Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Punjab & Haryana High Court
577
Central Administrative Tribunal
361
Delhi High Court
301
Himachal Pradesh High Court
257
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
205
Patna High Court
176
Rajasthan High Court
174
Supreme Court Of India
151
Allahabad High Court
108
Bombay High Court
86
Calcutta High Court
69
Gujarat High Court
62
Madras High Court
54
Madhya Pradesh High Court
48
Andhra Pradesh High Court
45
Karnataka High Court
45
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
44
Kerala High Court
40
Gauhati High Court
39
Chhattisgarh High Court
28
Telangana High Court
19
Uttarakhand High Court
19
Central Information Commission
13
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
13
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
13
Tripura High Court
13
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
11
Orissa High Court
11
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
8
Jharkhand High Court
7
Manipur High Court
5
Meghalaya High Court
5
CESTAT
4
Armed Forces Tribunal
3
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
3
Company Law Board
2
Debts Recovery Tribunal
2
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
2
SEBI
2
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
1
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
1
National Company Law Tribunal
1
National Green Tribunal
1
Sikkim High Court
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
0
Authority For Advance Rulings
0
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Competition Appellate Tribunal
0
Competition Commission Of India
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
District Court
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Jaipur
0
Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
0
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
0
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
Privy Council
0
RERA
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
1246
From 2011 To 2020
990
From 2001 To 2010
258
From 1991 To 2000
135
From 1981 To 1990
164
From 1971 To 1980
83
From 1961 To 1970
2
From 1951 To 1960
2
Before 1950
0

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...' case following its earlier decision in Inder Sain vs State of Punjab, (1973) 2 SCC 372. It was held (vide para 18 & 19 of Gopaldas...Collector of Customs vs S.Saravana Perumal @ Saravanan and others on 13.04.2010 and thus, the acquittal of the respondents/accused persons have become...year 1995 by show cause notice dated 04.01.1995 against them. He relied upon the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of N.Jayathilakan vs Additional Secretary...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Jun 24, 2019 Cited By: 2 Coram: 2
2

...Inder Sain vs. State of Punjab, 1973 (2) SCC 372 arising under the Opium Act, the learned Trial Judge charged the accused of having conscious possession of poppy husk. Assuming...Avtar Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab, 2002 (2) EFR 605 wherein Hon'ble Apex Court on the similar situation held as under...The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code feeling aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 6.3.2003 passed by...


Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Date: Sep 19, 2006 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
3

...in Inder Sain Vs. State of Punjab, (1973) 2 SCC 372 arising under the Opium Act, the learned trial Judge charged the accused of having...Avtar Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2002) 4 RCR(Cri) 180, in which the Hon''''ble Supreme Court has held that where in course of cross-examination under Section 313.... In this regard, learned counsel for the appellant has relied a judgment of the Hon''''ble Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan Vs. Parmanand and another, (2014) 2 RCR(Cri) 40...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Aug 6, 2018 Cited By: 4 Coram: 1
4

...Inder Sain Vs. State of Punjab (1973 (2) SCC 372) arising under the Opium Act, the learned trial Judge charged the accused of having conscious possession of poppy husk. Assuming...& others Vs. State of Punjab, 2003 (1) JIC 134 (SC). Referring the aforesaid Judgments, he submits that mere sitting at a place or on motorcycle cannot be a piece of evidence that a person was...Judgments of the Apex Court rendered in the cases of Bhola Ram Kushwaha Vs. State of M.P., Cr. Appeal No.983 of 2002 decided on November 16, 2000 and Avtar Singh...


Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: Dec 16, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
5

...Inder Sain Vs. State of Punjab (1973 (2) SCC 372) arising under the Opium Act, the learned trial Judge charged the accused of having conscious...possession of the contraband, relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Avtar Singh vs. State of Punjab...Dalbir Singh @ Beera vs. The State of Punjab and 2007(4) RCR (Crl.) 898...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Dec 2, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
6

...go into the aspect whether the possession must be conscious possession. Perhaps taking clue from the decision of this Court in Inder Sain vs. State of Punjab (1973 (2...Avtar Singh and ors vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2002)7 SCC 419 observed that "possession" is the core ingredient to be established before the accused in the instant case are subjected to the.../- 8 1. Mangilal vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh, reported in 2023(5) Mh.L.J. (Cri) (SC) 321...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Apr 23, 2025 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
7

.... In Mohd. Akhtar vs. State of M. P., 1999 (2) MPLJ 525 it has been held by this Court after referring to the decision of the Supreme Court in Inder Sain vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1973 SC...Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 2000 SC 821 the Supreme Court construing section 35 of the Act has held that the burden is on the accused to prove that he had no...Jagdish vs. State of M. P., 2002 (1) C. Cr. J. 149 (SC) cited by the learned counsel for the appellants is not applicable to the present case as it is distinguishable on facts. There were...


Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Date: Mar 18, 2002 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
8

...time and to adopt them as the law of this country. Only one instance will suffice to illustrate this tendency. In Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P (1973...P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.— This appeal is by special leave against the grant of a probate of the Will of Bhim Sain Arora dated February 8, 1961 in favour of his wife Saraswati..., Personal Assistant to the deceased Bhim Sain on October 11, 1960. This letter was answered by Puri on December 26, 1960. The correspondence shows that both of them were looking for partners who conformed...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Aug 9, 1974 Cited By: 300 Coram: 3
9

.... The first case in point of time to which our attention was drawn is the decision in Inder Sain v. State of Punjab (1973) 2 SCC 372. In the said...Dr. M.K Sharma, J.— The present appeal is an appeal filed by the State of Punjab challenging the judgment and order dated 20-8-2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and...respondents of all the charges. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order of acquittal, the present appeal was filed by the State of Punjab on which we have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Apr 5, 2010 Cited By: 97 Coram: 2
10

...(1985) 4 SCC 417, 1985 Supp 1 SCR 657 and Mohinder Sain Garg v. State of Punjab (1991) 1 SCC...made on the basis of marks obtained in the qualifying examination and marks secured in the interview, in accordance with the K.S.C.S (Direct Recruitment By Selection) Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred...leave. It is not necessary to examine the matter in detail inasmuch as 50 marks for interview out of 150 are clearly in violation of the judgment of this Court in Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Oct 11, 1991 Cited By: 169 Coram: 2
11

...not go into the aspect whether the possession must be conscious possession. Perhaps taking a cue from the decision of this Court in Inder Sain v. State of Punjab...thereunder, produces, possesses, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter-State, sells, purchases, uses or omits to warehouse poppy straw or removes or does any act in respect of warehoused poppy...(1973) 2 SCC 372 arising under the Opium Act, the learned trial Judge charged the accused of having conscious possession of poppy husk. Assuming that poppy husk comes within the...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Sep 18, 2002 Cited By: 295 Coram: 1
12

...opinion, they are not directly in point. On the other hand, a later decision of this Court in Inder Sain v. State of Punjab (1973) 2 SCC 372...case referred to above (Inder Sain case (1973) 2 SCC 372, AIR 1973 SC 2309, (1974) 1 SCR 215 an identical argument was put forward which was...shop belonged to him and were kept by him, the servant being merely in-charge of the shop whenever the appellant was absent. This Court in Inder Sain case...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Aug 8, 1985 Cited By: 4 Coram: 2
13

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Dec 8, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
14

.... State of Punjab (1973) 2 SCC 372 arising under the Opium Act, the learned trial Judge charged the accused of having conscious possession of poppy...the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, which has been held to be mandatory. In this case, admittedly no consent memo was prepared. In State of Punjab v. Labh Singh...Magistrate, and the accused had been acquitted by the Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court refused to interfere in the order of acquittal. In State of Punjab v. Kulwant Singh (1994) 1 RCR (Cri) 303 (P&H...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Sep 9, 2010 Cited By: 291 Coram: 2
15

...for recovery of possession on the termination or expiry of the period of tenancy. It was filed because of Section 1(3) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973...respondent's application. Aggrieved thereby, the tenant respondent preferred a revision to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The High Court held that as the suit had not been decreed within the...of the U.P Act had come up for consideration before this Court in the case of Vineet Kumar v. Mangal Sain Wadhera (1984) 3 SCC 352, AIR...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Aug 22, 1988 Cited By: 287 Coram: 2
16

.... Additionally, voluntary disclosure statements made by Inder Sain Jain (HUF) and letter addressed to the Commissioner of Income-tax explaining the purchases, were brought on record. In spite of objection from...because of the involvement of Chedi Lal and Satya Pal Jain and Inder Sain Jain (HUF), the fact that purchases, were made and payments made cannot be doubted. Accordingly Revenue's appeal was dismissed...also asked for. Summons under Section 131 of the Act were also issued to the alleged seller. Assessee failed to produce the party. A registered letter sent by the Income Tax Officer on 23 October 1973...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Mar 15, 2001 Cited By: 118 Coram: 2
17

...properties of Lala Inder Sain, being his adopted son, he stood estopped from claiming that he is still the son of Bhushan Parkash. It was submitted that Civil Suit No. 11 of 1973/404 of 1978 was decreed by Sub...Chand Rai was the adopted son of Lal Inder Sain, was not scrutinised by the appellate Court in Civil Suit No. 11 of 1973/404 of 1978. Therefore, it would not better to bring on record Jai Chand...Sain son of Shri Mohan Lal. It was alleged by the plaintiff that Jai Chand Rai had ceased to be the son of Shri Bhushan Parkash on account of his transplantation through adoption to Lala Inder Sain son...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Apr 25, 2001 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

...of this Court in the case titled as Inder Sain v. Man Singh Gujjar, AIR 1992...upon this court. As such I do not wish to discuss the merit or demerit of this contention. In the case of Inder Sain (supra), the court held as under:—“When the petitioners were...absence of counsel for the respondents.3. Though, as already noticed, the matter in issue in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Inder...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Jul 17, 2000 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
19

...herein. 2. An identical controversy came up for adjudication before this Bench in OA. 904/CH/2011 titled Inder Sain Sachdeva Vs. UOI which came to be allowed in favour of the applicant...institution which has been empanelled by the Government of Punjab as well. 3. In Inder Sain Sachdeva (supra), the treatment had been obtained from a hospital which was not even empanelled... HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND, MEMBER(J):- 1. A claim raised by the applicant herein, for medical reimbursement in respect of the treatment obtained by his wife...


Court: Central Administrative Tribunal
Date: Jul 6, 2012 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
20

...S.S SARON, J.Heard counsel for the parties.Petitioner-Inder Sain has filed the present criminal miscellaneous petition for grant of regular bail in a case...to the petitioner-Inder Sain is somewhat similar to that of said Avtar Singh.Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the role attributed to the present petitioner is...83 and Mulakh Raj v. State of Punjab, 1998 (1) RCR (Criminal) 43; besides, of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Smt...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Sep 2, 2011 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).