Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-qualified-immunity-in-prisoners& Case Commentaries

Under FAPA, a foreclosure judgment is not “enforced” until the auction concludes: Second Department applies retroactivity and time-bars suit despite judgment of foreclosure and sale

Under FAPA, a foreclosure judgment is not “enforced” until the auction concludes: Second Department applies retroactivity and time-bars suit despite judgment of foreclosure and sale

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Under FAPA, a foreclosure judgment is not “enforced” until the auction concludes: Second Department applies retroactivity and time-bars suit despite judgment of foreclosure and sale Introduction...
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (Haw. 2025) 1. Introduction Case: State of Hawaiʻi v. Erik Willis,...
Distinguishing Weapons Offenses from “Marijuana Offenses” Under Missouri Amendment 3 – A Commentary on C.S. v. Missouri State Highway Patrol CJIS (Mo. banc 2025)

Distinguishing Weapons Offenses from “Marijuana Offenses” Under Missouri Amendment 3 – A Commentary on C.S. v. Missouri State Highway Patrol CJIS (Mo. banc 2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Distinguishing Weapons Offenses from “Marijuana Offenses” Under Missouri Amendment 3 A Comprehensive Commentary on C.S. v. Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Justice Information Service, 645...
Mack v. Missouri – Curtailing the Abandonment Doctrine and Foreclosing Re-litigation of Direct-Appeal Issues in Rule 29.15 Proceedings

Mack v. Missouri – Curtailing the Abandonment Doctrine and Foreclosing Re-litigation of Direct-Appeal Issues in Rule 29.15 Proceedings

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Mack v. Missouri – Curtailing the Abandonment Doctrine and Foreclosing Re-litigation of Direct-Appeal Issues in Rule 29.15 Proceedings 1. Introduction In Cedric Dewayne Mack v. State of Missouri, the...
“The Sentencing-Date Rule” & the Limits of the Abandonment Doctrine: Commentary on Christopher A. Scott v. State of Missouri (Mo. banc 2025)

“The Sentencing-Date Rule” & the Limits of the Abandonment Doctrine: Commentary on Christopher A. Scott v. State of Missouri (Mo. banc 2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“The Sentencing-Date Rule” & the Limits of the Abandonment Doctrine Commentary on Christopher A. Scott v. State of Missouri Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc, July 22, 2025 1. Introduction In...
McCarty v. OCDC: Whistle-Blowing Does Not Trump Attorney-Client Confidentiality for Former Government Lawyers

McCarty v. OCDC: Whistle-Blowing Does Not Trump Attorney-Client Confidentiality for Former Government Lawyers

Date: Jul 23, 2025
McCarty v. OCDC: Whistle-Blowing Does Not Trump Attorney-Client Confidentiality for Former Government Lawyers 1. Introduction In In re: Ryan Christopher McCarty, the Supreme Court of Missouri,...
“Record-Based Abandonment”:  The Missouri Supreme Court Dispenses with Remand when Counsel’s Untimeliness is Apparent on the Face of the Record

“Record-Based Abandonment”: The Missouri Supreme Court Dispenses with Remand when Counsel’s Untimeliness is Apparent on the Face of the Record

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Record-Based Abandonment”: The Missouri Supreme Court Dispenses with Remand when Counsel’s Untimeliness is Apparent on the Face of the Record Introduction Nelson v. State of Missouri and Woods v....
“One-Tax, One-Jurisdiction”: The Missouri Supreme Court Limits Counties’ Marijuana Sales-Tax Authority to Unincorporated Areas

“One-Tax, One-Jurisdiction”: The Missouri Supreme Court Limits Counties’ Marijuana Sales-Tax Authority to Unincorporated Areas

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“One-Tax, One-Jurisdiction”: The Missouri Supreme Court Limits Counties’ Marijuana Sales-Tax Authority to Unincorporated Areas 1. Introduction In Robust Missouri Dispensary 3, LLC v. St. Louis...
From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes

From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes

Date: Jul 23, 2025
From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes Introduction In Jacqueline Davis v. BetMGM LLC, the Michigan Supreme...
Zakrzewski v. State – Fortifying Timeliness and Procedural-Bar Limits in Florida Capital Post-Conviction Practice

Zakrzewski v. State – Fortifying Timeliness and Procedural-Bar Limits in Florida Capital Post-Conviction Practice

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Zakrzewski v. State – Fortifying Timeliness and Procedural-Bar Limits in Florida Capital Post-Conviction Practice Introduction The Florida Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in Edward J. Zakrzewski, II v....
“A Six-Month Benchmark for Accounting Violations & Fitness-to-Practice Condition” – Commentary on In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr.

“A Six-Month Benchmark for Accounting Violations & Fitness-to-Practice Condition” – Commentary on In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr.

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“A Six-Month Benchmark for Accounting Violations & Fitness-to-Practice Condition” Commentary on In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr. 1. Introduction In In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr....
In re Chin: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Aligns Disciplinary Sanctions for Knowing Misappropriation and Client-Injury

In re Chin: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Aligns Disciplinary Sanctions for Knowing Misappropriation and Client-Injury

Date: Jul 23, 2025
In re Chin: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Aligns Disciplinary Sanctions for Knowing Misappropriation and Client-Injury Introduction In In the Matter of Justin Allen Chin (S25Y0879, decided 22 July 2025)...
“Central-Reason” Nexus Re-affirmed in Gang-Recruitment Cases: A Commentary on Deleg-Lopez v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

“Central-Reason” Nexus Re-affirmed in Gang-Recruitment Cases: A Commentary on Deleg-Lopez v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Central-Reason” Nexus Re-affirmed in Gang-Recruitment Cases: Deleg-Lopez v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Deleg-Lopez v. Bondi presented the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with...
“Ensuring” Is Not “Compelling”:  Second Circuit Clarifies Standing and APA §706(1) Constraints under the No Surprises Act

“Ensuring” Is Not “Compelling”: Second Circuit Clarifies Standing and APA §706(1) Constraints under the No Surprises Act

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Ensuring” Is Not “Compelling”: Second Circuit Clarifies Standing and APA §706(1) Constraints under the No Surprises Act Commentary on Neurological Surgery Practice of Long Island, PLLC v. U.S. Dep’t...
James v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Reach of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(6) and Re-emphasises Rigorous Causation Pleading in RLA Fraud and Duty-of-Fair-Representation Claims

James v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Reach of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(6) and Re-emphasises Rigorous Causation Pleading in RLA Fraud and Duty-of-Fair-Representation Claims

Date: Jul 23, 2025
James v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Reach of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(6) and Re-emphasises Rigorous Causation Pleading in RLA Fraud and...
Demasi and the Expansive Reach of Appeal Waivers: Sixth Circuit Bars Pre-Plea Constitutional Challenges on Direct Appeal

Demasi and the Expansive Reach of Appeal Waivers: Sixth Circuit Bars Pre-Plea Constitutional Challenges on Direct Appeal

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Demasi and the Expansive Reach of Appeal Waivers: Sixth Circuit Bars Pre-Plea Constitutional Challenges on Direct Appeal Introduction In United States v. Anthony Demasi, No. 24-1806 (6th Cir. 2025),...
United States v. Wright: Limiting Constitutional Review on Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas to the Statute of Conviction

United States v. Wright: Limiting Constitutional Review on Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas to the Statute of Conviction

Date: Jul 23, 2025
United States v. Wright: Limiting Constitutional Review on Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas to the Statute of Conviction 1. Introduction United States v. Billy Allen Wright, decided by the United...
United States v. Viramontes-Hernandez: Clarifying “Relevant Conduct” for the §2G2.2(b)(5) Pattern-of-Activity Enhancement

United States v. Viramontes-Hernandez: Clarifying “Relevant Conduct” for the §2G2.2(b)(5) Pattern-of-Activity Enhancement

Date: Jul 23, 2025
United States v. Viramontes-Hernandez: Clarifying “Relevant Conduct” for the §2G2.2(b)(5) Pattern-of-Activity Enhancement Introduction United States v. Emanuel Jose Viramontes-Hernandez, No. 24-1773...
Sixth Circuit Affirms District Courts’ Discretion to Treat Unscored Misdemeanor Conduct and Related Firearms as Aggravating Factors Under § 3553(a) – A Commentary on United States v. Bunn

Sixth Circuit Affirms District Courts’ Discretion to Treat Unscored Misdemeanor Conduct and Related Firearms as Aggravating Factors Under § 3553(a) – A Commentary on United States v. Bunn

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Sixth Circuit Affirms District Courts’ Discretion to Treat Unscored Misdemeanor Conduct and Related Firearms as Aggravating Factors Under § 3553(a) Comprehensive Commentary on United States v....
Bellinsky v. Galan: The Tenth Circuit Re-Sets the Boundaries of Younger Abstention in Domestic-Relations-Related §1983 Actions

Bellinsky v. Galan: The Tenth Circuit Re-Sets the Boundaries of Younger Abstention in Domestic-Relations-Related §1983 Actions

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Bellinsky v. Galan: The Tenth Circuit Re-Sets the Boundaries of Younger Abstention in Domestic-Relations-Related §1983 Actions Introduction Bellinsky v. Galan concerns two federal civil-rights suits...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.