AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HARRY ADLER, Respondent v. TULLY DI NAPOLI, INC., Appellant, and NICHOLAS ASCENZO et al., Partners Doing Business under the Name of ASCENZO SONS, Respondents.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when an arm or boom of a hoist mounted upon a truck, being used by a subcontractor to hoist granite blocks from a freight train, broke by reason of a patent defect in the hoisting apparatus. Order denying motion to set aside a verdict against appellant, the general contractor in charge of the work in which the truck was used, and dismissing the cross complaint of appellant against defendants-respondents, the subcontractors using the truck in that work, and the judgment therein entered in favor of the plaintiff-respondent and against appellant, and dismissing the said cross complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent and to the defendants-respondents. ( Adler v. Long Island R.R. Co., 297 N.Y. 542; Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Constr. Corp., 290 N.Y. 145, 156-157.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ADLER v. TULLY DI NAPOLI, INC
(Dec 13, 1948)