judicial Deference in State Reorganization: Pushpak Jyoti v. State of U.P. Introduction Pushpak Jyoti v. State Of U.P And Others is a significant judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on...
Allahabad High Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria and Reservation Policy in Teacher Promotions

Allahabad High Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria and Reservation Policy in Teacher Promotions

Date: Dec 9, 2003
Allahabad High Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria and Reservation Policy in Teacher Promotions Introduction In the case of Sunil Kumar Mishra v. Regional Selection Committee And Others, heard by the...
Paramount Bio-Tech Judgment: Affirmation of SEBI's Regulatory Authority on Collective Investment Schemes

Paramount Bio-Tech Judgment: Affirmation of SEBI's Regulatory Authority on Collective Investment Schemes

Date: Nov 26, 2003
Paramount Bio-Tech Judgment: Affirmation of SEBI's Regulatory Authority on Collective Investment Schemes Introduction The case of M/S. Paramount Bio-Tech Industries Ltd. And Another v. Union Of India...
Capital Receipts vs. Revenue Receipts: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sahara Investment India Ltd.

Capital Receipts vs. Revenue Receipts: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sahara Investment India Ltd.

Date: Nov 19, 2003
Capital Receipts vs. Revenue Receipts: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sahara Investment India Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sahara Investment India Ltd....
I.T.C Ltd. v. Commissioner (Appeals), Cus. & C. Ex., Meerut-I: Landmark Ruling on Waiver of Pre-Deposit Conditions in Tax Appeals

I.T.C Ltd. v. Commissioner (Appeals), Cus. & C. Ex., Meerut-I: Landmark Ruling on Waiver of Pre-Deposit Conditions in Tax Appeals

Date: Oct 24, 2003
I.T.C Ltd. v. Commissioner (Appeals), Cus. & C. Ex., Meerut-I: Landmark Ruling on Waiver of Pre-Deposit Conditions in Tax Appeals Introduction The case of I.T.C Ltd. v. Commissioner (Appeals),...
High Court Acquits Accused in Phool Chand Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Hostile Witnesses

High Court Acquits Accused in Phool Chand Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Hostile Witnesses

Date: Oct 24, 2003
High Court Acquits Accused in Phool Chand Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Hostile Witnesses Introduction The case of Phool Chand And Etc. v. State Of U.P. adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Defining 'Judgment' for Special Appeal Under Chapter VIII Rule 5: Ashok Kumar Bajpai v. Dr. Ranjana Bajpai

Defining 'Judgment' for Special Appeal Under Chapter VIII Rule 5: Ashok Kumar Bajpai v. Dr. Ranjana Bajpai

Date: Oct 18, 2003
Defining 'Judgment' for Special Appeal Under Chapter VIII Rule 5: Ashok Kumar Bajpai v. Dr. Ranjana Bajpai Introduction The case of Ashok Kumar Bajpai v. Dr. (Smt.) Ranjana Bajpai was adjudicated by...
Application of Section 34 IPC in Joint Liability: Insights from Gautam And Others v. State Of U.P.

Application of Section 34 IPC in Joint Liability: Insights from Gautam And Others v. State Of U.P.

Date: Oct 14, 2003
Application of Section 34 IPC in Joint Liability: Insights from Gautam And Others v. State Of U.P. Introduction The case of Gautam And Others v. State Of U.P. adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert