Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Madras High Court
38725
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
34386
Bombay High Court
27349
Punjab & Haryana High Court
22112
Allahabad High Court
21726
Karnataka High Court
20291
Delhi High Court
19070
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
17791
Kerala High Court
16898
Patna High Court
14122
Madhya Pradesh High Court
13813
Gujarat High Court
11757
Calcutta High Court
11513
Central Administrative Tribunal
11174
Rajasthan High Court
10657
CESTAT
9640
Andhra Pradesh High Court
9433
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
8166
Himachal Pradesh High Court
6618
Supreme Court Of India
6589
Central Information Commission
6562
Chhattisgarh High Court
6432
Telangana High Court
6086
Gauhati High Court
5009
Debts Recovery Tribunal
4982
Jharkhand High Court
3934
Orissa High Court
3865
National Green Tribunal
3500
SEBI
3421
National Company Law Tribunal
3357
Uttarakhand High Court
3277
Armed Forces Tribunal
3006
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
2818
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
2753
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
1555
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
1396
Manipur High Court
1258
RERA
1057
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
1032
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
926
Tripura High Court
721
Company Law Board
644
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
524
Meghalaya High Court
484
Securities Appellate Tribunal
342
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
303
Board of Revenue
286
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
285
Competition Commission Of India
261
Sikkim High Court
253
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
204
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
182
Privy Council
180
Railway Claims Tribunal
152
Competition Appellate Tribunal
151
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
114
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
75
Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
69
Commissioner (Appeals)
67
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
67
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
63
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
47
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
42
Authority For Advance Rulings
40
Settlement Commission
35
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
17
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
17
District Court
16
Trade Marks Registry
5
Collector Appeals
4
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
2
AAR-GST
1
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
1
Consumer Disputes Redressal
1
Copyright Board
1
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
1
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Deputy Collector
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Jaipur
0
Right to Information
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
186611
From 2011 To 2020
132853
From 2001 To 2010
29670
From 1991 To 2000
12119
From 1981 To 1990
6574
From 1971 To 1980
3962
From 1961 To 1970
2801
From 1951 To 1960
1849
Before 1950
1726

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...has supposedly not applied the mandatory provision of Army Rule 180 while carrying out such investigation and, therefore, he has been denied his statutory right to natural....”4. In the absence of such mandatory safeguards as stipulated in the Army Rules, it would be improper for the authorities to initiate disciplinary action against the petitioner. Neither...justice.2. The short and moot issue is the non-application of Army Rule 180 while conducting a Court of Inquiry in which the military reputation and character of an individual is...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Mar 9, 2010 Cited By: 58 Coram: 2
2

...involved, was not followed in both the cases. Courts of Inquiry were the foundations for investigation the allegations against the petitioner. Army Rule 180 is mandatory, if and when, Court of Inquiry is...on the false accusations and contradictions in their complaints. A judicial review of Courts of Inquiry and non-compliance of Army Rule 180 vis-a-vis violations of mandatory provisions of law in GCM...held as it is in the nature of preliminary investigations. The mandatory provision is to be followed when a person is liable to be charged with an indictable offence. Thus very process of taking...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: May 26, 2000 Cited By: 129 Coram: 1
3

.... 7. Army Rule 180 has a mandatory import. In the decision reported in Col. Prithi Pal Singh Bedi v. Union of India (AIR 1982 SC 1413), the apex Court held...of Inquiry is required, by mandatory Army Rule 180, to observe the principles of natural justice and, therefore, even during the course of investigation, a Court of Inquiry cannot flout the rules of...the presence of the accused during the Court of Inquiry. This rule has the mandatory import and cannot in any way be given a go by, merely because the offender was in judicial custody of...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Mar 9, 2011 Cited By: 2 Coram: 2
4

...others (1982(2) SLR 782), wherein Army Rule 180 was held to be having mandatory import. In view of the decision in Bansals case (supra), it is a statutory protection...particular witness is likely to affect his character or military reputation, and (4) such a person has a right to produce evidence in defence of his character or military reputation. It is the mandatory duty...aggrieved person to examine any of the witnesses in his defence. The right under Army Rule 180 was denied to him without any justified reasons. 2. However, from the side of the...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Jun 4, 2010 Cited By: 1 Coram: 2
5

...mandatory requirement and its non-observance will vitiate any subsequent disciplinary proceedings. In the case of officers, the rule becomes equally mandatory if the accused officer requires its observance...unless it is shown that the accused has been prejudiced or a mandatory provision has been violated. One may usefully refer to Rule 149 quoted above. The High Court should not allow the challenge to the...respondent was afforded full opportunity to be present throughout the proceedings in the court of inquiry in accordance with Army Rule 180 and for submitting anything in his defence. The Court of Inquiry...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Dec 8, 1997 Cited By: 209 Coram: 1
6

...punished with dismissed from service. 3. A Court of Inquiry was ordered by the Station Headquarters. The Court of Inquiry violated the mandatory provisions of Army...Summary Court Martial by his Commanding Officer, Col. A.K Pandey. This Summary Court Martial violated the basic mandatory provisions of the Army Act/Rules as well as the...irregularities, it was admitted that while a Court of Inquiry has been held in February 1997, Army Rule 180 has not been applied. However, the individual has given his statement as a...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Feb 1, 2010 Cited By: 1 Coram: 2
7

...., in which the Honble High Court of Delhi held that Rule 180 is mandatory in character due to the word must used in the Rule. Court of Inquiry proceedings vitiated on account of violation of Rule...Staff (Delhi) in which the Honble High Court (DB) maintained that compliance to the requirements of Rule 180 is mandatory. The language of the Rule is certain and unambiguous, capable of only one...convened to investigate the same in which the applicant was called as a witness. Army Rule 180 was not applied. On TA No.512 of 2009 Ex. Lt. Col. (TS) B.K. Mall Page 3 of 15 completion of the COI in...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Sep 22, 2011 Cited By: 2 Coram: 2
8

.... The rule is mandatory and statutory; duly invoked in the inquiry against him in December 2007. Use of words “must” and “shall” be seen. Onus on inquiry officer to give “full and clear notice” is...specific. “Full opportunity” and not “reasonable opportunity” specified; being pari materia to Section 8(b) of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. AFT acknowledged it as mandatory as in R.D. Sharma...this complaint, a “discreet inquiry” was ordered and because of this reason, promotion of the Officer was withheld, pending discipline and vigilance clearance which is mandatory for according such...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Oct 24, 2018 Cited By: 5 Coram: 2
9

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Oct 23, 2020 Cited By: 1
10

...Union of India & Ors Vs Sanjay Jethi (2013) 16 SCC 116 has taken a view that in the case of violation of a mandatory provision such as Army Rule 180, the question of prejudice would not...accused or violation of a mandatory provision, vitiate the court martial; (ii) procedural defects unless vital and substantial will not affect the trial (iii) the.... The decision in the case of Sanjay Jethi basically relates to Army Rule 180, whereas for the reasons recorded in the order dated 23.09.2011, this Tribunal has rejected the arguments advanced on behalf...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Mar 31, 2015 Cited By: 0
11

..., the documents were not given to the applicant warranting judicial review by this Tribunal. We find that the mandatory procedure under AR 180 was not followed by the respondents with regard to those...to it. CoI is in the nature of a fact-finding inquiry committee. The learned Judges proceeded to state that:“7. … Army Rule 180 provides, inter alia, that whenever any inquiry...be heard or that a summary of evidence be recorded or that a court martial be convened. Principles of natural justice are not attracted to such a preliminary inquiry. Army Rule 180, however, which is...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Oct 18, 2013 Cited By: 96 Coram: 2
12

...are mandatory and in fact they place an obligation upon the Presiding Officer to ensure compliance of said provisions in its true spirit and substance. In the event of non-compliance, the findings and...rights, under this rule. 16. To examine whether the requirements of Rule 180 are mandatory or directory and its effect on the case of the petitioner with reference to the facts and...mandatory cannot be treated to be directory at the discretion of the respondents. The petitioner had taken a definite stand during the course of proceedings and immediately thereafter that the non...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Jan 11, 2007 Cited By: 27 Coram: 1
13

...followed during Court of Inquiry then hearing of charge under Rule 22 could have been dispensed with. It is also pleaded that compliance of Army Rule 22 is mandatory as held....7. Learned counsel for the appellant has argued that because of the violation of the mandatory provisions of the Army Act and the Army Rules, which the applicant...the accused has been prejudiced or a mandatory provision has been violated. Thus, in view of the aforesaid pronouncement, in this case wherein the appellant himself has pleaded guilty cannot claim that...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Oct 26, 2018 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
14

...Rule 180 is mandatory. In view of above we are of the view that Army Rule 180 has not been complied with in letter and spirit.17. Now we come to third limb of argument that it is a...is mandatory.6. After the court of inquiry, summary of evidence was recorded and it is not disputed that the applicant has participated in the summary of evidence in accordance...witnesses, the applicant and other charged officers were called for compliance of Army Rule 180. Applicant appeared as witness No. 19 to cross examine the prosecution witnesses. Others were also given...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Dec 8, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
15

...Enquiry would not make the detention of the petitioner illegal. Further it has to be borne in mind that holding of a court of enquiry is not a mandatory pre-requisite for initiating disciplinary action...than the petitioner.3. The Court of Enquiry proceedings were held in violation of Army Rule 180 inasmuch as certain witnesses were not allowed to be cross examined by the petitioner...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Feb 21, 1994 Cited By: 1 Coram: 2
16

...complied with the mandatory requirements of supplying the pre-trial documents 96 hours in advance, which was a statutory right as enshrined in the army act and the rules made thereunder. This has...mandatory. Authorities are at full liberty to hear the case under Army Rule 22 and thereafter proceed with recording of the summary of evidence should it be so ordered. In this...wherein it was mandatory to constitute a Court of Inquiry before recording the summary of evidence. During the hearing of charge under AR 22 on 15.12.2006, witnesses were produced and the accused was...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Jul 22, 2010 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
17

...respondents by specifying that no Court of Inquiry had been held in this particular case since a Court of Inquiry is not mandatory. Therefore, there was no occasion to apply Army Rule 180 against the petitioner..., the fact of a fair and just trial is apparently disputed due to lack of TA NO. 217 OF 2010 signatures of the petitioner on his plea of guilt or on the mandatory caution under Army...Army Rule 180 was never applied in the initial investigation into his absence. He was not given a fair hearing under Army Rule 22 and even the recording of summary of...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: May 11, 2010 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
18

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Aug 22, 2023 Cited By: 0
19

..., which is mandatory in view of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case reported in Military Law Journal 2013 SC 1 Union of...officer. From Court of Inquiry reasonably it may be inferred to be suffering from two lapses; (1) Army Rule 180 has not been complied with; and (2) there seems to be no eye...respondents proceeded with pre-decided mind to spoil petitioner's career by holding him guilty, that too without following the provisions contained in Army Rule 180. The opinion of...


Court: Armed Forces Tribunal
Date: Jul 4, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
20

...fully understands his rights under the Rules. A question that is often asked in any action challenging the Court of Inquiry proceedings is whether Rule 180 supra is mandatory or directory in nature...question as to whether a statute is mandatory or directory depends upon the intent of the Legislature and not upon the language in which the intent is clothed. The meaning and intention of the Legislature...Lordships were examining the question whether Article 320 of the Constitution of India was mandatory or directory in...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Aug 24, 2007 Cited By: 12 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).