CiteTEXT
...AIR 1954 Mad 928 accepted the contention of the assessee while giving its advisory opinion on the questions of law referred to it by the Appellate...Madras in Viswanathan Chettiar case AIR 1954 Mad 928 came to the conclusion that the word “assessment” in proviso to Section 34(3) means...by the Madras High Court in Viswanathan Chettiar case AIR 1954 Mad 928 though a different view of the law may be reasonably possible...
.... v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. AIR 1954 Mad 520, (1953) 2 MLJ 714 in which a decision of the Bombay High Court in...Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation Co. Ltd. v. D.K. Patkar AIR 1935 Bom 236 was followed. To the same effec...Dhanamal Aswani AIR 1964 SC 1736 the rights of the third party to get indemnified can be exercised only against the insurer of the vehicle. It is thus clear that the third party is not concerned...
...& Co., Ltd. v. State of Madras 5 Mad STC 216=AIR (1954) Mad 1130...appellants to tax under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The tax so assessed under the diverse orders of assessment was paid from time to time. For the quarters ending June 30, 1949 to March 31, 1954 the appellant...the appellants applied on August 9, 1954 to the High Court of Judicature, Orissa for(a) a declaration that the provisions of the Orissa Sales Tax Act...
...(Bhogilal M. Davay v. S.R Subramania Iyer AIR 1954 Mad 514, (1953) 2 MLJ 625).”12. In its impugned judgment, the H...of the Supreme Court reported as Nedunuri Kameswaramma v. Sampati Subba Rao . AIR 1963 SC 884...
...Ren CR 563, G. Rangamannar Chetty v. Desu Rangiah AIR 1954 Mad 182, 1952 Mad LJ 652, Vishwa Nath v. Chaman.... Rangamannar v. Desu Rangiah AIR 1954 Mad 182, 1952 Mad LJ 652 the original tenant, a few years after the commencement of the tenancy, entered into a partnership with two persons and carried on...
...Kasam Dada v. Vijayanagaram Commercial Association AIR (1954) Mad 528.Reference might in this connection be made to Section 33 of the Arbitration Act which..., Illuru Hanumanthiah v. Umnabad Thimmaiah AIR 1954 Mad 87 and Hussain Kasam Dada v. Vijayanagaram Comm. Asson. .... Ramakrishna Rice & Oil Mills AIR 1956 Mad 110, and that in our opinion is correct.19. It remains to deal with one other question on which the parties have been at issue...
...: (AIR 1954 Mad 1057) (A) that an order made under S. 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure or any other provision of law for the stay of trial of a suit is not a...ILR (1954) Mad 1104 : (AIR 1954 Mad. 1058), (FB) (B), by the learned counsel. The learned Judge held that an order refusing t...ILR (1954) Mad 1104 : (AIR 1954 Mad 1053) (FB) (B), is liable to be questioned ...
..., Madras AIR 1954 Mad 369 the Division Bench of the said High Court has held that Section 18(b) by necessary implication gives power to the Tribunal to add parties. It can add necessary or proper...AIR 1954 Mad 686 a Single Judge of the Madras High Court followed the earlier decision, though in this case, a party that was summoned by the Tribunal had...Upadhaya v. P.K Sarkar AIR 1961 Cal 60 a learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court has accepted the same view. In that case, the Trustees of the Provident Fund in question who had not been...
...Madras General Sales-tax Act. In --Gannan Dunkerley & Co. v. state of Madras', AIR 1954 Mad 1130 (A...
...of Madras AIR 1954 Mad 621, (1954) 1 Mad LJ 117, considered the provisions of the Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act, 1933, one of...P.P Kutti Keya v. State of Madras AIR 1954 Mad 621, (1954) 1 Mad LJ 117 was af...referring to the principles laid down in the leading cases of Shirur Mutt 1954 SCR 1005, AIR 1954 SC 282, 1954 SCJ 335...
...Nagendramma v. Ramakotayya, AIR 1954 Mad 713, and the decision of the Hyderabad High Court in Varalakshmi v. Viramuhi, AIR 195.... The correctness of the Bench decision in AIR 1954 Mad 713 was canvassed in the Full Bench decision in Palaniswami Gounder v. Devanai Ammal, (S...321 and AIR 1954 Mad 713, were overruled. The learned Judges of the Hyderabad High Court in AIR 1956 Hyd 75, followed the decisions of the Madras High Court in AIR 1950...
...Dunkerley and Co. (Madras) Ltd. v. State of Madras AIR 1954 Mad 1130, (1955) 1 MLJ 87, ILR 1955 Mad 832 the...High Court of Madras in Gannon Dunkerley case AIR 1954 Mad 1130, (1955) 1 MLJ 87, ILR 1955 Mad 832. The Nagpur High Court...High Court of Madras in Gannon Dunkerley & Co. (Madras) Ltd. v. State of Madras AIR 1954 Mad 1130...
...University of Madras v. Shantha Bai AIR 1954 Mad 67. The High Court, considering the question whether a University can be held to be local or other authority as...B.W Devadas v. Selection Committee for Admission of Students to the Karnatak Engineering College, AIR 1964 Mysore 6 the High Court of Mysore similarly held: “The term ‘authority...AIR 1966 Pun 34 where the decision given in the case of University of Madras (1) was followed and the principle laid down therein was approved and applied. On the basis of these decisions, and the...
...the Madras High Court in Subbaiah Goundan v. Ramasami Goundan AIR 1954 Mad 604 (FB) to the effect that...Subbaiah Goundan v. Ramasami Goundan AIR 1954 Mad 604 (FB.... The question again arose before another Full Bench in Subbaiah Goundan v. Ramasami Goundan AIR 1954 Mad 604...
...Muthiah Muthirian v. Vairaperumal Muthirian, AIR 1954 Mad 214, as enjoining upon him to give possession of these articles to the complainant in the case. The r..., when such circumstances as these exist, the decision in AIR 1954 Mad 214, will not apply. The following observation therein at page 215 bears out my view.“In normal circumstances, on...Jackson, J. in V.K Vaiyapuri Chetty v. Sinniah Chetty, 59 Mad LJ 901 : (AIR 1931 Mad 17). At page 903 (of Mad...
...: (AIR 1954 Mad 91 (A)), considered the question, whether both the applicant and the authorised representative should have signed, or, it...-Tax Officer, 1954-25 ITR 400 : (AIR 1954 Mad 806 (B)), held that the...would meet the requirements of law if one of them had signed it. Dealing with that question, Satyanarayana Rao J., who delivered the judgment, observed at p. 92 (of ITR): (at p. 92 of AIR), thus...
..., 1954-5 STC 128 : (AIR 1954 Mad 954), State of Bombay v. Ahmadabad...: (AIR 1954 Mad 954), when motor transport companies carrying on the only business of providing transport sold away unserviceable or useless...of the firm's business.14. Gannon Dunkerly and Co. v. State of Madras, 1954-5 STC 216 : (AIR 1954 Mad 1130) was relied on to show that...
...SC 170 (A), and — ‘China Ramayya v. Venkanraju’, AIR 1954 Mad 864 (FB)(B).3. This contention is an entirely new one...following passage from — ‘Krishnaswami Konan v. Ramasami Ayyar’, 22 Mad 519 (C), quoted with approval in AIR 1954 Mad 864 at p. 867 (B), lends considerable support to this...Full Bench of the Madras High Court in — ‘Pannalal v. Mt. Naraini’, AIR 1952...
...: (AIR 1954 Mad 527). Neither of these cases is in point because they deal with the meaning of the word “receivable” in...of Income-tax Bombay City, (1954) 26 ITR 758 : ((S) AIR 1955 SC 58...: (AIR 19511 Mad 551). To attract the operation of S. 12-B it is therefore sufficient if the profits arose. They need not have been actually received.16. ...
...Association AIR 1954 Mad 528 (AIR at p. 531), rel. on; Ruby...Khardah Co. Ltd. v. Raymon & Co. (India) (P) Ltd. AIR 1962 SC 1810...: (AIR pp. 1810-11)“It cannot be disputed that the expression ‘arising out of’ or ‘concerning’ or ‘in connection with’ or ‘in consequence of’ or ‘relating to this...