CiteTEXT
															...' decisions of this Court in Mohd. Nooh AIR 1958 SC 86, 1958 SCR 595...Sahu v. State of Orissa (1969) 3 SCC 384 this Court observed:“14. The distinction adopted in Mohd. Nooh case...the Limitation Act.27. In State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh...
														
															...writ in this case.5. Learned counsel for the appellant however relies on the decision in Mohd Nooh case (1958...of opinion that the principle of Mohd Nooh case (1958) SCR 595 cannot apply in the circumstances of the present case. The question there...facts in Mohd Nooh case (1958) SCR 595 were of a special kind and the reasoning in that case would not apply to the facts of the present...
														
															.... AIR 1963 SC 1124, (1963) 2 SCR 563 another Constitution Bench of this Court has observed that Mohd. Nooh case ...SC 86, 1958 SCR 595 was a case which depended on its own facts. Having said so the Constitution Bench declined to follow the principles laid down by the Constitution Bench in Mohd. Nooh case...State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh . AIR 1958 SC 86, 1958 SCR 595. It has to be...
														
															...Committee since affirmed by the Deputy Commissioner and the Commissioner. The observation of S.R Das, C.J in Mohd. Nooh case 1958...State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh . 1958 SCR 595...
														
															...had no jurisdiction to make an assessment, the decision in Mohd. Nooh (supra) was clearly distinguishable since in that case there was total lack of jurisdiction. This Court also held that under the...v. Mohammad Nooh .) had the occasion to observe as follows:“10. In the next place it must be borne in mind that there is no rule, with regard to certiorari as there is...
														
															...; Union of India vs. T.R. Varma, AIR 1957 SC 882; State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86 and K.S.  g...
														
															...Mukesh And Co. Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd., Patel Complex Padamanabhpur Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 
  4. Mohd Aftab S/o Mohd Nooh, Aged About 37 Years Prop- of M/s Ashma...
														
															...warranting such interference or there exist sufficient grounds to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa.... Income Tax Investigation Commission, Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Union of India v. T.R. Varma, State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh and K.S. Venkataraman and Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Madras have held that...
														
															.... Varma, AIR 1957 SC 882; State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86 and...
														
															.... Nooh) ii) AIR 1997 SC 1125 (L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India) iii) (2013)10 SCC...exception. In support of his contention, he relied on the following four decisions:   i) AIR 1958 SC 86 (U.P. State v. Mohd...
														
															...lordships of the supreme court in u. P. State v. Mohd. Nooh, the fact that the aggrieved party has another adequate remedy may be taken into consideration by the superior court in...
														
															...of the Supreme Court in Mohd. Nooh (supra). We may only reproduce the following paragraph:—“Likewise in Khurshed Modi v. Rent Controller, Bombay it was held that the High Court would not...that purpose reliance is placed in the judgment of the Supreme Court in State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh  ., AIR 1958 SC 86.6. On...
														
															...; Union of India vs. T.R. Varma, AIR 1957 SC 882; State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh, ...: State of U.P. vs. Mohammad Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86; Titag...
														
															..., the doctrine has no application in a case where the impugned order has been made in violation of the principles of natural justice. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh [State of...U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh, 1958 SCR 595 : AIR 1958 SC 86...
														
															...flow from or accompany it.3. Mr B. Dutta, learned Additional Solicitor General submitted that the decision in Mohd. Nooh case...State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh . AIR 1958 SC 86 to buttress the plea. It was, therefore, submitted that if one is bi...
														
															...(State of UP v. Mohd. Nooh) in support of such contention. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from a jurisdictional error. He submits that where the...Directors or by the person concerned or by any person subordinate to him.8. Andrew Yule (supra) relies upon Md. Nooh (supra) and is of the view that in an appropriate case, the inability on...
														
															...(State of UP v. Mohd. Nooh) in support of such contention. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from a jurisdictional error. He submits that where the...Directors or by the person concerned or by any person subordinate to him.8. Andrew Yule (supra) relies upon Md. Nooh (supra) and is of the view that in an appropriate case, the inability on...
														
															...(State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh), 1958 SCR 598, as under:  But this rule requiring the exhaustion of statutory remedies before the writ will be granted...
														
															...(State of UP v. Mohd. Nooh) in support of such contention. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from a jurisdictional error. He submits that where the...Directors or by the person concerned or by any person subordinate to him.8. Andrew Yule (supra) relies upon Md. Nooh (supra) and is of the view that in an appropriate case, the inability on...
														
															...of the Supreme Court in State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh ., AIR 1958 SC 86. Mohd. Nooh was a police constable. He was dismissed from...-1949 were challenged by Mohd. Nooh by filing a writ petition in this Court. The petition was allowed by this Court; and the two orders passed by the police authorities in 1948 and 1949 were quashed. The...have accrued and vested would remain unaffected. 
18. Mohd. Nooh's case was decided by the Supreme Court on the principle that the State of U. P. had acquired certain rights by...