Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Allahabad High Court54
+ Patna High Court34
+ Gujarat High Court31
+ Madras High Court28
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court27
+ Bombay High Court27
+ Delhi High Court18
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court16
+ Central Administrative Tribunal15
+ Karnataka High Court15
+ Gauhati High Court14
+ Calcutta High Court13
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court12
+ Supreme Court Of India12
+ Rajasthan High Court11
+ Chhattisgarh High Court10
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court8
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission8
+ Orissa High Court8
+ Telangana High Court7
+ Meghalaya High Court5
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court4
+ Manipur High Court3
+ Armed Forces Tribunal2
+ Kerala High Court2
+ Tripura High Court2
+ Uttarakhand High Court2
+ Jharkhand High Court1
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards145
From 2011 To 2020116
From 2001 To 201049
From 1991 To 200027
From 1981 To 19905
From 1971 To 19809
From 1961 To 19709
From 1951 To 19604
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...' decisions of this Court in Mohd. Nooh AIR 1958 SC 86, 1958 SCR 595...Sahu v. State of Orissa (1969) 3 SCC 384 this Court observed:“14. The distinction adopted in Mohd. Nooh case...the Limitation Act.27. In State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh...

...writ in this case.5. Learned counsel for the appellant however relies on the decision in Mohd Nooh case (1958...of opinion that the principle of Mohd Nooh case (1958) SCR 595 cannot apply in the circumstances of the present case. The question there...facts in Mohd Nooh case (1958) SCR 595 were of a special kind and the reasoning in that case would not apply to the facts of the present...

.... AIR 1963 SC 1124, (1963) 2 SCR 563 another Constitution Bench of this Court has observed that Mohd. Nooh case ...SC 86, 1958 SCR 595 was a case which depended on its own facts. Having said so the Constitution Bench declined to follow the principles laid down by the Constitution Bench in Mohd. Nooh case...State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh . AIR 1958 SC 86, 1958 SCR 595. It has to be...

...Committee since affirmed by the Deputy Commissioner and the Commissioner. The observation of S.R Das, C.J in Mohd. Nooh case 1958...State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh . 1958 SCR 595...

...had no jurisdiction to make an assessment, the decision in Mohd. Nooh (supra) was clearly distinguishable since in that case there was total lack of jurisdiction. This Court also held that under the...v. Mohammad Nooh .) had the occasion to observe as follows:“10. In the next place it must be borne in mind that there is no rule, with regard to certiorari as there is...

...; Union of India vs. T.R. Varma, AIR 1957 SC 882; State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86 and K.S. g...

...Mukesh And Co. Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd., Patel Complex Padamanabhpur Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4. Mohd Aftab S/o Mohd Nooh, Aged About 37 Years Prop- of M/s Ashma...

...warranting such interference or there exist sufficient grounds to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa.... Income Tax Investigation Commission, Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Union of India v. T.R. Varma, State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh and K.S. Venkataraman and Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Madras have held that...

.... Varma, AIR 1957 SC 882; State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86 and...

.... Nooh) ii) AIR 1997 SC 1125 (L.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India) iii) (2013)10 SCC...exception. In support of his contention, he relied on the following four decisions: i) AIR 1958 SC 86 (U.P. State v. Mohd...

...lordships of the supreme court in u. P. State v. Mohd. Nooh, the fact that the aggrieved party has another adequate remedy may be taken into consideration by the superior court in...

...of the Supreme Court in Mohd. Nooh (supra). We may only reproduce the following paragraph:—“Likewise in Khurshed Modi v. Rent Controller, Bombay it was held that the High Court would not...that purpose reliance is placed in the judgment of the Supreme Court in State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh ., AIR 1958 SC 86.6. On...

...; Union of India vs. T.R. Varma, AIR 1957 SC 882; State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh, ...: State of U.P. vs. Mohammad Nooh, AIR 1958 SC 86; Titag...

..., the doctrine has no application in a case where the impugned order has been made in violation of the principles of natural justice. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh [State of...U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh, 1958 SCR 595 : AIR 1958 SC 86...

...flow from or accompany it.3. Mr B. Dutta, learned Additional Solicitor General submitted that the decision in Mohd. Nooh case...State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh . AIR 1958 SC 86 to buttress the plea. It was, therefore, submitted that if one is bi...

...(State of UP v. Mohd. Nooh) in support of such contention. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from a jurisdictional error. He submits that where the...Directors or by the person concerned or by any person subordinate to him.8. Andrew Yule (supra) relies upon Md. Nooh (supra) and is of the view that in an appropriate case, the inability on...

...(State of UP v. Mohd. Nooh) in support of such contention. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from a jurisdictional error. He submits that where the...Directors or by the person concerned or by any person subordinate to him.8. Andrew Yule (supra) relies upon Md. Nooh (supra) and is of the view that in an appropriate case, the inability on...

...(State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Nooh), 1958 SCR 598, as under: But this rule requiring the exhaustion of statutory remedies before the writ will be granted...

...(State of UP v. Mohd. Nooh) in support of such contention. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from a jurisdictional error. He submits that where the...Directors or by the person concerned or by any person subordinate to him.8. Andrew Yule (supra) relies upon Md. Nooh (supra) and is of the view that in an appropriate case, the inability on...

...of the Supreme Court in State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh ., AIR 1958 SC 86. Mohd. Nooh was a police constable. He was dismissed from...-1949 were challenged by Mohd. Nooh by filing a writ petition in this Court. The petition was allowed by this Court; and the two orders passed by the police authorities in 1948 and 1949 were quashed. The...have accrued and vested would remain unaffected. 18. Mohd. Nooh's case was decided by the Supreme Court on the principle that the State of U. P. had acquired certain rights by...