Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
National Green Tribunal
51
Rajasthan High Court
41
Supreme Court Of India
12
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
6
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
4
Bombay High Court
3
Karnataka High Court
3
Uttarakhand High Court
3
Central Administrative Tribunal
2
Company Law Board
2
Delhi High Court
2
Gujarat High Court
2
Madhya Pradesh High Court
2
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
1
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
1
Madras High Court
1
Meghalaya High Court
1
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
1
Orissa High Court
1
Punjab & Haryana High Court
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
0
Allahabad High Court
0
Andhra Pradesh High Court
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
0
Armed Forces Tribunal
0
Authority For Advance Rulings
0
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
CESTAT
0
Calcutta High Court
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Central Information Commission
0
Chhattisgarh High Court
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Competition Appellate Tribunal
0
Competition Commission Of India
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
District Court
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Gauhati High Court
0
Himachal Pradesh High Court
0
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
0
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
0
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
0
Jharkhand High Court
0
Kerala High Court
0
Manipur High Court
0
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
0
National Company Law Tribunal
0
Patna High Court
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
Privy Council
0
RERA
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
SEBI
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Sikkim High Court
0
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
Telangana High Court
0
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Tripura High Court
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
67
From 2011 To 2020
49
From 2001 To 2010
7
From 1991 To 2000
7
From 1981 To 1990
3
From 1971 To 1980
2
From 1961 To 1970
0
From 1951 To 1960
0
Before 1950
0

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...he was disrupting the meeting because of the Sariska case and that he used abusive language and was shouting and that was not amenable to any reasoning, all the time protesting against his resignation...petitioner, is filed. Dr Rajeev Dhavan, now a Senior Advocate of this Court, has been appearing for the petitioner in this case over the last three or more years. In his affidavit, Shri Dhavan has...Sariska Tiger Reserve area. On account of this, the mine-owners in the area and their supporters have been threatening and harassing the Secretary and other office-bearers and members of the petitioner...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Nov 8, 1994 Cited By: 5 Coram: 2
2

...:- "4. It is thus clear that the mining activities and mineral extraction in case of 57 operational mines which are falling within one kilometer of CTH of Sariska Tiger Reserve... 8. That for cancellation of the agreement to sell in respect of Sariska Palace, the case bearing No. CFA 331/2001...under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 before the Court of the Assistant Conservator of Forests, Sariska. and a case was 10...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Jul 27, 2026 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
3

...and urgency of maintenance of the Sariska Tiger Reserve as indicated in the affidavit of the said Joint Director of Project Tiger in disposing of the prayer for granting permission only in appropriate case on...areas comprising Sariska National Park and Sariska-Sanctuary notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, no such activities, as referred to in the said Notification...comprising Sariska National Park and Sariska Sanctuary as notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, no mining operation or other activities are being carried and no such...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Oct 7, 1999 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
4

...transmission line because of Sariska Tiger Sanctuary coming in the way and ROW problems; (c) There is cost over-run in case of Asset-a. Asset-b is within the cost...Appeal No. 165 of 2012 is applicable in the present case, and therefore the cost of individual elements with reference to apportioned approved cost should be considered. There is time over-run in both...the assets and the reason cited by the petitioner is that the line passed through Sariska Tiger Sanctuary. Since the petitioner is well conversant with such problems in the construction of...


Court: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Date: Aug 26, 2014 Cited By: 0
5

...payment of lumpsum compensation. This aspect was examined by this Court in the case of The State of Rajasthan & 1 Another Versus Rajendra Singh; D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.469/2020. It was held as under:- "This issue has been considered elaborately by a Division Bench of this court in the case of The Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, District...arises for consideration is as to what compensation should be awarded in lieu of reinstatement. The Division Bench of this court in the case of The Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, District Alwar (supra...worked. In the facts of the aforesaid case, this court, having found that the termination had taken place almost 25 years before and that the appointment of the workman was not as per the rules...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Jul 31, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
6

...State is directed to file a specific affidavit along with the survey sheet indicating the extent of the Sariska Tiger Reserve and also in the said survey sheet/map indicate the core area and the buffer zone as well as the outer boundary of the National Park and Tiger Reserve as notified.In case the...declaration of eco-sensitive zone around the National Park (Sariska) the same shall be filed. The concerned affidavit shall also indicate the position with regard to declaration of the eco-sensitive...large number of mines are under operation in and around the Sariska Reserve. Their aerial distance from the notified boundary shall also be indicated. The said information to be filed within two weeks...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Feb 20, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
7

...not been sent to MoEF by the States. The Learned Counsel for the respondent tried to make a distinction that in this case the Government of Rajasthan had sent the proposal to MoEF and it is pending consideration by MoEF.It is the admitted position that the final notification of Eco-sensitive zone for Sariska Tiger...submission made by the Counsel, we are of the considered view that the facts and circumstances of the present case, we permit the Sangh to be an intervener in this case.Accordingly, M.A...Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) and District Environment Impact Assessment Authority (DEIAA) on 30-05-2016 to Mines within 10 kms of the boundary of Sariska Tiger Reserve. It has been...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Dec 20, 2018 Cited By: 4 Coram: 2
8

...Government should also ensure cessation of mining activity in this case also before adding the area to Sariska Tiger Reserve. 11. As against it Shri Pareek drew my attention to the...that no mining operation of whatever nature shall be carried on within the protected area w.e.f. 31-12-91 was issued in view of the facts and circumstances of the case where a Committee was appointed and necessary instructions were given by the Apex Court. It was a case where notification dated 1-1-1975 Under Section 29 (3) of the Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953, declaring Sariska as...competent authority and thereupon the State Government recommended her case for diversion of the forest area and sent it to the Central Government (Ministry of Environment and Forest) for seeking prior...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: May 29, 2002 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
9

... 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of a regular bail to the petitioner in a case arising out of FIR No.111/2015, registered at Police Station Thanagazi, Alwar, for offences under Sections 332..., 353 IPC. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is residing in the village falling within Sariska Forest. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner after gate had closed, intended to go to...Mr. Rajveer Gurjar, for the petitioner. Mr. R.R. Baisla, Public Prosecutor for State. Mr. Raj Kumar, for the complainant. Present application has been filed under Section...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Jul 1, 2015 Cited By: 0
10

...same had not been sent to MoEF by the States. The Learned Counsel for the respondent tried to make a distinction that in this case the Government of Rajasthan had sent the proposal to MoEF and it is pending consideration by MoEF. It is the admitted position that the final notification of Eco-sensitive zone for Sariska Tiger...1. Proceedings in this matter have been initiated based on media report dated 27.07.2020 under the heading “Forest guard mowed down by ‘mining mafia’ in Sariska”. The report...is to the effect that a forest home guard was mowed down by a tractor belonging to suspected mining mafia inside Sariska Tiger Reserve on Sunday after he attempted to stop them along with his...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Apr 6, 2021 Cited By: 0 Coram: 5
11

...by the States. The Learned Counsel for the respondent tried to make a distinction that in this case the Government of Rajasthan had sent the proposal to MoEF and it is pending consideration by MoEF. It is the admitted position that the final notification of Eco- sensitive zone for Sariska Tiger...action against illegal mining in pasture land, within 10 km periphery of Sariska Tiger Reserve (STR), at village Baldevgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan and against illegally putting of the overburden on...that the area in question was within Eco-sensitive Zone of the Sariska Tiger Reserve/ Sanctuary and the Eco-sensitive Zone of the Sariska Tiger Reserve/Sanctuary. Though, ESZ had not yet been notified...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Nov 15, 2021 Cited By: 1 Coram: 6
12

...Director, Tiger Project, Sariska (supra) and are in agreement with the same and therefore we accept the present appeal and enhance the amount of...compensation from Rs.50,000/- to Rs.3,00,000/-. The said amount be released to the appellant within a period of four weeks. In case, the amount is not disbursed within the time as granted by this court, the...Nanga Mali, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Bhodra, Post And Tehsil Karauli, District Karauli (The Then District Sawaimadhopur) ----Appellant Versus 1...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Oct 7, 2023 Cited By: 0
13

...may be ordered to be listed after hearing in that case.The learned counsel also placed before us for our perusal a letter dated 5 March 2014 issued by the Deputy Conservator of Forest, Tiger Reserve, Sariska wherein...identical issue has been fixed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of I.A in the case of T.N Godavarman which is to be taken up by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 11 March 2014. As such this matter...the distance with regard to Khasra No. 1196/1260 from various points including (1) critical tiger habitat/core area (2) Sariska Tiger Reserve (3) Proposed National Park...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Mar 6, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
14

...This Review Application has been filed in respect of the order dated 20 December, 2018. As per the order, the case of Applicant and all other similar mining leases have to be placed before the National Board for Wildlife since they all fall within 10 kms of the Sariska Tiger...Reserve and the Eco-sensitive Zone of the same has not been notified till date.Although the...Applicant had raised all the grounds including that they have been operating since long while arguing the main matter, they have reiterated the same in this Review Application which does not form any legal...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Jan 22, 2019 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
15

... 4. The District Collector, Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 5. The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar...District Collector, Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 5. The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar Rajasthan ----Respondent.... The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Sep 4, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
16

... 4. The District Collector, Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 5. The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar...District Collector, Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 5. The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar Rajasthan ----Respondent.... The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Sep 4, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
17

... 4. The District Collector, Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 5. The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar...District Collector, Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 5. The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar Rajasthan ----Respondent.... The Conservator Of Forest And Director, Tiger Project, Sariska, Head Quarter, Alwar, District Alwar Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Sep 4, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

... Anil Kumar Bamba, Member Case of the Complainant The case of the Complainant as revealed from the record is that Complainant booked/purchased a plot No.19, measuring 200 sq. yds. At Sariska Green..., BUNKAR VIHAR, NAND NAGRI, DELHI-93 RBT/Complaint Case No. 302/22 In the matter of: 1. 2. Sh. Narender...perused the file and the written arguments filed by the Complainant. The case of the Complainant is that he has purchased a plot from the Opposite Party and paid full and final sale consideration of...


Court: District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Date: Mar 26, 2024 Cited By: 0
19

...by the States. The Learned Counsel for the respondent tried to make a distinction that in this case the Government of Rajasthan had sent the proposal to MoEF and it is pending consideration by MoEF. It is the admitted position that the final notification of Eco- sensitive zone for Sariska Tiger...action against illegal mining in pasture land, within 10 km periphery of Sariska Tiger Reserve (STR), at village Baldevgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan and against illegally putting of the overburden on...that the area in question was within Eco-sensitive Zone of the Sariska Tiger Reserve/ Sanctuary and the Eco-sensitive Zone of the Sariska Tiger Reserve/Sanctuary. Though, ESZ had not yet been notified...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Nov 15, 2021 Cited By: 0 Coram: 6
20

...make a distinction that in this case the Government of Rajasthan had sent the proposal to MoEF and it is pending consideration by MoEF. It is the admitted position that the final notification of Eco-sensitive zone for Sariska Tiger.... Proceedings in this matter have been initiated based on media report1dated 27.07.2020 under the heading "Forest guard mowed down by 'mining mafia' in Sariska". The...report is to the effect that a forest guard was mowed down by a tractor belonging to suspected mining mafia inside Sariska Tiger Reserve on Sunday after he attempted to stop them along with his...


Court: National Green Tribunal
Date: Jan 28, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 4

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).