...Nilratan Sircar v. . Lakshmi Narayan Ram Niwas (AIR 1965 SC 1 : 1965 MLJ (Criminal) 411 : (...JUDGMENT1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant J.S Muthu under Section 54 of the Foreign...Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (Act 46 of 1973). The only charge framed in this case is that the appellant has received a sum of Rs. 50,000/- in contravention of provisions of Section 9(1) (b) of...

...bombay 121 and the allahabad high court in abdul shakoor v. Smt. Kulsum bibi 1962 (1) criminal law journal 247, This court has held in kannoth meethalayissu v. Thevikandiyil ahammad - (1965 mlj. (crl...1. A mohammedan husband who has been ordered to pay maintenance to his wife and child under s. 488, Criminal procedure code is the revision petitioner. The petitioner married the...

...carried on by the assessee till 31-7-1965. The Tribunal, accordingly, upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to permit the deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.... (1967) 63 ITR 632, AIR 1967 SC 854, (1967) 1 MLJ (SC) 57, shows that no decisive inference can be drawn from the fact that...Order1. Leave granted.2. We are concerned with the following questions, which were answered, in the judgment and order of...

..., A. Mohammed Jaffar Saheb v. A. Palaniappa Chettiar (1964) 1 MLJ 112 and R. Chellammal v. Accommodation Contr...non-residential use, it was held to the contrary in Premchand Motichand v. Hameed Sultan (1958) 1 MLJ 32 (SN...judgment under appeal is assailed by the appellant on four grounds viz.(1) Since the ground floor constitutes a building by itself within the meaning of Section 2(2) of...

...respondents instituted OS No. 24 of 1953 against several persons including Kannammal challenging inter alia the validity of the bequest made by Ponnuswami. On February 1, 1952 Kannammal died leaving as her...v.K. Ramunni AIR 1965 SC 337, this Court held:“a registered instrument styled a release deed releasing the right, title and interest of the...K. Hutchi Gowder v. H. Bheema Gowder . (1959) 2 MLJ 324 “A release deed can only feed title but cannot transfer title” and another observation in S.P Chinnathambiar v. V....

..., (1965) 1 Cri LJ 226, this Court observed:“But it would, we think, be unreasonable to contend that evidence given by witnesses should be discarded only on the ground..., (1957) 2 MLJ (SC) 69 in which it was observed as under:“On a consideration of the relevant authorities and the provisions of the Evidence Act, the following...propositions may be safely stated as firmly established:(1) As a general rule, a court can and may act on the testimony of a single witness though...

...in Srirakulu (1965) 1 SCR 186, AIR 1965 SC 621, (1965) 2 MLJ 111 referred hereafter and conflicts with it. Further consideration of the same is, therefore, not necessary...Srirakulu (1965) 1 SCR 186, AIR 1965 SC 621, (1965) 2 MLJ 111 was rendered with reference to the Madras Cooperative Societies Act, 1932 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Madras Act..., (1965) 2 MLJ 111 quoted therein is as under:“51. ArbitrationDisputes: (1) If any dispute touching the...

...Order1. The short point involved in this appeal by special leave from a judgment and order of the Delhi High Court dated November 20, 1980...requirements of Rule 27(2) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (‘Rules’ for short) which have been made applicable to the personnel of the Border Roads Organisation...27, 1978 transferred the appellant to 19 Border Roads Task Force. On July 1, 1978 the Officer Commanding forwarded the order of termination issued by the Chief Engineer, but on representation by the...

..., AIR 1965 SC 845 : (1965) 1 SCR 933..., Varadarajan and Ranganath Misra, JJ.) of 1-5-1985 in Mohinder Singh case which merely directed payment of enhanced solatium and interest without giving any reasons or referring to the contrary opinion in...three Judges — Supreme Court Rules, 1966, Order 7 Rules 1 and 2 — Stare Decisis — Constitution of India, Articles 145, 137 and 141Held...

...upper floor of the building standing over the suit property) against the respondent. The suit was numbered as OS No. 1907 of 1965 and after trial decreed on 30-1-1968. The decree was put into...Reddi AIR 1948 PC 3, (1947) 2 MLJ 511 and Katragadda China Anjaneyulu v. Kattaragadda China Ramayya AIR 1965...AP 177, (1965) 1 An LT 149 (FB)]. The view taken by the Privy Council was cited with approval before this Court in State Of Punjab...

...Order1. Question of law referred to this Bench is: whether the criminal court is debarred from proceeding with the private complaint laid against...of a cheque dated 22-11-1963 and the civil suit had come to be dismissed on 30-1-1965. Thereafter, the private complaint was filed on 16-11-1965. In the light of those facts it was held that the...Sanmukhsingh v. King AIR 1950 PC 31, (1950) 1 MLJ 286, the Privy Council also had held th...

..., on the same being allowed, the same was converted to Special Civil Suit No. 5 of 1965.4. Respondents 1 and 4 filed a common written statement contending that the appellants...Rajasthan v. Vidhyawati AIR 1962 SC 933, 1962 Supp (2) SCR 989, (1963) 1 MLJ (SC) 70 the question arose with regard to the vicarious liability of the State of Rajasthan. In that case a..., (1963) 1 MLJ (SC) 70 by observing:“In dealing with such cases, it must be borne in mind that when the State pleads immunity against claims for damages...

...obligation under the decree.5. By a Master's summons, dated August 30, 1965, Hungerford made an application praying that Mundhra may be directed to implement the decree by...was dismissed on September 28, 1965, by Justice Ray, holding that the application was one for execution of the decree in Suit No. 600 of 1961 and must be in a tabular form and “that any imposition of...time-limit would be to engraft something on the decree which does not exist in the decree”. Hungerford preferred an appeal against the said order (Appeal No. 286 of 1965). The appeal was dismissed on...

...AIR 1965 SC 101, (1964) 5 SCR 239. Beg, J., followed the decision of this Court in Raval case (1969)...K. Sukumaran Nair v. S. Neelakantan Nair (1976) 2 MLJ 84 held that notice to quit under Section 106...case (1976) 2 MLJ 84 the learned Judge has pointed out the difference of opinion expressed in the various decisions of the Madras High...

...1965 SC 202, (1964) 8 SCR 133, (1965) 1 Cri LJ 226 wherein the defence did not opt to examine some witnesses who have been left out by the prosecution on the bona fide belief that those...(1966) 1 SCR 178, AIR 1965 SC 1887, (1965) 2 Cri LJ 817 while dealing with the ample p...S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.— These criminal appeals by special leave granted under Article 136 of the Constitution of India are preferred by the appellant questioning the...

...(1988) 3 SCC 609 and Triveniben (1989) 1 SCC 678 indicate that SCC has been copied by MLJ of the defendants while such copying is not found in other journals...523 and Dorling v. Honnor Marine Ltd. 1965 Ch 1, (1964) 2 WLR 195 (CA) are not applicable in the facts of this case.90...(2017) 1 SCC 9 (1...

...produce an unreasonable result”, said Danckwerts, L.J, in Artemiou v. Procopiou (1966) 1 QB 878, (1965) 3 All ER 539, (1965) 3 WLR 1011 (CA) (at All ER p. 544...Section 6 cannot be issued beyond the prescribed period of the notification under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Act. It has to be noted that there is another judgment of two learned Judges in...the order of the High Court and not from the date on which the original publication under Section 4(1) came to be made.5. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted...

...AIR 1947 Mad 352, (1947) 1 MLJ 277...agree for design or object of the conspiracy. Conspiracy is conceived as having three elements: (1) agreement (2) between two or more persons by whom the agreement is effected; and (3) a criminal object.... (1970) 1 SCC 696, (1971) 1 SCR 119 it was held that Section 120-B IPC makes the ...

...the purpose of Kerala Rent Act. The said notification reads as under:“Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965-Noti. under Section 18(1) conferring on District...whether Rent Controller and appellate authority under the Punjab Rent Restriction Act are courts or civil courts for purposes of Sections 195(1)(b), 476 and 479-A of Criminal Procedure Code. Tuli, J...and to file complaint under Section 195(1)(b) of Criminal Procedure Code if it is found expedient in the interest of justice.22. As a result of the aforesaid...