DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from so much of the order of disposition as committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for one year must be dismissed as academic because the placement period has expired (see Matter of Neftaly R., 283 A.D.2d 579, 580).
The appellant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that his allocution was defective since he did not move to withdraw his admission on the grounds now asserted (see Family Ct Act § 321.4; CPL 220.60; People v. Crowell, 273 A.D.2d 321; People v. McCoy, 270 A.D.2d 432; cf. Matter of Anthony S., 302 A.D.2d 531 [2d Dept, Feb. 18, 2003]). We decline to review the appellant's contention in the interest of justice.
FEUERSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.