Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court642
+ Delhi High Court368
+ Karnataka High Court329
+ Gauhati High Court274
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court252
+ Allahabad High Court234
+ Madras High Court215
+ Calcutta High Court201
+ Supreme Court Of India198
+ Kerala High Court193
+ Patna High Court192
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court150
+ Gujarat High Court136
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court129
+ Orissa High Court124
+ Central Administrative Tribunal115
+ Rajasthan High Court100
+ Telangana High Court84
+ Jharkhand High Court80
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court74
+ Chhattisgarh High Court70
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court62
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal39
+ Manipur High Court36
+ Uttarakhand High Court36
+ Armed Forces Tribunal32
+ Central Information Commission31
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission24
+ Tripura High Court21
+ National Green Tribunal13
+ Meghalaya High Court11
+ SEBI11
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity10
+ Sikkim High Court8
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal8
+ CESTAT7
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal7
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal5
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal4
+ National Company Law Tribunal4
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission2
+ RERA2
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Company Law Board1
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards1272
From 2011 To 20201445
From 2001 To 2010633
From 1991 To 2000443
From 1981 To 1990326
From 1971 To 19809
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19602
Before 19502

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...by a constitutional court and interfering with CCL's decision.33. In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International...futile or reduce to silence any part of the document and make it altogether inapplicable.”34. In Ramana Dayaram Shetty case...participate in the bidding process.35. It was further held that if others (such as the appellant in Ramana Dayaram Shetty case...

...Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489...factual position is so, the High Court placing reliance on the decision in Ramana Dayaram Shetty case (1979) 3 SCC 489...unreasonableness.21. This finding, in our view, is not correct in the light of the facts and circumstances of this case because in Ramana Dayaram Shetty case...

...second decision is Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India.... In Ramana Dayaram Shetty case AIR 1979 SC 1628...to be agencies or instrumentalities of the government was also considered, again at some length, by this Court in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v...

...contention. In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India..., appearing for the appellant strongly relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India...another, the aggrieved party cannot claim protection of Article 14.25. The wide observations made by Hidayatullah, J., was explained in Ramana Dayaram Shetty (...

...decision, relied upon Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489 but has failed to appreciate that the...

...has stated right from the time when Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489 was decided almost...

...this Court in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489...

...(1990) 2 SCC 488 both the principles laid down in Ramana Dayaram Shetty (1979) 3 SCC 489 were reaffirmed. It was reaffirmed that the party issuing the tender (the employer) “has the right to..., deviation from the terms and conditions is permissible so long as the level playing field is maintained and it does not result in any arbitrariness or discrimination in Ramana Dayaram Shetty (1979) 3...bid or a bidder should be looked at not only from the point of view of the unsuccessful party but also from the point of view of the employer. As held in Ramana Dayaram Shetty (1979) 3 SCC 489 the...

...Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489....’ ”57. In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489...following observations made by Mathew, J. (as he then was) in V. Punnen Thomas, v. State Of Kerala, . AIR 1969 Ker 81: (Ramana Dayaram Shetty case...

..., (1975) 3 SCR 619 and Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India...1992 this Court, after referring to various judgments, including the judgment in Ramana Dayaram Shetty case (1979) 3 SCC 489...

...the case of Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489 as to when a corporation can be said to be...

...relying upon judgment delivered in the case of Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India in para 39.2 has held as under:“39.2 The tests...propounded for determining as to when the corporation will be said to be an instrumentality or agency of the Government as stated in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of...held by the Government, it would go a long way towards indicating that the corporation is an instrumentality or agency of Government. (Ramana Dayaram case, SCC p. 507 para 14...

..., Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489 and Chander Moh.... This Court referred to Ajay Hasia (1981) 1 SCC 722 wherein the tests gathered from the decision of this Court in Ramana Dayaram Shetty (1979) 3 SCC 489 were stated in the following terms: (Pradeep...would go a long way towards indicating that the corporation is an instrumentality or agency of Government. (Ramana Dayaram Shetty case (1979...

...Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority: 1979 AIR SC 1628, according to which, no settlement of largesse can be made except by way of tender or contract etc. No...

...Article 14 of the Constitution as interpreted in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. The International Airport Authority of India.1...

...Court in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979...

..., violative of Article 14….’ ”27. In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3...

...by a constitutional court and interfering with CCL's decision.33. In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International...altogether inapplicable.”34. In Ramana Dayaram Shetty case, the expression “registered IInd Class hotelier” was recognised as being inapt and perhaps ungrammatical...that case were held to be factually ineligible to participate in the bidding process.35. It was further held that if others (such as the appellant in Ramana Dayaram Shetty case...

...a bid or a bidder should be looked at not only from the point of view of the unsuccessful party but also from the point of view of the employer. As held in Ramana Dayaram Shetty [Ramana...bidders as held in Ramana Dayaram Shetty [Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority o...Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India, (1979) 3 SCC 489] the terms of NIT cannot be ignored as being redundant or superfluous. They must be given a meaning...

...affirmed and amplified in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India...(1975) 1 SCC 421, (1975) 3 SCR 619, Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of...Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489...