AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF FERRARA EQUIPMENT, INC., appellant, v. RAYMOND P. MARTINEZ, ETC., respondent.

DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body after a hearing is limited to whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence upon the entire record (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176; Matter of Liuzzo v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals Bd., 209 A.D.2d 618). "A reviewing court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the Hearing Officer where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists" (Matter of McQueeney v. Dutchess County Sheriff, 223 A.D.2d 710, 711).

The determination that the petitioner violated New York City Traffic Rules and Regulations (34 RCNY) § 4-15(b)(9) and (10) is supported by substantial evidence, and we find no basis for disturbing it.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE FERRARA EQUIPMENT, INC. v. MARTINEZ
(May 5, 2003)