AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VICKIE L. COLLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant did not object to the sentence imposed, nor did she move to withdraw her plea of guilty or vacate the judgment of conviction. Defendant therefore failed to preserve for our review her contention that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence ( see, People v. Perry, 252 A.D.2d 990, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 929). In any event, that contention lacks merit. Contrary to defendant's contention, the court did not impose an enhanced sentence. The court informed defendant before she entered her plea that a fine would be imposed as part of the sentence and that the maximum fine would be $5,000. The further contention of defendant concerning the severity of the sentence does not survive her waiver of the right to appeal ( see, People v. Lococo, 92 N.Y.2d 825, 827).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COLLEY
(Dec 21, 2001)