Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court659
+ Kerala High Court417
+ Central Administrative Tribunal415
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission268
+ National Green Tribunal189
+ Karnataka High Court160
+ Supreme Court Of India137
+ Telangana High Court124
+ Rajasthan High Court94
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal71
+ Madras High Court62
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court46
+ Patna High Court35
+ Gujarat High Court30
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court30
+ Allahabad High Court28
+ Calcutta High Court26
+ Delhi High Court26
+ Chhattisgarh High Court23
+ CESTAT20
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission16
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court15
+ Jharkhand High Court11
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal10
+ National Company Law Tribunal10
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal9
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court8
+ Orissa High Court8
+ Gauhati High Court7
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court4
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission3
+ Tripura High Court3
+ Uttarakhand High Court3
+ Central Information Commission2
+ RERA2
+ SEBI2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity1
+ Competition Commission Of India1
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board1
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards1421
From 2011 To 2020847
From 2001 To 201086
From 1991 To 200061
From 1981 To 199048
From 1971 To 198037
From 1961 To 197030
From 1951 To 19607
Before 19507

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Bench judgments of this Court, one of 1963 in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR....3. In Ajit Singh II v. State of Punjab (1999) 7 SCC 209 it was stated (at pp. 229-30) relying upon earlier judgments starting from...1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1) SCR 439 and another in 1968 in C.A Rajendran v. Union Of India & Others...

...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1) SCR 439 had been..., AIR 1967 SC 1283, (1967) 2 SCR 265, (1967) 2 SCJ 187 that the principles laid down in M.R ...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore. The Commission has not collected the necessary data and particulars for the purpose of ascertaining the social and educational ba...

...office memorandum dated July 20, 1974, we consider that the case falls within the principles laid down in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore...vacancies, and de-reservation is called for by reason of the prohibition, in clause (v) of para 2 of the office memorandum dated July 20, 1974, against the carry forward of reservations from year to...that the vacancies pertain to selection posts. On this point, we find ourselves bound by the decision of this Court in General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari...

...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore (1963) Supp 1 to the effect that it was not irrelevant to consider the caste of a class of citizens in determining their social...

...reservation would go beyond 50 per cent which is not permitted in view of the law laid down by this Court in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore...

...persons from amongst the more advanced classes. The reservation would thus be more than 50%. It has been held by this Court in M.R Balaji v. State...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649 in support of the contention that.... This comes to about 64.4% of reservation. Such being the result of the operation of the carry forward rule we must, on the basis of the decision in Balaji case...

..., M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore (1963) Supp 1 SCR 439 in which Gajendragadkar, J., as he then was, speaking for the unanimous Court stated as...brought to this Court by the General Manager, Southern Railway (General Manager, Southern Railway v. Rangachari...members of separate, independent classes. Dealing with the extent of protection of Article 16(1) of the Constitution, this Court stated in General Manager, Southern Railway v...

...: (1992) 22 ATC 385, followedM.R Balaji v. State o...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore, AIR 1963 SC 649...: 1981 SCC (L&S) 50; M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore...

.... Balaji v. State of Mysore 1963 Supp (1) SCR 439, ...Court for the first time. It was further submitted that there is a need for reconsideration of the judgment of this Court in Indra Sawhney v...Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India 2020 SCC OnLine SC 624, in which the validity of the Constitution (103rd) Amendment Act, 2019...

...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore and so, it is common ground that the petitioners are entitled to an appropriate writ or order as claimed by...them.3. Learned counsel for the respondents however, drew our attention to the fact that as a result of the decision of the Court in the case of M.R Balaji Respondent 1 was feeling some...

...contention, our attention was invited to the decision of this Court in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore...course was done on State-wise basis. In the year 1967-68, the seats were distributed on district-wise basis but that scheme was held to be invalid by this Court in P. Rajendran v. State of...R. Chitralekha v. State Of Mysore AIR 1964 SC 1823, (1964) 6 SCR 368...

...of this Court in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp 1 SCR...been placed on the decision of this Court in Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar...Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India AIR 1957 SC 397, 1957 SCR...

...with castes. In M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1...Subhash Chandra v. State of U.P AIR 1973 All 295. The High Court struck down the aforesaid reservation in the case of D...Kumar v. State of U.P AIR 1973 All 592. The High Court in the case of Dilip Kumar however did not consider the case of Subhash Chandra which was an earlier decision. It is desirable from the...

...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1) SCR 439 by its circular dated Novemb...reservation as laid down by this Court in M.R Balaji case AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1) SCR 439 can be up to 50 per cent. The Government...excessive which would in effect efface the guarantee of equal opportunity in the matter of public employment or at best make it illusory. In Balaji case...

...subject to the rule that such representation should not be excessive. In M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore(1) and Devadasan v. Union of India(2) the Supreme Court opined that any...

...India (1996) 4 SCC 119. In fact, as long back as in 1963, in M.R Balaji v. State...16(4) and 16(4-A). Such a balancing principle was enunciated by the Constitution Bench in 1963 in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore...this Court as reasonable and mandamus was refused. Even in M.R Balaji case AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1) SCR 439 the Constitution Bench...

...that in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1) SCR...(1974) 1 SCC 87 the earlier decision in M.R Balaji case AIR 1963 SC 649, 1963 Supp (1) SCR 439 was noticed and followed and no departure from the decision in Devadasan ...(1988) 2 SCC 214, (1988) 7 ATC 104 after relying on the decisions in Arati Ray Choudhury (1974) 1 SCC 87, ...

...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore 1963 Supp 1 SCR 439...M.R Balaji 1963 Supp 1 SCR 439, AIR 1963 SC 649...Sujata V. Manohar, J.— The Government of Andhra Pradesh in the year 1984 decided that women were not getting their due share of public employment. It decided...

...M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore, AIR 1963 SC 649 in which it was pointed out by the Supreme Court that backwardness under...

...particular class is a backward class or not. Though the decision in M.R Balaji v. State of Mysore (1963) Supp 1 SCR 439 turned upon Article...decision in R. Chitralekha v. State Of Mysore (1964) 6 SCR 368 also turned upon the interpretation of Article 15(4) of the Constitution. In...backward i.e socially and educationally, in the sense explained in Balaji case(i); and (ii) the said class is not adequately represented in the services under the State.8. The...