Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Kerala High Court1480
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1371
+ Calcutta High Court1344
+ Bombay High Court774
+ Patna High Court601
+ Karnataka High Court527
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission452
+ Rajasthan High Court446
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission430
+ Delhi High Court413
+ Supreme Court Of India381
+ Madras High Court368
+ Allahabad High Court360
+ Jharkhand High Court354
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission310
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court303
+ Chhattisgarh High Court279
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court265
+ Gujarat High Court217
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court206
+ CESTAT174
+ Orissa High Court149
+ Gauhati High Court142
+ Central Administrative Tribunal92
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court84
+ Armed Forces Tribunal79
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal61
+ Privy Council47
+ Telangana High Court47
+ Uttarakhand High Court35
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal34
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal29
+ Company Law Board28
+ National Green Tribunal27
+ National Company Law Tribunal22
+ Central Information Commission20
+ SEBI20
+ Sikkim High Court20
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange13
+ Tripura High Court13
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal10
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property8
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal7
+ Authority For Advance Rulings6
+ Competition Commission Of India6
+ Meghalaya High Court6
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act4
+ Manipur High Court4
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity3
+ Board of Revenue3
+ Commissioner (Appeals)1
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal1
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board1
+ RERA1
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards4093
From 2011 To 20204855
From 2001 To 2010777
From 1991 To 2000340
From 1981 To 1990379
From 1971 To 1980261
From 1961 To 1970213
From 1951 To 1960190
Before 1950279

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...he shall take up the peremptory hearing of the suit on day to day basis till completion of evidence of both the sides,(iii) That he shall not grant any adjournment to either of the...parties except in extreme urgent cases, and(iv) That in any way he shall dispose of the suit within four months from the date of fixing the first date of peremptory hearing.7...

...matter is listed for peremptory hearing on 12-1-2011, we see no reason to interfere at this stage. However, in view of the stakes involved (including protection of the investors), we are directing the...High Court to proceed with the hearing of the case on day-to-day basis from 12-1-2011, without adjourning the case. We are directing SEBI and Registrar of Companies (RoC) to file its counter-affidavit by...

...absent and take no steps except filing lawyer's hazira. Plaintiff prays for adjournment till 26-6-50 for peremptory hearing. Resummon absent P.Ws P.W's present will go on P.R of Rs. 20 each...request of the plaintiff for any of the purposes mentioned in R. 3 of O. 17. The order merely says that the suit was adjourned for peremptory hearing. The fact that the learned Munsiff, who passed the...

...report will be considered in course of peremptory hearing of the said suit.4. The defendant No. 8.petitioner is aggrieved by the said order passed by the learned Trial Judge on 16th June...of peremptory hearing of the suit. Mr. Bhattacharya, thus, submitted that when the suit is fixed for peremptory hearing and his client is scheduled to give evidence in the said suit, examination of...deferred till the hearing of the suit, any defect discovered in the report of the Commissioner would necessitate an adjournment or postponement of the hearing, and the parties will be put to further expenses...

...the Tribunal fixed peremptory hearing of the reference for May 28, 1976, but the hearing was adjourned from time to time on one ground or other. Eventually, the hearing of the reference was fixed for...aside the ex parte award on the ground that they were prevented by sufficient cause from appearing when the reference was called on for hearing on December 9, 1976. The Tribunal by its order dated April...parties an opportunity of a hearing. We are inclined to the view that where a party is prevented from appearing at the hearing due to a sufficient cause, and is faced with an ex parte award, it is as if...

...is a deity named Banlinga Shiva Thakur represented by his shebait, Shri Phani Bhusan Mukhopadhyaya. After the completion of the preliminary stages, the suit was fixed for peremptory hearing on the...on an application under Or. 9, r. 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure by an order dated the 3rd March, 1953. Thereafter on the 4th September, 1954, the suit was fixed for peremptory hearing on the 12th...shows that this suit was correctly shown therein as fixed for peremptory hearing. Upon these materials the learned Munsif dismissed the plaintiff's application by an order dated the 22nd January, 1955...

...suit proceeded in usual course and it is at the stage of peremptory hearing. Previously, the petitioners instituted a suit being Title Suit No. 191, 1991 before the learned Civil Judge (Junior...suit evidence on behalf of both the sides has been completed and the suit has been fixed for argument the stage of peremptory hearing. The petitioner filed an application for stay of the later suit...judgment is likely to be delivered soon. But in the subsequent suit, it has just reached the peremptory hearing. The reliefs sought for in the two suits are almost identical and it appears that the...

...original number and file and thereafter, in view of the stage of the suit, date was fixed for peremptory hearing. 2It is obvious that during such process, there was some sort of harassment...Article 227 of the Constitution of India, specially when learned Trial Court had posted the suit for peremptory hearing. In view of ...

...Ops were directed to file the written version by 2.8.10 as a special chance on payment of cost of Rs. 300/-. On 2.8.10 written version was filed by the Ops and 30.8.10 was fixed for peremptory hearing. On...30.8.10 in presence of both the parties the peremptory hearing was fixed on 24.9.10. On that date the complainant was found absent on repeated calls even though the Ops were present. Accordingly...the complainant was directed to show cause on 28.10.10. The complainant having shown cause the case was again fixed for peremptory hearing on 29.11.10. On the said date also the complainant was absent...

...on the peremptory hearing board and is pending for quite a long time. In view of nature of the order proposed to be passed, no prior service of notice of this revisional application on...

...long time, despite the same being at the peremptory hearing stage. It is specifically averred in paragraph 17 of this application under...

...of the defendants/petitioners in a suit for cancellation of a sale deed and for permanent injunction is that the suit is pending since 2002 although it has reached the stage of peremptory hearing, but...

.... The petitioners seek a direction for the expeditious disposal of a suit filed in the year 2010 which, according to the petitioners, was posted for peremptory hearing in the year 2013...

...petitioner. The grievance of the plaintiff/petitioner is that a partition suit initiated by the petitioner, despite being on the peremptory hearing board, is being inordinately delayed. In view of the...

...marriage certificate dated May 5, 2015 was vitiated by fraud and is a void document, and for consequential reliefs. Such suit is pending for the last three years and has recently reached the peremptory...hearing stage. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, no prior service of notice on the opposite party is deemed necessary. C. O. No. 1109 of 2018 is disposed of by requesting the...

.... This Court is apprised of that said Ejectment Suit of the year 2010 has come up at peremptory hearing stage, and evidence has been started. In view of such stage learned Trial Court is..., is taken up for hearing. This Court does not feel to keep such application pending for other incidental formalities regarding service of notice, which accordingly is dispensed with...directed to proceed with further hearing of the 2suit without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties so that the suit can be disposed of by December of this year of 2017 and...

...cause shown and the matter was fixed on 11 September, 2006 for peremptory hearing and it appears that on 13 November, 2006, 19 December, 2006 and 17 January, 2007 the case was fixed for peremptory...hearing. On 14 February, 2007 the plaintiffs/petitioners did not appear despite repeated calls. Since the suit was pending from 1989 and was on the peremptory board for long time and as the plaintiffs did...the hearing of the suit as the business of the Court did not permit.6. When the trial has already commenced, in my view, the opportunity should have been given to the plaintiffs...

...and are being so 2posted for hearing at the peremptory hearing stage. The petitioners pray for an expeditious hearing of the said suits. In view of the nature of the...

.... Learned Advocate for the respective parties also apprised the Court that both the suits have now come up at the stage of peremptory hearing. There is no dispute, as...for the opposite party, the direction made above shall be deemed as peremptory in nature. Department is directed to communicate a copy of this order immediately to the learned Trial...

...argued that the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply, since the peremptory hearing of the suit has not yet started. The court below, according to the petitioner...petitioner is right in arguing that the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not applicable, since the peremptory hearing of the suit has not yet started and mere delay, as is...by the trial court on two grounds; first, that there is an order of this Court for expeditious hearing of the suit, and the other that the amendment was belated.3. However, it is...